As an assistant secretary of the Treasury in the early 1970s and as president of the Federal Reserve Bank of New York beginning in 1975, Volcker advocated for this type of strategy. However, he did not believe the Minnesota analysis was valid. Rather, Volcker claimed that the only way to stop inflation was to plunge the economy into a severe and prolonged downturn. It was the cost that America had to pay.
These policies did, in fact, plunge the country into a prolonged recession that lasted until 1983.
Minnesota’s costless (or at least low-cost) inflation reduction analysis was incorrect.
However, Volcker’s actions were successful in halting the inflationary trend. Inflation dropped from 14% in 1980 to 3% in 1983, and has remained very low and stable since then.
Lessons of the 1970s
The experience of the 1970s taught economists and those in charge of economic policy two significant lessons:
- If inflation begins to accelerate, raise interest rates, cause a recession, and put a stop to the inflationary trend.
As a result, a new synthesis in macroeconomic theory evolved, which has been central to much economic research since the 1980s. There are three pillars to this framework:
- There is a trade-off between inflation and unemployment in the near run (and this justifies the Volcker approach).
- However, policy expectations are important, and we must keep inflation under control so that people do not expect rising inflation.
- As a result, there is no trade-off between unemployment and inflation in the long run.
What was Paul Volcker’s strategy for combating inflation?
Bullard was, in fact, responding to this question. “Would it be a serious issue if inflation came in a little bit higher?” the interviewer wondered. I’ll quote Bullard’s response word for word (my emphasis):
Inflation forecasting models aren’t very good. The risk would be that inflation would be even higher in 2022, possibly much higher, and the committee would be forced to go into inflation-fighting mode. That’s what I’ve been worried about: we’re not prepared for that scenario in 2022, and if we had to raise rates quickly, it would be very disruptive for markets.
If inflation does not reduce and remains high, or perhaps rises, we will need to turn to a monetary policy that genuinely puts downward pressure on inflation. That would be a long way off from where we are currently. So I’ve been emphasizing that we’re not in a position to deal with that scenario.
Bullard is accurate in my opinion, but he doesn’t appear to comprehend how the Fed was able to achieve this goal the last time it had to actively put downward pressure on price inflation. Here’s how the Fed would potentially approach getting ahead of increased consumer costs, according to Bullard (emphasis mine):
We’d have to stop buying assets and raise the policy rate above whatever you think the neutral policy rate is. These are the steps that would have to be taken to begin putting downward pressure on inflation, and if we had to do so quickly, financial markets and global financial markets would be severely disrupted.
However, there is a problem. Volcker’s Fed did not genuinely target a policy rate during the period 1977-1981. When Volcker took over in August 1979, he immediately moved into full-fledged crisis mode, but he made it clear that he wasn’t pursuing any particular federal funds rate. He did it by directly attacking the money supply, also known as “the aggregates” at the time. Rather than treating the fed funds rate as a target in and of itself, Volcker’s plan was to triangulate money supply growth using the fed funds target range.
He did this because of supply and demand, which is simple economics 101. The supply and demand for dollars versus the supply and demand for other products and services is what sets dollar prices of goods and services. If you can keep the money supply under control, you can restore confidence in the dollar, which was experiencing a significant confidence crisis at the moment.
How did Volcker keep inflation under control?
Paul Volcker, the former chairman of the Federal Reserve, has died at the age of 92. He was known for adopting drastic measures to tame America’s out-of-control inflation in the 1980s and advocating for Wall Street reforms in the aftermath of the financial crisis.
In 1979, when the US economy was experiencing catastrophic inflation, President Jimmy Carter appointed the towering 6-foot-7 Volcker as the Fed’s chairman. To manage inflation and bring down consumer prices, Volcker, who led the central bank until 1987, drove interest rates to unprecedented highs, creating a recession.
The action, which was unpopular at the time with many Americans, served to keep inflation in check, and the economy finally recovered.
“Paul was as obstinate as he was tall, and while some of his initiatives as Fed chairman were politically risky, they were the correct thing to do,” Carter said in a statement released Monday. “His firm and astute leadership contributed to the reduction of petroleum-driven inflation, easing the strain on all Americans’ budgets.”
How does the Federal Reserve combat inflation?
Interest rates are the Fed’s major weapon in the fight against inflation. According to Yiming Ma, an assistant finance professor at Columbia University Business School, it does so by determining the short-term borrowing rate for commercial banks, which the banks subsequently pass on to consumers and businesses.
This rate affects everything from credit card interest to mortgages and car loans, increasing the cost of borrowing. On the other hand, it increases interest rates on high-yield savings accounts.
Higher rates and the economy
But how do higher interest rates bring inflation under control? By causing the economy to slow down.
“When the economy needs it, the Fed uses interest rates as a gas pedal or a brake,” said Greg McBride, chief financial analyst at Bankrate. “With high inflation, they can raise interest rates and use this to put the brakes on the economy in order to bring inflation under control.”
What was the mechanism of the Volcker shock?
Jonathan Levy, a history professor and economic historian at the University of Chicago, spoke at the Nelson A. Rockefeller Center on Tuesday, February 5, 2019. His presentation, titled “Instability and Inequality: American Capitalism after the Volcker Shock of 1980” discussed the role of the US Federal Reserve in global economic policymaking, the links between inequality and the Great Recession, and the causes of current economic upheavals.
“The action is back in history departments,” according to Levy, after a brief shift to economics departments in the 1970s and 1980s. “Especially after 2008 and the Great Recession, historians have become more interested in economic concerns than they were previously,” he said.
After the fall of the Soviet Union, Levy became interested in economic history, as a consensus arose regarding the importance of economic history “Globalization, the new economy, technology.” He described the time since as “dramatic.” “We’re still living in the political aftermath of the financial crisis of 2007-2008 and the Great Recession that followed,” he said. Because of this, he has concentrated his studies on recent economic history “Students in my classes wanted the story to continue through 2008 in order to understand the Great Recession.”
He pointed to the 1980s as a significant juncture in the world economy. The previous decade was marked by growing inflation, declining male employment, and an increase in the number of women in the workforce “A catastrophe that affects everyone. “The “Volcker Shock,” named after then-Federal Reserve Chairman Paul Volcker, is shorthand for the rapid rise in interest rates and subsequent recessions in 1981-1982,” according to Levy “induces a sharp recession that purges all kinds of unprofitable fixed capital… as well as a shift in capital investment into financial forms.”
High interest rates bolstered the dollar’s international worth and encouraged foreign investment in American assets, particularly the stock market. This, in turn, bolstered high-wage service jobs while hastening the loss of industrial jobs. “By the 1980s, you’ve got a completely different political economy,” Levy observed. “Investment in physical assets such as factories is shrinking, and capital is shifting to financial assets. It invests in equities, bonds, and real estate, among other things. You’re not hiring as many employees as you used to.”
He linked this to rising economic disparity in the United States. According to Levy, high-paying service industries such as bankers, lawyers, and accountants created a need for low-wage jobs that catered to their demands, such as nannies, restaurant employees, and home healthcare workers. “So you gut the middle, which was related to male factory jobs, and boost the economy at the top and bottom.”
This shift, according to Levy, “It wasn’t all horrible,” says the narrator. He observed that the postwar, pre-Volcker economy benefited high school-educated white males but not women or minorities. The new economy, on the other hand, is “Tumultuous.” “It’s sparked a slew of new discontents about the quality of labor in the service industry, particularly in terms of wage disparities and wealth and income disparities.”
He linked these dissatisfactions to current political events, such as President Trump’s nostalgic appeal “Restore America’s Greatness.” Levy also pointed out that politicians on the left who lament for the postwar economy’s wealth distribution are nostalgic as well. “It seems me that you would not want to go back to men working eight hours a day in steel mills, where the average life expectancy was 56 and you were deaf by the age of 40,” he remarked. We have to reassess what it means to have respectable employment.”
Gender, according to Levy, is crucial in the discussion of respectable employment. “The service industry is “usually viewed as gendered and unworthy of being compared to dignified masculine labor,” according to Levy. “In today’s postindustrial economy, considering the positive qualities of that labor that people are socially connected, that they deal with one another, that they support one another as worthy of dignity” is critical.
Levy highlighted the uncertainties the Federal Reserve had when making choices on the Volcker Shock in his talk. According to records of Federal Reserve meetings, Volcker merely noted that at one time “Everything is open to speculation. “I have no idea how to do this.” Yet, according to Levy, Volcker’s efforts triggered an economic reboot, securing the dollar’s worldwide primacy and encouraging investors to keep their investment options open. It sparked debate over who should do what work and jolted the political system into a new paradigm. “The current moment started in the 1980s,” Levy added. It remains to be seen how the US responds to that situation.
Kyle Mullins, 22, is a student program assistant for public programs at the Rockefeller Center.
The speaker’s views and opinions, as well as any materials presented during a public session, are his or her own and do not necessarily reflect the Rockefeller Center’s views or constitute an endorsement by the Center.
What is the Volcker rule, and why and when did it come into effect?
The rule’s beginnings stretch back to 2009, when Volcker recommended a piece of regulation to bar banks from speculating in the markets in reaction to the ongoing financial crisis (and after the nation’s major banks acquired substantial losses from their proprietary trading units). Volcker sought to reestablish the distinction between commercial and investment banking, which had previously existed but had been legalized by the partial repeal of the Glass-Steagall Act in 1999.
When did Volcker bring inflation under control?
In the face of substantially rising inflation expectations apparent in bond rates in early 1980, the Volcker Fed’s policy initiatives in 1979 and 1980, including the acclaimed October 1979 announcement of new operating procedures with a stronger emphasis on money, just restrained inflation.
What caused the recession of the 1980s?
The 1981-82 recession was the greatest economic slump in the United States since the Great Depression, prior to the 2007-09 recession. Indeed, the over 11% unemployment rate attained in late 1982 remains the postwar era’s pinnacle (Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis). During the 1981-82 recession, unemployment was widespread, but manufacturing, construction, and the auto industries were especially hard hit. Despite the fact that goods manufacturers accounted for only 30% of overall employment at the time, they lost 90% of their jobs in 1982. Manufacturing accounted for three-quarters of all job losses in the goods-producing sector, with unemployment rates of 22% and 24%, respectively, in the home building and auto manufacturing industries (Urquhart and Hewson 1983, 4-7).
The economy was already in poor health prior to the slump, with unemployment hovering at 7.5 percent following a recession in 1980. Tight monetary policy in an attempt to combat rising inflation sparked both the 1980 and 1981-82 recessions. During the 1960s and 1970s, economists and politicians thought that raising inflation would reduce unemployment, a tradeoff known as the Phillips Curve. In the 1970s, the Fed used a “stop-go” monetary strategy, in which it alternated between combating high unemployment and high inflation. The Fed cut interest rates during the “go” periods in order to loosen the money supply and reduce unemployment. When inflation rose during the “stop” periods, the Fed raised interest rates to lessen inflationary pressure. However, as inflation and unemployment rose concurrently in the mid-1970s, the Phillips Curve tradeoff proved unstable in the long run. While unemployment was on the decline towards the end of the decade, inflation remained high, hitting 11% in June 1979. (Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis).
Because of his anti-inflation ideas, Paul Volcker was chosen chairman of the Federal Reserve in August 1979. He had previously served as president of the New York Fed, where he had expressed his displeasure with Fed actions that he believed contributed to rising inflation expectations. In terms of future economic stability, he believes that rising inflation should be the Fed’s top concern: “It is what is going to give us the most troubles and cause the biggest recession” (FOMC transcript 1979, 16). He also thought the Fed had a credibility problem when it comes to controlling inflation. The Fed had proved in the preceding decade that it did not place a high priority on maintaining low inflation, and the public’s belief that this conduct would continue would make it increasingly difficult for the Fed to drive inflation down. “Failure to continue the fight against inflation now would simply make any subsequent effort more difficult,” he said (Volcker 1981b).
Instead of focusing on interest rates, Volcker altered the Fed’s policy to aggressively target the money supply. He chose this strategy for two reasons. To begin with, rising inflation made it difficult to determine which interest rate targets were suitable. Due to the expectation of inflation, the nominal interest rates the Fed targeted could be relatively high, but the real interest rates (that is, the effective interest rates after adjusting for inflation) could still be quite low. Second, the new policy was intended to show the public that the Federal Reserve was serious about keeping inflation low. The anticipation of low inflation was significant, as present inflation is influenced in part by future inflation forecasts.
Volcker’s initial efforts to reduce inflation and inflationary expectations were ineffective. The Carter administration’s credit-control scheme, which began in March 1980, triggered a severe recession (Schreft 1990). As unemployment rose, the Fed relented, reverting to the “stop-go” practices that the public had grown accustomed to. The Fed tightened the money supply further in late 1980 and early 1981, causing the federal funds rate to approach 20%. Long-term interest rates, despite this, have continued to grow. The ten-year Treasury bond rate surged from around 11% in October 1980 to more than 15% a year later, probably due to market expectations that the Fed would soften its restrictive monetary policy if unemployment soared (Goodfriend and King 2005). Volcker, on the other hand, was insistent that the Fed not back down this time: “We have set our course to control money and credit growth.” We intend to stay the course” (Volcker 1981a).
High interest rates put pressure on sectors of the economy that rely on borrowing, such as manufacturing and construction, and the economy officially entered a recession in the third quarter of 1981. Unemployment increased from 7.4% at the beginning of the recession to nearly 10% a year later. Volcker faced repeated calls from Congress to loosen monetary policy as the recession worsened, but he insisted that failing to lower long-run inflation expectations now would result in “more catastrophic economic situations over a much longer period of time” (Monetary Policy Report 1982, 67).
This perseverance paid off in the end. Inflation had dropped to 5% by October 1982, and long-term interest rates had begun to fall. The Fed permitted the federal funds rate to drop to 9%, and unemployment fell fast from over 11% at the end of 1982 to 8% a year later (Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis; Goodfriend and King 2005). Inflation was still a threat, and the Fed would have to deal with several “inflation scares” during the 1980s. However, Volcker’s and his successors’ dedication to actively pursue price stability helped ensure that the 1970s’ double-digit inflation did not reappear.
How quickly did Volcker hike rates?
On August 6, 1979, Paul A. Volcker was elected chairman of the Federal Reserve System’s Board of Governors. On August 6, 1983, he was reappointed for a second term, which he held until August 11, 1987.
Volcker was born in Cape May, New Jersey, in 1927. He graduated from Princeton University with a bachelor’s degree and Harvard University Graduate School of Public Administration with a master’s degree. Throughout his career, he received honorary degrees from Adelphi University, the University of New Hampshire, and Dartmouth College, among others.
Volcker worked as an economist with the Federal Reserve from 1952 to 1957, when he departed to work for Chase Manhattan Bank. He was named director of the Treasury Department’s Office of Financial Analysis in 1962. Volcker was promoted to deputy undersecretary for monetary matters the following year. He left the government in 1965 to return to Chase Manhattan Bank as a vice president. He stayed with the corporation until 1969, when he returned to the Treasury as an undersecretary of the Treasury for monetary affairs. Volcker made major improvements to the international monetary system during his five years as Fed Chairman. He left the Treasury in 1974 to become a visiting fellow at Princeton.
Volcker was appointed president of the Federal Reserve Bank of New York in August 1975. He became a proponent of monetary restriction during his time there, when he was actively involved in monetary policy decision-making procedures.
Following a rapid spike in inflation between 1978 and 1979, President Jimmy Carter shifted his economic policy team and appointed Volcker to the Board of Governors.
During his first term, Volcker concentrated on lowering inflation and assuring the public that rising interest rates were due to market forces rather than Board decisions. Shortly after taking office, he increased the discount rate by 0.5 percent. Volcker also kept a close eye on the debt issue in developing countries and backed the increase of the IMF’s reserve fund.
Volcker prioritized raising the money supply without creating inflation during his second term. He also paid more attention to the Board of Governors’ structural restructuring, which included safeguarding the Federal Reserve’s regulatory authority and limiting risky commercial bank activity. Commercial banks should not be allowed to underwrite corporate securities or participate in real estate development, according to Volcker.
Volcker served as chair of the National Commission on Public Service after leaving the Board of Governors. He joined James D. Wolfensohn, an international financial services corporation, as chair and minority owner in 1988. Volcker served as chairman of the International Accounting Standards Board of Trustees from 2000 to 2005.
From 2009 to 2011, Volcker was the chair of President Obama’s Economic Recovery Advisory Board. Volcker’s introduction of the “Volcker Rule” to the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act was a crucial contribution to the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act. Banking institutions are prohibited from engaging in proprietary trading in securities, derivatives, or certain other financial instruments, as well as investing in, sponsoring, or having certain contacts with hedge funds or private equity funds, according to the clause.
Volcker was a member of the Japan Society, the Institute of International Economics, and the American Assembly, among other public policy organizations.
What happens if inflation rises too quickly?
If inflation continues to rise over an extended period of time, economists refer to this as hyperinflation. Expectations that prices will continue to rise fuel inflation, which lowers the real worth of each dollar in your wallet.
Spiraling prices can lead to a currency’s value collapsing in the most extreme instances imagine Zimbabwe in the late 2000s. People will want to spend any money they have as soon as possible, fearing that prices may rise, even if only temporarily.
Although the United States is far from this situation, central banks such as the Federal Reserve want to prevent it at all costs, so they normally intervene to attempt to curb inflation before it spirals out of control.
The issue is that the primary means of doing so is by rising interest rates, which slows the economy. If the Fed is compelled to raise interest rates too quickly, it might trigger a recession and increase unemployment, as happened in the United States in the early 1980s, when inflation was at its peak. Then-Fed head Paul Volcker was successful in bringing inflation down from a high of over 14% in 1980, but at the expense of double-digit unemployment rates.
Americans aren’t experiencing inflation anywhere near that level yet, but Jerome Powell, the Fed’s current chairman, is almost likely thinking about how to keep the country from getting there.
The Conversation has given permission to reprint this article under a Creative Commons license. Read the full article here.
Photo credit for the banner image:
Prices for used cars and trucks are up 31% year over year. David Zalubowski/AP Photo