), but in general, if a company’s performance falls short of investor expectations, its stock price may drop. Stocks are often riskier than bonds due to the multiple reasons a company’s business can fail.
Is it true that stocks are riskier than bonds?
Stocks are typically thought to be riskier than bonds. This article presents the statistics in a graphical format so that you can see for yourself whether stocks are indeed riskier than bonds.
Stocks are undoubtedly riskier than bonds for short-term investors. However, data from actual historical returns reveals that bonds were actually riskier than stocks for long-term investors. But it all hinges on having a clear understanding of what risk is.
Almost the entire investment community is focused on the erroneous notion of risk when it comes to long-term investors. For a long-term investor, much of what is written about risk is at best irrelevant and at worst simply incorrect. This is the result of a focus on short-term volatility.
We need a precise definition of risk for long-term investors. Risk is defined by financial academics and the investment community as the short-term (annual, monthly, or daily) volatility of an investment’s returns. The variance or standard deviation of returns is a measure of their volatility.
This notion of risk is problematic from the standpoint of a long-term investor for two reasons:
- The volatility of annual (or even monthly or daily) returns is nearly often the emphasis of the investigation and conclusions. For many investors, a yearly focus is appropriate, but long-term investors should be more concerned with the risks connected with their long-term wealth level, rather than the bumps along the way.
- Almost all analyses and conclusions are predicated on nominal returns, ignoring inflation’s degradation of buying power. Inflation may not be a major concern for short-term investors, but it has a significant long-term impact.
In regards to the second point, it seems self-evident that real (inflation adjusted) returns will lead to more accurate conclusions than nominal returns.
As for the first point, stocks are significantly riskier than long-term bonds or Treasury bills under the short-term volatility definition of risk (T-Bills). Stocks have outperformed both 20-year government bonds and T-Bills across all but one historical calendar 30-year period, according to US statistics dating back to 1926. Except for one of the 67 different 30 calendar year combinations, “Stocks have delivered a greater return from 1926 to 1955, then 1927 to 1956, all the way up to the most recent period of 1992 to 2021. Stocks, on the other hand, are deemed riskier due to increased annual volatility! (Admittedly, there would be more 30-year periods where long term bonds outperformed stocks based on non-calendar year start and finish points.)
You may be recommended to place a significant amount of your investments into Bonds or T-Bills to prevent risk (defined as annual or daily volatility), even if historical data suggests that they are nearly certain to underperform equities in the long run. While this way of thinking about risk may help you sleep easier at night, it could be quite dangerous to your long-term prosperity. (That is, if your goal is to maximize wealth at a remote time in the future, such as 20 or 30 years from now, as many investors, particularly younger investors, do.)
From 1926 to the present, the following graph depicts the real annual volatility in stock, bond, and T-Bill returns. This discussion of stocks is limited to the performance of the S&P 500 major firm stocks as a whole; it does not address the hazards of investing in a non-diversified stock portfolio. The bonds are 20-year US government bonds, and the investment is rolled over each year into a new 20-year bond to maintain the 20-year maturity. The data shown here is for U.S. returns from the Ibbotson yearbook Stocks, Bonds, Bills, and Inflation. The data for 2021 is current as of November 4th and derived from different sources. The totals represent the results “Dividends and capital gains or losses are included in “real” returns, which are adjusted for inflation each year. (Real returns are adjusted upwards by deflation during the depression years.) “The “inflation” figure was negative.)
Because the data for 2021 is as of November 4, 2021, it is referred to as 2021e or 2021 approximated. By the end of 2021, the real outcomes will most likely be only slightly different.
On an annual basis, the stock returns (blue bars) were unquestionably more volatile. Returns on long-term Treasury bonds (red bars) were likewise extremely volatile, although T-Bill returns (green bars) were more consistent. It’s also clear that the average stock return is far higher than the average bond return, which is significantly higher than the average T-Bill return.
Stocks have recorded calendar year losses of above 30% on a real return basis in four of the 96 years from 1926 to 2021, the most recent being in 2008. And two of those occurrences (1930-1931 and 1973-1974) featured an adjacent calendar year with a loss of at least 20%, resulting in a total compounded loss of more than 60%! Using daily data, there would be more instances of equities falling by at least 60% from their prior high. That is a very real danger, and it is exceedingly difficult to bear. Despite this, we know that equities have consistently outperformed bonds over time.
The age-old debate for investors is whether the (very likely, but not guaranteed) higher long-term average return from equities deserves the additional risk (short-term volatility).
You must consider more than annual volatility when assessing the risk of stocks vs bonds. This is demonstrated in the following.
Imagine your wealthy uncle inviting you to a coin toss game. In the event that you lose, he will receive half of your net worth. If you win, he will pay you twice your current net worth.
So you’ll win 75% of your net worth on average, but you’ll also have a 50% chance of losing half your net worth and a 50% chance of tripling your net worth.
Is it worth your time to play this game? Yes, according to simple expected value math, but most people would consider it too hazardous to play. Losing half your net worth on a coin toss would be a tremendous bummer. (If a man is unsure, he should consult his wife; she will most likely have no reservations.)
How dangerous is this game? It’s really dangerous unless you’re permitted to play multiple times. Consider what would happen if your beginning net worth was $100,000 and your wealthy uncle told you that you could divide your money into ten piles and play the game ten times, with each attempt costing $10,000. If you win five times and lose five times, you will win $100,000 and lose $25,000, leaving you with a profit of $75,000. If you only win two times and lose eight, you’ll make a profit of $40,000 and a loss of $40,000 to break even. So now you can only lose if you win less than two out of ten coin tosses. This has a significant impact. It suddenly looks much more logical to play the game because there is so little risk of losing. Your predicted return remains at 75%, but your risk is significantly decreased (though not eliminated).
This demonstrates the importance of asking how many times you get to play the game when considering any risky undertaking. If the average return is positive, the risk decreases as the number of times you are permitted to play increases, and the risk approaches zero if you are allowed to play many times. The standard deviation of your overall return over “N” tries is calculated by multiplying the standard deviation of each individual try by the square root of “N.” As an example, “As “N” grows larger, your overall risk decreases dramatically.
Similarly, the longer you stay in the stock market, the less dangerous it becomes, if risk is defined as the chance of failing to beat bond or cash returns throughout your whole holding tenure.
When it comes to the stock market and the spectrum of possible returns, you can’t assess your risk without first considering how long you’ll be investing. It is widely assumed that the average investor is primarily concerned with annual and even daily returns, and has a one-year time horizon. The majority of stock market risk debate you’ll ever encounter will be on one-year or even daily volatility. That may be acceptable for the fictional average investor, but for actual long-term investors, it leads to entirely incorrect conclusions.
I would say that the danger of insufficient long-term real purchasing power growth is definitely the more significant risk for a long-term investment. When it comes to the long-term investor, analysis that focuses on the risk of short-term volatility in wealth or returns is simply looking at the incorrect risk.
You are under no obligation to agree with my opinions. You can also look at the graphs and come to your own conclusions.
Before acting, self-described long-term investors must ensure that they truly have a long time horizon. Many investors may find themselves in the position of having to pay out their investments early. This could be due to a variety of factors such as illness, job loss, disability, legal issues, and so on. However, if an investor is almost certain that they will have a very long time horizon, equities (based on a large stock index in the United States) look to be no riskier than bonds in terms of obtaining the highest end portfolio value.
The risk versus return trade-off, according to most investing theory, is a question of human preference. The stock market provides higher predicted average returns on equities, but at the cost of greater annual volatility. To their credit, the industry encourages investors with longer time horizons to have a bigger equity weighting, but it nevertheless recommends that all investors put some funds to bonds and bills. However, this provides investors with very little guidance.
In the end, I believe the risk-reward trade-off is more a function of time horizon and education than of personal taste. If you are almost positive that you will not need the money for another 20 years or more, stocks are not a riskier investment. Stocks will almost probably outperform bonds and bills in terms of returns (based on historic data).
If investors are informed about this, they can become more comfortable with stock volatility on a daily, monthly, and annual basis, knowing that they will virtually certainly achieve significant long-term returns. It’s like driving down a winding mountain road with a lot of switchbacks. Switchbacks and backtracking can be extremely stressful if you are unfamiliar with the road (as you think you are going in the wrong direction). However, if you have carefully studied a map, you may relax and the switchbacks will not upset you because you know the road to your destination will be winding.
Additionally, persons in the saving stage of their lives are not dependant on any one thirty-year period, but rather spend a set amount each year. Through time diversification, this lowers risk. If stocks are extremely likely to outperform bonds over a 30-year holding period, stocks may be nearly guaranteed to outperform bonds over a long sequence of 30-year holding periods.
Why are bonds considered to be safer than stocks?
Bond issuers guarantee a fixed rate of interest to investors. Before purchasing a bond, investors must first determine the interest rate that the issuer will pay. Changes in market interest rates have a direct impact on the value of a bond. The value of a bond drops as interest rates rise. Although the face value of a bond decreases with time, the interest rate paid to investors remains constant. Bonds are safer than equities because of their fixed interest rate payments. Stockholders, on the other hand, are not guaranteed a return on their investment. A bond with a $1,000 face value and a 6.0 percent yield, for example, pays $60 in annual interest. This sum is paid regardless of how the bond’s value changes.
Why are bonds preferable to stocks?
Volatility & Risk Stocks have the potential to provide bigger returns than bonds. Examine whether you are the type of investor who is willing to take on greater risks than bondholders. Stock investment is for you if you want the benefits of being a partial owner of a firm and the endless potential of raising stock value.
Are bonds safe in the event of a market crash?
Down markets provide an opportunity for investors to investigate an area that newcomers may overlook: bond investing.
Government bonds are often regarded as the safest investment, despite the fact that they are unappealing and typically give low returns when compared to equities and even other bonds. Nonetheless, given their track record of perfect repayment, holding certain government bonds can help you sleep better at night during times of uncertainty.
Government bonds must typically be purchased through a broker, which can be costly and confusing for many private investors. Many retirement and investment accounts, on the other hand, offer bond funds that include a variety of government bond denominations.
However, don’t assume that all bond funds are invested in secure government bonds. Corporate bonds, which are riskier, are also included in some.
What makes stocks and bonds so different?
- A stock market is a location where investors can trade equity securities (such as shares) offered by businesses.
- Investors go to the bond market to buy and sell debt instruments issued by companies and governments.
- Stocks are traded on a variety of exchanges, whereas bonds are typically sold over the counter rather than in a central area.
- Nasdaq and the New York Stock Exchange are two of the most well-known stock exchanges in the United States (NYSE).
Is it better to put your money in bonds or stocks?
Stocks have a bigger return potential than bonds, but they also have a higher risk profile. Bonds, on the other hand, provide more consistent returns and are better suited to risk-averse investors.
Is bond investing a wise idea in 2021?
Because the Federal Reserve reduced interest rates in reaction to the 2020 economic crisis and the following recession, bond interest rates were extremely low in 2021. If investors expect interest rates will climb in the next several years, they may choose to invest in bonds with short maturities.
A two-year Treasury bill, for example, pays a set interest rate and returns the principle invested in two years. If interest rates rise in 2023, the investor could reinvest the principle in a higher-rate bond at that time. If the same investor bought a 10-year Treasury note in 2021 and interest rates rose in the following years, the investor would miss out on the higher interest rates since they would be trapped with the lower-rate Treasury note. Investors can always sell a Treasury bond before it matures; however, there may be a gain or loss, meaning you may not receive your entire initial investment back.
Also, think about your risk tolerance. Investors frequently purchase Treasury bonds, notes, and shorter-term Treasury bills for their safety. If you believe that the broader markets are too hazardous and that your goal is to safeguard your wealth, despite the current low interest rates, you can choose a Treasury security. Treasury yields have been declining for several months, as shown in the graph below.
Bond investments, despite their low returns, can provide stability in the face of a turbulent equity portfolio. Whether or not you should buy a Treasury security is primarily determined by your risk appetite, time horizon, and financial objectives. When deciding whether to buy a bond or other investments, please seek the advice of a financial counselor or financial planner.
Are bonds currently safer than stocks?
“The I bond is a fantastic choice for inflation protection because you receive a fixed rate plus an inflation rate added to it every six months,” explains McKayla Braden, a former senior counselor for the Department of the Treasury, referring to a twice-yearly inflation premium.
Why invest: The Series I bond’s payment is adjusted semi-annually based on the rate of inflation. The bond is paying a high yield due to the strong inflation expected in 2021. If inflation rises, this will also adjust higher. As a result, the bond protects your investment from the effects of rising prices.
Savings bonds are regarded one of the safest investments because they are backed by the United States government. However, keep in mind that if and when inflation falls, the bond’s interest payout would decrease.
A penalty equal to the final three months’ interest is charged if a US savings bond is redeemed before five years.
Short-term certificates of deposit
Unless you take the money out early, bank CDs are always loss-proof in an FDIC-backed account. You should search around online and compare what banks have to offer to discover the best rates. With interest rates expected to climb in 2022, owning short-term CDs and then reinvesting when rates rise may make sense. You’ll want to stay away from below-market CDs for as long as possible.
A no-penalty CD is an alternative to a short-term CD that allows you to avoid the normal penalty for early withdrawal. As a result, you can withdraw your funds and subsequently transfer them to a higher-paying CD without incurring any fees.
Why should you invest? If you keep the CD until the end of the term, the bank agrees to pay you a fixed rate of interest for the duration of the term.
Some savings accounts provide higher interest rates than CDs, but these so-called high-yield accounts may need a substantial deposit.
Risk: If you take money out of a CD too soon, you’ll lose some of the interest you’ve earned. Some banks will also charge you a fee if you lose a portion of your principle, so study the restrictions and compare rates before you buy a CD. Furthermore, if you lock in a longer-term CD and interest rates rise, you’ll receive a smaller yield. You’ll need to cancel the CD to get a market rate, and you’ll likely have to pay a penalty.
Money market funds
Money market funds are pools of CDs, short-term bonds, and other low-risk investments that are sold by brokerage firms and mutual fund companies to diversify risk.
Why invest: Unlike a CD, a money market fund is liquid, which means you can usually withdraw your funds without penalty at any time.
Risk: Money market funds, according to Ben Wacek, founder and financial adviser of Guide Financial Planning in Minneapolis, are usually pretty safe.
“The bank informs you what rate you’ll earn, and the idea is to keep the value per share over $1,” he explains.
Treasury bills, notes, bonds and TIPS
Treasury bills, Treasury notes, Treasury bonds, and Treasury inflation-protected securities, or TIPS, are all issued by the US Treasury.
- TIPS are investments whose principal value fluctuates with the direction of inflation.
Why invest: All of these securities are very liquid and can be purchased and sold directly or through mutual funds.
Risk: Unless you buy a negative-yielding bond, you will not lose money if you hold Treasurys until they mature. If you sell them before they mature, you risk losing some of your principle because the value fluctuates with interest rates. Interest rates rise, which lowers the value of existing bonds, and vice versa.
Corporate bonds
Corporations can also issue bonds, which range from low-risk (issued by large profitable enterprises) to high-risk (issued by smaller, less successful companies). High-yield bonds, also known as “junk bonds,” are the lowest of the low.
“There are low-rate, low-quality high-yield corporate bonds,” explains Cheryl Krueger of Growing Fortunes Financial Partners in Schaumburg, Illinois. “I think those are riskier because you’re dealing with not only interest rate risk, but also default risk.”
- Interest-rate risk: As interest rates change, the market value of a bond might fluctuate. Bond values rise when interest rates decrease and fall when interest rates rise.
- Default risk: The corporation could fail to fulfill the interest and principal payments it promised, ultimately leaving you with nothing on your investment.
Why invest: Investors can choose bonds that mature in the next several years to reduce interest rate risk. Longer-term bonds are more susceptible to interest rate movements. Investing in high-quality bonds from reputed multinational corporations or buying funds that invest in a broad portfolio of these bonds can help reduce default risk.
Bonds are often regarded to be less risky than stocks, but neither asset class is without risk.
“Bondholders are higher on the pecking order than stockholders,” Wacek explains, “so if the company goes bankrupt, bondholders get their money back before stockholders.”
Dividend-paying stocks
Stocks aren’t as safe as cash, savings accounts, or government bonds, but they’re safer than high-risk investments like options and futures. Dividend companies are thought to be safer than high-growth equities since they provide cash dividends, reducing but not eliminating volatility. As a result, dividend stocks will fluctuate with the market, but when the market is down, they may not fall as much.
Why invest: Dividend-paying stocks are thought to be less risky than those that don’t.
“I wouldn’t call a dividend-paying stock a low-risk investment,” Wacek says, “since there were dividend-paying stocks that lost 20% or 30% in 2008.” “However, it has a smaller risk than a growth stock.”
This is because dividend-paying companies are more stable and mature, and they provide both a payout and the potential for stock price increase.
“You’re not just relying on the stock’s value, which might change, but you’re also getting paid a regular income from that stock,” Wacek explains.
Danger: One risk for dividend stocks is that if the firm runs into financial difficulties and declares a loss, it will be forced to reduce or abolish its dividend, lowering the stock price.
Preferred stocks
Preferred equities have a lower credit rating than regular stocks. Even so, if the market collapses or interest rates rise, their prices may change dramatically.
Why invest: Preferred stock pays a regular cash dividend, similar to a bond. Companies that issue preferred stock, on the other hand, may be entitled to suspend the dividend in particular circumstances, albeit they must normally make up any missing payments. In addition, before dividends may be paid to common stockholders, the corporation must pay preferred stock distributions.
Preferred stock is a riskier variant of a bond than a stock, but it is normally safer. Preferred stock holders are paid out after bondholders but before stockholders, earning them the moniker “hybrid securities.” Preferred stocks, like other equities, are traded on a stock exchange and must be thoroughly researched before being purchased.
Money market accounts
A money market account resembles a savings account in appearance and features many of the same features, such as a debit card and interest payments. A money market account, on the other hand, may have a greater minimum deposit than a savings account.
Why invest: Money market account rates may be greater than savings account rates. You’ll also have the freedom to spend the money if you need it, though the money market account, like a savings account, may have a monthly withdrawal limit. You’ll want to look for the greatest prices here to make sure you’re getting the most out of your money.
Risk: Money market accounts are insured by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC), which provides guarantees of up to $250,000 per depositor per bank. As a result, money market accounts do not put your money at risk. The penalty of having too much money in your account and not generating enough interest to keep up with inflation is perhaps the most significant danger, since you may lose purchasing power over time.
Fixed annuities
An annuity is a contract, usually negotiated with an insurance company, that promises to pay a set amount of money over a set period of time in exchange for a lump sum payment. The annuity can be structured in a variety of ways, such as paying over a certain amount of time, such as 20 years, or until the client’s death.
A fixed annuity is a contract that promises to pay a set amount of money over a set period of time, usually monthly. You can contribute a lump sum and start receiving payments right away, or you can pay into it over time and have the annuity start paying out at a later date (such as your retirement date.)
Why should you invest? A fixed annuity can provide you with a guaranteed income and return, which can help you feel more secure financially, especially if you are no longer working. An annuity can help you build your income while avoiding taxes, and you can contribute an unrestricted amount to the account. Depending on the contract, annuities may also include a variety of extra benefits, such as death benefits or minimum guaranteed payouts.
Risk: Annuity contracts are notoriously complicated, and if you don’t read the fine print carefully, you could not get precisely what you expect. Because annuities are illiquid, it might be difficult or impossible to break out of one without paying a hefty penalty. If inflation rises significantly in the future, your guaranteed payout may become less appealing.
Learn more:
Before making an investment choice, all investors are urged to perform their own independent research into investment techniques. Furthermore, investors should be aware that historical performance of investment products does not guarantee future price appreciation.