Is Binance Futures Halal?

Futures transactions, which are popular in today’s stock and commodities markets, are not permitted for two reasons. To begin with, it is a well-established Shariah concept that a sale or purchase cannot be delayed. As a result, in Shariah, all Forward and Futures transactions are invalid.

Is it permissible to trade cryptocurrency futures?

The essential concept of futures trading and transactions is that they are Halal unless the legislator specifies otherwise. Although the shareholder corporation is not governed by Islamic law, its activities and contracts must be legal and ethical.

Can Muslims invest in futures contracts?

Because of the ban on maisir, options, futures, and “other derivatives” are “usually” not employed in Islamic finance (according to Thomson Reuters Practical Law). The “majority of Islamic scholars” consider margin trading, day trading, options, and futures to be illegal by sharia (according to Faleel Jamaldeen). Day trading (which involves buying and selling financial instruments within the same trading day) is not concerned with the underlying product or economic activity of what is traded, whereas margin trading (which involves borrowing money to buy what is being traded) involves interest payments in margin accounts. “Gharar is observed in derivative transactions including as forwards, futures, and options, as well as in short selling and speculation,” according to one source (Investopedia).

Is it forbidden to trade cryptocurrency?

The national council of Islamic experts in Indonesia has declared cryptocurrency trading, such as Bitcoin, to be prohibited for Muslims, as the popularity of digital currencies surges in the world’s largest Muslim-majority country.

Is futures trading considered gambling?

The greatest strategy to avoid gambling in the futures markets (a futures trading gambling hybrid) is to understand a gambling trader’s thinking.

• You forego mathematics, odds-stacking, and serenity in favor of sentiment, hope, and excitementremember, hope is not a plan.
• You trade in a direction but can’t perceive the longer- and shorter-term patterns that surround the trend you’re following.
• You’re trading on a technical level without considering the bigger picture.
• You’re trading purely on the basis of fundamentals without considering the smaller or broader technical picture.
• You are trading sentiment without studying it using several indicators that can help you evaluate whether your sentiment reading is correct or not.
• You’re a poor trader if you refuse to “average down” when the fundamental and technical scenarios favor it (corollary: you’re a poor trader if you refuse to “average down” when the fundamental and technical situations favor it).
• You don’t employ enough indicators to get a variety of viewpoints on the price activity.
• You employ too many indicators, which causes your viewpoints on price activity to get muddled and your answers to become slower.
• You rely on (static) knowledge much too much, preventing your strategy from adapting to your intuitive (“gut”) decisions.
• The manner you incorporate your indicators isn’t adaptable to market fluctuations.
• You choose frequent positive payouts over infrequent negative payouts (the risk-to-reward ratio is badly skewed against you).
• You move around from trading system to trading system, without committing to one that works.
• You continue to rely on a system that has consistently failed to meet its past performance goals.
• You comprehend performance measurements but are unaware that, at your level of trading expertise, you are unable to judge them.
• Your decisions are heavily influenced by your most recent outcomes (recency bias).
• Despite evidence to the contrary, you seek reasons why your method might be correct (confirmation bias).
• You believe in a trading guru without seeing proof that he or she is profitable in the market (versus making money on your tuition).

Is trading forex halal or haram?

Is it permissible to trade forex in a halal or haram manner? Forex trading can be both halal and haram, depending on the investor’s aim and behavior. Trading with an Islamic account and a good strategy is halal, however trading with a standard account and no system is deemed gambling and haram.

Is short selling permissible?

While Shariah prohibits short-selling, an increasing number of Islamic organizations and hedge funds claim to provide Shariah-compliant shorting solutions. Short-selling in Islamic finance is frequently portrayed as a great innovation or a significant breakthrough. In truth, utilizing modern financial engineering techniques, almost any contract may be ‘Islamised.’ The question is rather how high the transaction costs are, and whether or not such mechanics are Shariah-compliant, or whether they are simply an unwelcome trick that undermines Islamic finance’s goals.

This article goes over the basics of conventional shorting before detailing three approaches based on Salam, Arbun, and Wa’d and evaluating the benefits and drawbacks of each.

• The broker examines his portfolio to see if any of his other clients own the asset in question.
• If this is the case, the broker borrows the asset from the customer and sells it to the investor on the market as usual.
• The investor closes out his short position by purchasing the asset on the market at some unspecified future date.
• The broker deposits the acquired item into the account of the client who borrowed the asset.

There are various concerns and dangers associated with conventionalshorting in practice:

• If the broker runs out of shares to borrow at any point, the investor is required to shut out his short position immediately, even if it means losing money.
• The asset’s lender takes on a credit risk with the borrower, and will require security in the form of the cash obtained by the borrower following the asset’s sale.
• Because the asset’s price is likely to vary, a collateral amount greater than the asset’s worth, known as a “hair-cut,” is frequently requested, implying that the investor may not receive the entire short sale proceeds.
• Typically, assets can only be borrowed for short periods of time, ranging from a few hours to a few weeks, with costs rising rapidly as the borrowing duration lengthens.
• Similarly, when demand for borrowing an item exceeds supply, borrowing costs can skyrocket.

Islamic finance provides a natural way to sell assets for a price to be paid up front for an asset to be delivered later with the Salam contract. Salam, which is sometimes related to advance contracts, differs from short-selling in several ways:

• Salamcontracts do not require the underlying asset to be borrowed from a third party. It’s also not the same as naked shorting, which is often limited to aT+3 delivery.
• A Salam contract’s underlying might be a single asset or a basket of securities.
• Salam is a one-on-one contract between two people that has no bearing on anyone else.
• As a result, the investor will not be’short squeezed’ at any point in the future.
• Salam prices are typically lower than market prices for assets, with the discount factoring for counterparty credit risk.
• When determining the price of the Salam, estimated dividends and interest, as well as trading fees, must be taken into account, just as they must be when short-selling.

Arbun can be used to replicate the economic effects of short-selling in a variety of ways:

• Similar to writing a calloption, the selling party accepts a down payment for an asset. When the down payment is set at a high level, near to the market price, the resemblance to short-selling is heightened, as the buyer is economically driven to exercise the option even if prices are decreasing in order to limit his losses. However, such a large down payment would equate to paying an excessive option premium or a combination of Salamand and a forward contract, making it unattractive to many counterparties.
• Alternatively, the selling party could obtain a down payment from a counterparty, as well as a subsequent contractual promise, or Wa’d, from the counterparty to purchase the asset at maturity, even if the market price is lower than the pre-agreed price. Even though this arrangement is not the same as short-selling, the selling party profits from declining prices.

Wa’d, or binding unilateral commitments, can be utilized to simulate short-selling when combined with Murabaha, or deferred payment agreements. Party A buys an asset from party B through a Murabaha for the Murabaha price X, and then sells it to another party for the spot market price. Furthermore, party B makes a unilateral pledge to party A to buy back the asset at a pre-agreed price Y at a later date. Party A, on the other hand, commits to sell the asset to party B at that time and for that price Y.

A forward position on the asset is comparable to a combination of two unilateral commitments. The total payment of the Murabaha transaction and the forward position atmaturity is now zero if the price Y is set equal to the Murabaha price X. Only the ‘borrowed’ asset is’returned,’ which party A must acquire on the market at some unspecified future date before, or at maturity, making the entire arrangement an identical Islamic copy of short-selling. In fact, the agreed-upon forward price Y would be lower than the Murabaha priceX to provide an incentive to the counterparty and to accurately account for predicted dividend yields, brokerage fees, and other borrowing costs.

When it comes to traditional short-selling, there are a few things to keep in mind:

• If the Murabaha and forward repurchase through Wa’d are done directly with the asset owner, it is necessary that this party has a sufficient amount of the needed asset on hand, and that it does not want to retain flexibility in terms of when it sells its assets in the future, because the transaction is fixed-term for the borrower. In this situation, the shorting party would be responsible for paying Wakala fees to its broker, who negotiated the transactions on their behalf.
• If, on the other hand, the Murabaha and the forwardrepurchase through Wa’d are conducted with the shorting party’s prime-broker, who does not possess the asset, the broker must engage in transactions with one of his other clients who does own a sufficient amount of the required asset. In that situation, the broker’s pay would rise and would only be the difference between price X and price Y. In order for the broker to avoid unfavorable market risks, such a strategy necessitates exceedingly cautious structure.
• If all aspects of the structure, including the Murabahatransaction and the Wa’d commitments, are carried out with just one counterparty, the entire process can be viewed as establishing a dummytransaction with the sole goal of allowing Shariah non-compliantshort-selling.

When opposed to traditional short-selling mechanisms, the fact that this type of Wa’d-based short-selling solution is fixed-term for the lending party may increase transaction costs and shorten transaction length.

One of the key advantages of this strategy is that the prime broker handles the procedural complexity, while fund managers don’t have to worry about formal requirements. This allows skilled conventional fund managers to be easily mandated to manage Islamic funds, even if they are unfamiliar with the nuances of Salam or Arbun contracts, for example.