- To impact economic performance, the US government employs two types of policies: monetary policy and fiscal policy. Both have the same goal in mind: to assist the economy in achieving full employment and price stability.
- It is carried out by the Federal Reserve System (“the Fed”), an independent government institution with the authority to control the money supply and interest rates.
- When the Fed believes inflation is a problem, it will employ contractionary policy, which involves reducing the money supply and raising interest rates. It will utilize expansionary policies to boost the money supply and lower interest rates in order to combat a recession.
- When the economy is in a slump, the government will either raise spending, lower taxes, or do both to stimulate the economy.
- When inflation occurs, the government will either cut spending or raise taxes, or both.
- A surplus occurs when the government collects more money (via taxes) than it spends in a given year.
- When the government spends more money than it receives, we have a budget deficit.
- The national debtthe total amount of money owed by the federal governmentis the sum of all deficits.
How can we address the recession issue?
A drop in demand within the economy whether from businesses, consumers, the government, or other countries is the primary cause of an economic recession. As a result, the most effective response will be determined by the recession’s core cause.
If consumer spending is down, it might be a good idea to lower taxes. This will provide them with additional cash and encourage increased economic spending. A slowdown in corporate investment, on the other hand, may necessitate lower interest rates in order to reduce debt burdens.
Reduce Taxes
When governments lower taxes, they frequently do so at the expense of increasing the budget deficit. The government obtains fewer tax revenues but maintains the same level of spending, giving the economy a benefit overall. While this raises the budget deficit, it also increases the amount of money in the hands of the typical consumer.
Can the government avert a downturn?
Understanding how government purchases affect overall economic output is crucial to developing fiscal policy. In normal times, research reveals that increasing government spending is ineffective at stimulating the economy. When monetary policy is restrained near the zero lower bound, however, public expenditure becomes more potent and can be an effective approach to avoid a recession.
What steps can the government take to boost the economy?
Consumers will benefit from tax cuts and refunds because they will have more money in their pockets. In an ideal world, these customers spend a part of their money at numerous businesses, boosting sales, cash flow, and profits. Companies with more cash have the resources to raise finance, upgrade technology, expand, and grow. All of these behaviors boost productivity, which boosts economic growth. Proponents claim that tax cuts and refunds allow customers to stimulate the economy by injecting more money into it.
What can the government do to assist the economy?
Governments maintain the legal and social framework, provide public goods and services, redistribute income, mitigate externalities, and stabilize the economy.
How can we avoid a downturn in the economy?
It is well understood how an increase in oil prices can have a knock-on effect on practically everything in the market. Consumers lose purchasing power as a result, which might lead to a drop in demand.
Loss of consumer confidence
Consumers will change their purchasing habits and eventually limit demand for goods and services if they lose faith in the economy.
Signs of an upcoming economic depression
There are several things that individuals should be aware of before an economic downturn occurs so that they can be prepared. The following are some of them:
Worsening unemployment rate
A rising unemployment rate is frequently a precursor to a coming economic downturn. Consumers will lose purchasing power as the unemployment rate rises, resulting in decreasing demand.
Rising inflation
Inflation can be a sign that demand is increasing due to rising wages and a strong workforce. Inflationary pressures, on the other hand, can deter individuals from spending, resulting in decreasing demand for goods and services.
Declining property sales
Consumer expenditure, including property sales, is often high in an ideal economic condition. When an impending economic downturn occurs, however, home sales decline, reflecting a loss of trust in the economy.
Increasing credit card debt defaults
When people use their credit cards a lot, it usually means they’re spending money, which is good for the economy. When debt defaults mount, however, it may indicate that people are losing their ability to pay, signaling an economic downturn.
Ways to prevent another economic depression
There is always the worry of another ‘Great Depression,’ which is why economists recommend the following strategies to prevent it from happening.
What role did the government play in the 2008 financial crisis?
The Great Recession lasted from December 2007 to June 2009, making it the longest downturn since World War II. The Great Recession was particularly painful in various ways, despite its short duration. From its peak in 2007Q4 to its bottom in 2009Q2, real gross domestic product (GDP) plummeted 4.3 percent, the greatest drop in the postwar era (based on data as of October 2013). The unemployment rate grew from 5% in December 2007 to 9.5 percent in June 2009, before peaking at 10% in October 2009.
The financial repercussions of the Great Recession were also disproportionate: home prices plummeted 30% on average from their peak in mid-2006 to mid-2009, while the S&P 500 index dropped 57% from its peak in October 2007 to its trough in March 2009. The net worth of US individuals and charity organizations dropped from around $69 trillion in 2007 to around $55 trillion in 2009.
As the financial crisis and recession worsened, worldwide policies aimed at reviving economic growth were enacted. Like many other countries, the United States enacted economic stimulus measures that included a variety of government expenditures and tax cuts. The Economic Stimulus Act of 2008 and the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 were two of these projects.
The Federal Reserve’s response to the financial crisis varied over time and included a variety of unconventional approaches. Initially, the Federal Reserve used “conventional” policy actions by lowering the federal funds rate from 5.25 percent in September 2007 to a range of 0-0.25 percent in December 2008, with the majority of the drop taking place between January and March 2008 and September and December 2008. The significant drop in those periods represented a significant downgrading in the economic outlook, as well as increasing downside risks to output and inflation (including the risk of deflation).
By December 2008, the federal funds rate had reached its effective lower bound, and the FOMC had begun to utilize its policy statement to provide future guidance for the rate. The phrasing mentioned keeping the rate at historically low levels “for some time” and later “for an extended period” (Board of Governors 2008). (Board of Governors 2009a). The goal of this guidance was to provide monetary stimulus through lowering the term structure of interest rates, raising inflation expectations (or lowering the likelihood of deflation), and lowering real interest rates. With the sluggish and shaky recovery from the Great Recession, the forward guidance was tightened by adding more explicit conditionality on specific economic variables such as inflation “low rates of resource utilization, stable inflation expectations, and tame inflation trends” (Board of Governors 2009b). Following that, in August 2011, the explicit calendar guidance of “At least through mid-2013, the federal funds rate will remain at exceptionally low levels,” followed by economic-threshold-based guidance for raising the funds rate from its zero lower bound, with the thresholds based on the unemployment rate and inflationary conditions (Board of Governors 2012). This forward guidance is an extension of the Federal Reserve’s conventional approach of influencing the funds rate’s current and future direction.
The Fed pursued two more types of policy in addition to forward guidance “During the Great Recession, unorthodox” policy initiatives were taken. Credit easing programs, as explored in more detail in “Federal Reserve Credit Programs During the Meltdown,” were one set of unorthodox policies that aimed to facilitate credit flows and lower credit costs.
The large scale asset purchase (LSAP) programs were another set of non-traditional policies. The asset purchases were done with the federal funds rate near zero to help lower longer-term public and private borrowing rates. The Federal Reserve said in November 2008 that it would buy US agency mortgage-backed securities (MBS) and debt issued by housing-related US government agencies (Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac, and the Federal Home Loan banks). 1 The asset selection was made in part to lower the cost and increase the availability of finance for home purchases. These purchases aided the housing market, which was at the heart of the crisis and recession, as well as improving broader financial conditions. The Fed initially planned to acquire up to $500 billion in agency MBS and $100 billion in agency debt, with the program being expanded in March 2009 and finished in 2010. The FOMC also announced a $300 billion program to buy longer-term Treasury securities in March 2009, which was completed in October 2009, just after the Great Recession ended, according to the National Bureau of Economic Research. The Federal Reserve purchased approximately $1.75 trillion of longer-term assets under these programs and their expansions (commonly known as QE1), with the size of the Federal Reserve’s balance sheet increasing by slightly less because some securities on the balance sheet were maturing at the same time.
However, real GDP is only a little over 4.5 percent above its prior peak as of this writing in 2013, and the jobless rate remains at 7.3 percent. With the federal funds rate at zero and the current recovery slow and sluggish, the Federal Reserve’s monetary policy plan has evolved in an attempt to stimulate the economy and meet its statutory mandate. The Fed has continued to change its communication policies and implement more LSAP programs since the end of the Great Recession, including a $600 billion Treasuries-only purchase program in 2010-11 (often known as QE2) and an outcome-based purchase program that began in September 2012. (in addition, there was a maturity extension program in 2011-12 where the Fed sold shorter-maturity Treasury securities and purchased longer-term Treasuries). Furthermore, the increasing attention on financial stability and regulatory reform, the economic consequences of the European sovereign debt crisis, and the restricted prospects for global growth in 2013 and 2014 reflect how the Great Recession’s fallout is still being felt today.
How can a government maintain a country’s currency value?
The Fed regulates the money supply with three primary tools: open-market operations, the discount rate, and reserve requirements. The first is, without a doubt, the most crucial. The Fedor a central bankinfluences the money supply and interest rates by purchasing and selling government securities (typically bonds).