One of the main advantages of ETFs is that they provide more transparency into their holdings than mutual funds. With Wall Street’s reputation at an all-time low, being able to verify your positions on a daily basis (in most situations) is a huge bonus.
Mutual funds are only obligated to reveal their portfolios on a quarterly basis, and then only with a 30-day lag, by law and habit. Investors have no notion if the mutual fund is invested according to its prospectus or if the manager has taken on unnecessary risks between reporting periods. Mutual funds can and do deviate from their stated objectives, a phenomenon known as “style drift,” which can wreak havoc on an investor’s asset allocation strategy.
In other words, buying a mutual fund is a leap of faith—and investors have been burned in the past.
Vanguard’s ETFs, for example, fall short of this ideal metric. ETFs are not required to publish their whole holdings every day by law. There is, however, a catch for those who reveal less regularly.
Every day, ETF issuers publish lists of the assets that an authorized participant (AP) must submit to the ETF in order to create new shares (“creation baskets”), as well as the shares that they would receive if they redeem shares from the ETF (“redemption baskets”). Even for those few ETFs that fall short of the daily-disclosure ideal, this, along with the opportunity to examine the full holdings of the index an ETF aims to track, gives an exceptionally high level of disclosure.
It’s worth noting that all “actively managed” ETFs are required by law to publish their whole portfolio every day. They’re the most open of all the ETFs.
A capital gain is created when a mutual fund or ETF owns securities that have risen in value and sells them for whatever reason. These sales can be the consequence of the fund selling securities as a tactical move, as part of a rebalancing exercise, or to meet shareholder redemptions. If a fund earns capital gains, it is required by law to pay them out to shareholders at the end of the year.
Every year, the typical emerging markets equities mutual fund paid out 6.46 percent of their net asset value (NAV) to owners in capital gains.
ETFs perform significantly better (for reference, the average emerging market ETF paid out 0.01 percent of its NAV as capital gains over the same stretch).
Why? For starters, because ETFs are index funds, they have much lower turnover than actively managed mutual funds and hence accumulate significantly smaller capital gains. But, because to the alchemy of how new ETF shares are produced and redeemed, they’re also more tax efficient than index mutual funds.
When a mutual fund investor requests a withdrawal, the mutual fund must sell securities to raise funds to cover the withdrawal. When an individual investor wishes to sell an ETF, however, he simply sells it like a stock to another investor. For the ETF, there is no bother, no fuss, and no capital gains transaction.
When an AP redeems shares of an ETF from an issuer, what happens? Actually, things improve. When an AP redeems shares, the ETF issuer normally does not rush out to sell equities in order to pay the AP in cash. Instead, the issuer just pays the AP “in kind” by delivering the ETF’s underlying holdings. There will be no capital gains if there is no sale.
The ETF issuer can even pick and choose which shares to give to the AP, ensuring that the shares with the lowest tax basis are passed on to the AP. This leaves the ETF issuer with only shares purchased at or even above the current market price, lowering the fund’s tax burden and, as a result, providing investors with better after-tax returns.
For some ETFs, the mechanism does not work as well as it should. Fixed-income ETFs are less tax efficient than their equities counterparts due to higher turnover and frequent cash-based creations and redemptions.
But, all things being equal, ETFs win hands down, with two decades of evidence demonstrating that they have the best tax efficiency of any fund structure in the industry.
Why are exchange-traded funds (ETFs) more tax-efficient than mutual funds?
Susan Dziubinski: I’m Susan Dziubinski, and I’m Hello, my name is Susan Dziubinski, and I’m with Morningstar. Because they payout smaller and fewer capital gains, exchange-traded funds are more tax-efficient than mutual funds. However, this does not imply that ETFs are tax-free. Ben Johnson joins me to talk about how the capital gains distribution season is shaping out for ETF investors this year. Ben is the worldwide director of ETF research at Morningstar.
How do ETFs help you save money on taxes?
- Due to their unique structure, ETFs receive preferential tax treatment over mutual funds.
- ETF dividends and interest payments are taxed in the same way as the underlying equities or bonds they hold.
- Long-term capital gains rates apply to ETFs held for more than a year, which can be as high as 20%.
What are the tax advantages of ETFs?
When compared to typical mutual funds, ETFs can be more tax efficient. In general, keeping an ETF in a taxable account will result in lower tax liabilities than holding a similarly structured mutual fund.
ETFs and mutual funds have the same tax status as mutual funds, according to the IRS. Both are subject to capital gains and dividend income taxes. ETFs, on the other hand, are constructed in such a way that taxes are minimized for ETF holders, and the final tax bill (after the ETF is sold and capital gains tax is paid) is less than what an investor would have paid with a similarly structured mutual fund.
What is the most tax-efficient ETF?
What is the tax efficiency of ETFs? ETFs, unlike mutual funds, do not typically sell equities to raise cash to cover redemptions. Instead, they use a “in-kind” approach to meet redemptions without having to sell securities and realize capital gains. Almost all ETFs in the United States attempt to track the performance of an index.
Which is better for taxes: an ETF or an index fund?
Long-term investors should use tax-advantaged retirement plans like 401(k)s and IRAs to save for retirement. I say this not only because it’s smart — we all know that lowering taxes means more money in your pocket — but also because it allows you to fully ignore the intricate nuances of the tax implications of various sorts of funds.
Both index funds and exchange-traded funds (ETFs) are exceedingly tax-efficient, far more so than actively managed mutual funds. Index funds rarely trigger capital gains taxes because they buy and sell stocks so infrequently.
ETFs have the upper hand when it comes to tax efficiency. ETFs, unlike index funds, rarely buy or sell stocks for a profit. When a shareholder wishes to redeem their shares, they simply sell them on the stock market, usually to another shareholder.
How do exchange-traded funds (ETFs) avoid capital gains?
- Because of their easy, broad, and low-fee techniques, ETFs have become a popular investment tool. There are no capital gains or taxes when ETFs are merely bought and sold.
- ETFs are often regarded “pass-through” investment vehicles, which means that their shareholders are not exposed to capital gains. However, due to one-time significant transactions or unforeseen situations, ETFs might create capital gains that are transmitted to shareholders on occasion.
- For example, if an ETF needs to substantially rearrange its portfolio due to significant changes in the underlying benchmark, it may experience a capital gain.
What are some of the drawbacks of ETFs?
ETF managers are expected to match the investment performance of their funds to the indexes they monitor. That mission isn’t as simple as it appears. An ETF can deviate from its target index in a variety of ways. Investors may incur a cost as a result of the tracking inaccuracy.
Because indexes do not store cash, while ETFs do, some tracking error is to be expected. Fund managers typically save some cash in their portfolios to cover administrative costs and management fees. Furthermore, dividend timing is challenging since equities go ex-dividend one day and pay the dividend the next, whereas index providers presume dividends are reinvested on the same day the firm went ex-dividend. This is a particular issue for ETFs structured as unit investment trusts (UITs), which are prohibited by law from reinvesting earnings in more securities and must instead hold cash until a dividend is paid to UIT shareholders. ETFs will never be able to precisely mirror a desired index due to cash constraints.
ETFs structured as investment companies under the Investment Company Act of 1940 can depart from the index’s holdings at the fund manager’s discretion. Some indices include illiquid securities that a fund manager would be unable to purchase. In that instance, the fund manager will alter a portfolio by selecting liquid securities from a purchaseable index. The goal is to design a portfolio that has the same appearance and feel as the index and, hopefully, performs similarly. Nonetheless, ETF managers who vary from an index’s holdings often see the fund’s performance deviate as well.
Because of SEC limits on non-diversified funds, several indices include one or two dominant holdings that the ETF management cannot reproduce. Some companies have created targeted indexes that use an equal weighting methodology in order to generate a more diversified sector ETF and avoid the problem of concentrated securities. Equal weighting tackles the problem of concentrated positions, but it also introduces new issues, such as greater portfolio turnover and costs.
How long should an ETF be held?
- If the shares are subject to additional restrictions, such as a tax rate other than the normal capital gains rate,
The holding period refers to how long you keep your stock. The holding period begins on the day your purchase order is completed (“trade date”) and ends on the day your sell order is executed (also known as the “trade date”). Your holding period is unaffected by the date you pay for the shares, which may be several days after the trade date for the purchase, and the settlement date, which may be several days after the trade date for the sell.
- If you own ETF shares for less than a year, the increase is considered a short-term capital gain.
- Long-term capital gain occurs when you hold ETF shares for more than a year.
Long-term capital gains are generally taxed at a rate of no more than 15%. (or zero for those in the 10 percent or 15 percent tax bracket; 20 percent for those in the 39.6 percent tax bracket starting in 2014). Short-term capital gains are taxed at the same rates as your regular earnings. However, only net capital gains are taxed; prior to calculating the tax rates, capital gains might be offset by capital losses. Certain ETF capital gains may not be subject to the 15% /0%/20% tax rate, and instead be taxed at ordinary income rates or at a different rate.
- Gains on futures-contracts ETFs have already been recorded (investors receive a 60 percent / 40 percent split of gains annually).
- For “physically held” precious metals ETFs, grantor trust structures are employed. Investments in these precious metals ETFs are considered collectibles under current IRS guidelines. Long-term gains on collectibles are never eligible for the 20% long-term tax rate that applies to regular equity investments; instead, long-term gains are taxed at a maximum of 28%. Gains on stocks held for less than a year are taxed as ordinary income, with a maximum rate of 39.6%.
- Currency ETN (exchange-traded note) gains are taxed at ordinary income rates.
Even if the ETF is formed as a master limited partnership (MLP), investors receive a Schedule K-1 each year that tells them what profits they should report, even if they haven’t sold their shares. The gains are recorded on a marked-to-market basis, which implies that the 60/40 rule applies; investors pay tax on these gains at their individual rates.
An additional Medicare tax of 3.8 percent on net investment income may be imposed on high-income investors (called the NII tax). Gains on the sale of ETF shares are included in investment income.
ETFs held in tax-deferred accounts: ETFs held in a tax-deferred account, such as an IRA, are not subject to immediate taxation. Regardless of what holdings and activities created the cash, all distributions are taxed as ordinary income when they are distributed from the account. The distributions, however, are not subject to the NII tax.
Are ETFs preferable to stocks?
Consider the risk as well as the potential return when determining whether to invest in stocks or an ETF. When there is a broad dispersion of returns from the mean, stock-picking has an advantage over ETFs. And, with stock-picking, you can use your understanding of the industry or the stock to gain an advantage.
In two cases, ETFs have an edge over stocks. First, an ETF may be the best option when the return from equities in the sector has a tight dispersion around the mean. Second, if you can’t obtain an advantage through company knowledge, an ETF is the greatest option.
To grasp the core investment fundamentals, whether you’re picking equities or an ETF, you need to stay current on the sector or the stock. You don’t want all of your hard work to be undone as time goes on. While it’s critical to conduct research before selecting a stock or ETF, it’s equally critical to conduct research and select the broker that best matches your needs.
Are active exchange-traded funds (ETFs) tax-efficient?
Actively managed ETFs are similar to actively managed mutual funds in that they are actively managed. Both are expected to have higher compositional turnover than their indexed counterparts, and fund managers play a significant role in deciding which holdings to invest in. However, there are a few important distinctions between them.
Actively Managed ETFs Trade Like Stocks
Active exchange-traded funds (ETFs) trade like stocks. Throughout the trading day, they can be bought and sold as often as needed. Mutual funds, on the other hand, only trade once a day, at the end of the trading day.
For investors who want to add some active management to their portfolios, this disparity may not be significant. Both types of actively managed funds have managers who react to market developments in real time, and investors purchase a fund to benefit from its longer-term investing strategy.
The stock-like tradability of actively managed ETFs is important for another reason: You’ll need to stick with active ETFs if you want to buy an actively managed fund in a margin account. You can’t buy mutual funds on margin in most situations.
Actively Managed ETFs Offer Better Tax Efficiency
The tax efficiency of an actively managed ETF is one of its largest benefits. ETFs have fewer taxable events than mutual funds since your money is used to purchase what are known as creation units rather than fund assets.
“Because mutual funds’ assets are purchased and sold, gains are distributed rapidly, according to Meadows. “You’ll have to pay capital gains taxes, which could be low or substantial, depending on how frequently the securities are exchanged in and out of the fund.”
When you sell your ETF shares, however, you only receive capital gains. For those who have active funds in retirement accounts such as 401(k) or Individual retirement accounts, this distinction may be less important (IRAs). Active ETFs, on the other hand, may offer tax advantages to investors who invest in taxable brokerage accounts.
Actively Managed ETFs Have Lower Investment Minimums
To buy mutual fund shares, you may need to meet a high investment minimum, depending on the broker. These minimums can be thousands of dollars, which can make it difficult to invest in a fund. Because ETFs have lower investment minimums than active funds, you may be able to get started investing in an active fund sooner or with a lower initial investment.
Mutual Funds Offer Less Transparency
Friedman claims that, despite the SEC’s new guidelines allowing for less openness in actively managed ETFs, mutual funds remain the least transparent investment vehicle.
“Actively managed ETFs must nonetheless reveal their tracking baskets more frequently, according to Friedman. “Mutual funds may only have to report their holdings once a quarter and are not required to reveal as much information.”
If fund transparency is important to you, actively managed ETFs may be preferable to actively managed mutual funds.