How Do Tax Exempt Bonds Work?

Every state has a state-chartered bond authority. Healthcare facility authority, housing finance agencies, higher education facility authorities, and industrial development finance authorities are all examples of these. Energy efficiency retrofits for existing facilities owned by eligible borrowers are among the projects that are eligible for those powers. The federal tax code defines the following individuals as eligible borrowers for tax-exempt bonds:

Tax-exempt bonds typically have lower interest rates and longer tenors than taxable bonds, making them an ideal and appealing way for qualifying borrowers to fund energy efficiency or renewable energy projects.

The term “tax-exempt” refers to the fact that the interest component of bond debt service payments is exempt from federal and, in some cases, state and local income taxes. As a result, the interest rate will be lower than a taxable bond in terms of credit quality and bond length. Fixed-rate bonds with terms of 10 to 15 years are prevalent. Tax-exempt bonds also have a large market of potential buyers. The ability to sell bonds is always contingent on the borrower’s credit quality, however credit improvements can help the bond’s credit quality.

When clean energy finance initiatives target the eligible industries, state and municipal governments should consider tax-exempt bonds as a financing option because of the lower rate, longer duration, and deep buyer market (listed above). It is recommended that state and municipal governments meet with respective bond authority to discuss how they might engage in local or state financing initiatives.

Bond authorities, as public bodies, are often mission-driven and focused on employing their financial resources for the greater good. To accomplish state economic development goals, such as encouraging lending to small and medium-sized businesses, several authorities also issue taxable bonds and offer other financial products. Bond authorities can serve as a conduit for finance as well as a marketing partner; they already have loan portfolios and can, for example, approach their current borrowers with an offer of energy efficiency or renewable energy engineering evaluations and services, if they are available.

Low-cost funding is helpful in driving project development, but it must be combined with marketing and project development. Bond authorities and state and local government energy efficiency finance initiatives could establish natural alliances. Utilities, energy efficiency and service companies, end-user associations (for hospitals, higher education, private schools, and industry), and others can pool their resources to generate project deal flow and market energy efficiency/renewable energy finance products that the bond authority can arrange.

Private Placements Versus Capital Markets Bond Sales

Loans for energy efficiency retrofits of existing facilities are typically minimal, ranging from $75,000 to $150,000. When it comes to arranging funding, streamlining bond issuance procedures, managing transaction costs, and finding interested bond purchasers, these tiny loan sums might be difficult.

Bond authorities are, in general, conduits for financing rather than lenders. That is, they issue bonds, but bond purchasers must be found and the borrower’s credit must be approved. Bonds can be offered in the capital markets as a public sale with a credit rating from a bond rating agency like Fitch or Standard & Poor’s, or as a private placement to a bond purchaser without a credit rating. A private placement might be as small as $500,000 or as large as $1 million. For smaller bond offerings, certain authorities have established expedited methods.

A public bond sale’s minimum size is usually in the $10 million to $20 million range, if not considerably more. Credit improvements and letters of credit can frequently assist in obtaining a rating from the rating agencies. Some bond authority can fund projects with their own funds, then pool them and refinance via a bond issue. Alternatively, the bond authorities might collaborate with a partner financial institution to originate renewable energy loans, which could subsequently be pooled for refinancing via a bond sale.

Is it wise to invest in tax-free bonds?

Tax-free bonds are a great option for investors looking for a steady stream of income, such as older citizens. Because government entities normally issue these bonds for a longer period of time, the danger of default is low, and you are guaranteed a fixed income for a longer period of time, typically 10 years or more.

The money raised through the issue of these bonds is invested in infrastructure and housing projects by government enterprises. For investors in the highest tax bracket, tax-free bonds are the best option.

Tax-free bonds are preferred by high-net-worth individuals, HUF members, trusts, co-operative banks, and qualified institutional investors.

What is the rate of interest on tax-free bonds?

A tax-exempt bond is a type of security issued by a school to help pay for a project. They typically have interest rates that are 20% to 40% cheaper than other funding sources, such as a traditional bank loan.

How do municipal debts get repaid?

Municipal bonds are worth considering if your primary investing goal is to protect capital while receiving a tax-free income stream. Municipal bonds (also known as munis) are debt obligations issued by government agencies. When you purchase a municipal bond, you are essentially lending money to the issuer in exchange for a specified number of interest payments over a set period of time. When the bond reaches its maturity date at the end of that time, you will receive the whole amount of your initial investment back.

Are tax-free bonds considered income?

  • Municipal bond interest is tax-free in the United States, however there may be state or local taxes, or both.
  • Be aware that if you receive Social Security, your bond interest will be recognized as income when determining your Social Security taxable amount. This could result in you owing more money.
  • Municipal bond interest rates are often lower than corporate bond interest rates. You must decide which deal offers the best genuine return.
  • On the bright side, compared to practically any other investment, highly-rated municipal bonds are often relatively safe. The default rate is quite low.
  • Interest rate risk exists with any bond. You’ll be stuck with a bad performer if your money is locked up for 10 or 20 years and interest rates climb.

NHAI or REC: which bond is better?

REC bonds have a somewhat higher rating than NHAI bonds. Because NHAI bondholders must request for surrender of bonds at maturity, which is after 5 years, and only then is the maturity amount redeemed and paid by cheque or ECS. It will be automatically redeemed and paid by check or ECS in the case of REC bonds.

What can I do to lower my taxable income?

So, let’s get down to business! Is it possible for the typical American to pay no taxes? Indeed, some taxpayers could pay no tax, even if their investment income exceeds $100,000. Regardless of your income or net worth, it’s prudent to take advantage of all applicable tax deductions and credits.

John: 23 Year Old Recent College Grad

In the first scenario, John, a 23-year-old, wishes to limit his tax bill to a minimum. John recently graduated from college and began full-time work at a salary of $30,000 for an entry-level position. He was able to live frugally while in college and is willing to continue living like a college student for a few more years. He studied finance in college, so he understands the power of compounding investment returns. He understands that investments made while he is still in his twenties will increase for decades, ensuring a secure retirement.

John feels comfortable living on $1,300 per month out of his $2,500 monthly earnings since he has housemates who split the rent and utilities. John makes a $1,000 monthly contribution to his employer’s 401k account. This leaves $200 every paycheck to cover withholding for Social Security and Medicare taxes.

After removing the $12,000 John contributes to his 401k during the year, John’s $30,000 salary becomes $18,000 in adjusted gross income for tax purposes. On $18,000 in income, an individual taxpayer with no dependents will owe $545 in taxes in 2021. John is eligible for the Retirement Savings Contributions Credit because he contributes to his 401k account throughout the year. The credit for John’s retirement savings contributions will be $545. His tax burden will be nil as a result of this credit.

The Retirement Savings Payments Credit, also known as the Saver’s Credit, allows taxpayers to deduct 10%, 20%, or 50% of their contributions to retirement savings accounts like a 401k or an IRA.

The following are the AGI (Adjusted Gross Income) restrictions for claiming the Saver’s Credit in 2021:

  • Individuals with an AGI of less than $19,750, heads of household with an AGI of less than $29,625 and married couples filing jointly with an AGI of less than $39,500 are eligible for a 50% credit, up to $1,000 for individuals and $2,000 for married couples filing jointly.
  • Individuals with AGI between $19,751 and $21,500, heads of household with AGI between $29,626 and $32,250, and married couples filing jointly with AGI between $39,501 and $43,000 are eligible for a 20% credit, up to $400 for individuals and $800 for married couples filing jointly.
  • Individuals with AGI between $21,501 and $33,000, heads of household with AGI between $32,251 and $49,500, and married couples filing jointly with AGI between $43,001 and $66,000 are eligible for a 10% credit, up to $200 for individuals and $400 for married couples filing jointly.

The credit is limited to the total amount of tax owing by the taxpayer. In John’s instance, he is eligible for a Saver’s Credit of up to $1,000. Because his tax cost is only $545 without the Saver’s Credit, the Saver’s Credit is also limited to $545. The Saver’s Credit is not refundable if the credit exceeds the taxpayer’s tax burden, unlike certain other credits (such as the Earned Income Credit and the Additional Child Tax Credit).

Even if John gets a raise, he can maintain his tax bill at zero. His adjusted gross income will remain at $18,000 if he increases his 401k contributions by the amount of his raise each year, and he will continue to earn the Retirement Savings Contributions Credit.

The Smiths: Married Couple, 40 Years Old With Two Kids

Our second example of a household that pays no federal income tax is the Smith family. Mr. and Mrs. Smith are both 40 years old and have two elementary school-aged children. The Smiths make a total of $103,250 each year from their full-time occupations.

The Smiths prioritized retirement savings by maxing out their 401(k) accounts ($19,500 each) and regular IRAs ($6,000 each). They put $51,000 into their retirement funds in total.

Because the Smiths have two elementary school-aged children, they must pay for after-school care during the school year as well as some child care over the summer. The entire expense of child care is $5,000 per year. The Smiths contribute $5,000 to Mrs. Smith’s employer’s daycare flexible spending account, which is deducted from her paycheck before taxes.

Mrs. Smith, on the other hand, contributes $2,750 each year to her healthcare flexible spending account, which is withdrawn pre-tax from her paycheck. With the family’s usual medical and dental expenses, the $2,750 will undoubtedly be used each year.

Their total wages of $104,300 are reduced to an adjusted gross income of $45,550 after these reductions are made from their gross income. On $45,550 in adjusted gross income, a married couple with two children will owe $2,056 in income tax. The Smiths are eligible for a $4,000 child tax credit ($2,000 per child). They are eligible to take $1,944 as a refundable credit and $2,056 as a non-refundable credit to reduce their income tax liability.

Their $2,056 in tax credits totally offset the tax liability they would have had on their $45,550 adjusted gross income otherwise. The Smiths will have no tax liability and will be eligible for a refundable tax credit. Despite having a six-figure gross income, the Smiths are able to keep their federal income tax bill to zero by utilizing a variety of tax credits and deductions.

The Jacksons: Married Couple, 55 Years Old, Empty Nesters

The Jackson family will be our third case study in how ordinary people might avoid paying federal income taxes. The Jacksons earn a total of $105,550 per year.

Mr. and Mrs. Jackson have raised two great children and plan to retire in the next five years. The two Jackson kids have graduated from college and are no longer financially reliant on their 55-year-old parents. The Jacksons are also pleased to have recently completed the repayment of their 30-year mortgage on the home they purchased as newlyweds.

The Jacksons have more disposable income now that their children have moved out and the house has been paid off. Mr. and Mrs. Jackson are approaching retirement age and want to put their extra cash to good use by accelerating their retirement funds.

The Jacksons are in luck since IRS rules allow taxpayers over the age of 50 to make a charitable contribution “contributions to their 401ks and IRAs to “catch up.” A person over the age of 50 can make an additional $6,500 catch-up contribution to their 401k and $1,000 catch-up contribution to their IRA. This implies that taxpayers over the age of 50 can contribute a total of $26,000 to a 401k and $7,000 to an IRA each year. These catch-up contributions are also available to spouses who are 50 or older. The Jacksons contribute the maximum amount to their 401ks and traditional IRAs (including catch-up contributions), which is $66,000 for 2021.

Mr. and Mrs. Jackson are in good health right now, but they want to make sure they have enough money set aside to cover healthcare costs in retirement. Mr. Jackson contributes the maximum amount of $8,200 to his employer’s Health Savings Account.

A Health Savings Account (HSA) allows most families to contribute up to $7,200. (or HSA). However, catch-up provisions for taxpayers aged 55 and over allow them to contribute a further $1,000, for a total contribution of $8,200. If funds deposited to an HSA are not spent, they stay in the account year after year (in contrast to flexible spending accounts whose remaining balances are mostly forfeited at the end of the year).

The Jacksons have certain investments that they manage themselves in a brokerage account. Mrs. Jackson enjoys supervising the various holdings “From these taxable investments, he “harvests” at least $3,000 per year in tax losses.

The Jacksons lower their $113,750 earned income to an adjusted gross income of $36,550 after deducting their 401k and IRA contributions, health savings account contributions, and capital loss deduction.

The tax liability on $36,550 in income (after the standard deduction) for a married couple with no additional dependents is $1,145. The Jacksons are eligible for the Retirement Savings Contributions Credit, which will lower their tax burden even further.

Married couples with an adjusted gross income of up to $36,550 can claim a 50 percent credit on up to $4,000 in retirement contributions. The Jacksons would receive a $2,000 tax credit as a result of this. The credit is limited to the amount of tax owing by the taxpayers, which for the Jacksons is $1,145. The Jacksons take advantage of the $1,145 Retirement Savings Contributions Credit, which lowers their tax bill to zero.

The Millers:30-Something Married Couple, 3 Young Children

Between salaries and moderate investment income, the Millers, a couple in their 30s with three small children, will earn around $150,000 in 2021.

Their gross incomes, as well as any deductions for retirement savings, child care, flexible spending accounts, health savings accounts, health insurance, and dental insurance, are shown in this table. After all deductions, their combined gross wages of $150,000 are lowered to a net of $83,700 (a nearly 56% reduction):

The earned and investment income, as well as a series of deductions, including capital losses through tax loss harvesting, are indicated in the second table. The Millers received $4,714 in child non-refundable tax credits because they have three children. They also had $300 of their investment income withheld as foreign tax, resulting in a $300 foreign income tax credit. A $1,286 refundable child tax credit was also available.

Their eligible dividends were also taxed at zero percent because their taxable income was less than $80,800, the 15% capital gains level.

They were able to not only zero out their tax due, but also obtain a $1,286 refund, thanks to both the non-refundable and refundable Child Tax Credits.

How to Reduce Taxable Income

It isn’t difficult to file a 1040 with no tax burden if you plan beforehand. The four instances in this article depict taxpayers at various periods of life who were able to cut their tax burden significantly. Despite earning six figures, three of the sample households were able to lower their tax burden to zero.

How did these folks achieve a tax bill of zero dollars, and how could you lower yours?

  • Participate in employer-sponsored child care and healthcare savings accounts.
  • Pay attention to tax credits such as the child tax credit and the credit for retirement savings contributions.
  • Make sure you’re investing in the most tax-effective way possible. Our free guide, 5 Tax Hacks for Investors, contains our best advice.

Even if you have a significant salary, careful tax preparation can reduce your tax bill to nearly nothing.

Is it wise to invest in I bonds?

  • I bonds are a smart cash investment since they are guaranteed and provide inflation-adjusted interest that is tax-deferred. After a year, they are also liquid.
  • You can purchase up to $15,000 in I bonds per calendar year, in both electronic and paper form.
  • I bonds earn interest and can be cashed in during retirement to ensure that you have secure, guaranteed investments.
  • The term “interest” refers to a mix of a fixed rate and the rate of inflation. The interest rate for I bonds purchased between November 2021 and April 2022 was 7.12 percent.

Municipal bonds make sense at what tax rate?

This is where you decide whether or not a muni is right for you. Divide its return, say 1.20 percent, by your reciprocal rate of 68 percent to get 1.76 percent. That’s your tax-equivalent yield—or, to put it another way, your muni tipping point. It means that, assuming all other factors such as maturity and rating are identical, a taxable bond must yield more than 1.76 percent to make more sense for someone in your tax bracket than a 1.20 percent tax-exempt bond.

What is the average yield on tax-exempt municipal bonds?

The top five municipal bond funds are ranked by their one-year trailing total return (TTM) as of the market close on December 10, 2021. The funds were chosen from a collection of funds that are open to new investors, need a $1,000 minimum initial investment, and have at least $50 million in assets under management (AUM). The first four funds are all Morningstar-rated “Over the last year, the “High Yield Muni” category has averaged a total return of 6.0 percent. The last fund is owned by the “Muni National Intermediate” with a total return of 1.9 percent throughout the same time period.