Too much emphasis is placed on the current rate of inflation rather than its future consequences. The two largest dangers of rising inflation, we believe, are constraints on business profitability and the possibility of higher interest rates, neither of which are currently flashing warning flags.
Is there a chance of inflation?
Inflation has returned. Despite the fact that rates are likely to fall in 2022, Martin Paick and Juraj Falath note that there is a lot of uncertainty, and the Fed needs to act now to prevent having to reverse course later.
Despite the fact that some price rises were anticipated, US inflation rates have routinely exceeded economists’ estimates. Seven of the last ten CPI inflation numbers shocked economists to the upside, but none to the downside. New COVID mutations that are more transmissible, slower vaccine rollouts (creating supply bottlenecks in emerging nations), decreased vaccine efficacy, supply chain disruptions, climatic hazards, and rising property and energy prices are all potential risks.
Inflationary pressures that persist are unfavorable for debtors. A little degree of inflation above target could help countries restructure their debt and wipe out some of the record government debt burden. If inflation spirals out of control and central banks are forced to slam on the brakes by hiking interest rates sharply, those record debt levels would hurt even more. Furthermore, stifling economic activity too severely risks triggering a new recession.
Inflation soared because of COVID
To determine if we should be concerned about inflation, we must first examine the current sources of inflationary pressures. The only source of inflation that should prompt a contractionary macroeconomic policy response (either monetary by raising interest rates or fiscal by reducing budget deficits) is inflation caused by the labor market. There is a risk of “overheating” when workers have enough bargaining strength to win a pay raise that exceeds the economy’s long-term potential. Only in this case, where wage growth exceeds productivity growth, should macroeconomic policy be intervened. Other supply-side causes of inflation, such as commodity prices, are very volatile and largely determined by global markets. These inflationary pressures are unlikely to be permanent because they are not the product of overheating.
Energy costs and variables related with the reopening of the US economy were the key drivers of inflation at the start of 2021. Both of these things are usually just transient. However, since the second quarter of 2021, CPI inflation has been increasingly driven by increases in the pricing of core items that are unrelated to the reopening (Figure 1, green columns). This could point to the fact that inflation is becoming more persistent.
Figure 1 shows the impact of reopening and other factors on CPI inflation in the United States (month-on-month in per cent)
Source: Bloomberg, based on my own calculations. Food away from home, used automobiles and trucks, car and truck rental, housing away from home, motor vehicle insurance, and airline cost are all included in the CPI’s reopening component. The rest of the COICOP categories are included in the non-reopening component.
The globe is currently experiencing the worst energy crisis in decades. Gas and power rates have reached all-time highs. This can be considered as part of a compensation for the extreme price drops in 2020, which drove several factories to shut down. The removal of limits increased commodity demand, resulting in higher energy costs. Emission allowances have become more expensive, resulting in a type of green tax. The need for natural gas and oil is increasing as winter approaches. Because supplies are limited, the severity of the crisis will be determined by how cold it becomes.
What we call to as reopening factors have been the second major contributor to headline inflation. Demand has rebounded in contact-sensitive sectors such as vehicle sales, transportation, recreation and culture, holidays, and restaurants as social alienation has reduced. As a result of the battle to supply this pent-up demand and process stockpiled orders, prices began to rise. Reopening triggered inflationary pressures on both the supply and demand sides. Production bottlenecks were caused by a paucity of crucial components in the automobile sector, as well as expensive energy. When demand for cars was low, some chipmakers redirected deliveries to mobile operators. The scarcity of chips available to carmakers pushed vehicle costs up as it started to recover.
Labour markets are much tighter than employment data suggests
We need to look at labor market developments to assess the inflation picture. In general, the unemployment rate decreases as the economy recovers. Workers get more bargaining power as labor demand rises, allowing them to negotiate higher compensation. Their achievement will have an impact on inflation, as higher labor expenses may be passed on to consumers in the form of higher product prices. This can result in a downward price-wage spiral.
More persons chose to remain in retirement, either to health issues or a re-evaluation of life goals.
The labor market in the United States is much tighter than it appears, despite the fact that there are 4.7 million fewer employed employees than before the pandemic. With unemployment at 4.2 percent, there is still a long way to go before reaching the pre-pandemic low of 3.5 percent. The majority of the tightness stems from a drop in participation. Some people were able to retire early or take a temporary hiatus from work because to generous fiscal handouts such as childcare benefits or direct checks to American families. However, a large portion of the reduction in participation was attributable to fewer previously retired people returning to work. More of those people choose to remain in retirement, owing to health issues or a re-evaluation of their life goals. Jobs are plentiful, with 10.4 million opportunities in September. When combined with the historically high percentage of Americans quitting their employment voluntarily, this indicates high job market confidence and, as a result, tight labor markets. Wage inflation is likely to persist as businesses compete for workers who have a choice of occupations.
In the long run, the highest rate of wage increase that can be sustained is equal to the central bank’s inflation target (2% in the US) plus possible productivity growth. Given that this rate in the United States is projected to be about 1.5 percent, nominal wages can rise by about 3.5 percent year over year without worrying about inflation exceeding the objective. In October, average hourly earnings in the United States increased by 4.9 percent year over year, indicating that workers are increasingly able to demand better pay. This is different from the past, when wages did not begin to rise until the recovery was nearing its end. Even more strangely, low-wage workers have benefited the most from the recovery. While this is wonderful news, it could also mean slightly higher inflation in the long run because low-wage employees spend disproportionately on essential commodities.
Markets still on team transitory with more upside risks
Prices are influenced by what consumers and businesses expect, as well as the current situation of the economy. People will demand greater wages in the negotiation process if they predict more inflation. Firms may then try to pass the cost on to customers in the form of higher prices. This is less of an issue for them during times of high demand.
Inflation is expected to rise in the short future, according to financial markets. Long-term expectations in the United States are beginning to de-anchor, with 5y5y forward swaps topping 2.5 percent (Figure 2). The de-anchoring of expectations could have serious effects if they remain high or rise much higher.
Median inflation estimates can be of limited help when the severity of the problem and the desired policy response are dependent on inflation drivers and tail risks. A closer examination of expectations reveals that there is still a modest (but not insignificant) probability that average inflation will exceed 4% during the next five years (Figure 3, red area). The markets, on the other hand, continue to assume that inflation of 2.5-4 percent on average over the next five years is the most likely scenario (Figure 3, dark yellow area). This could lead the Fed to slam on the brakes in the future in order to keep inflation under control. The flattening of the yield curve further supports the idea that the Fed committed a policy blunder by adopting such a lax policy. Although markets anticipate some interest rate hikes in the near future, a rate reversal signals that the transition to neutral rates will be bumpy.
Figure 3: Future inflation probabilities determined from inflation alternatives (average expected inflation for the next 5 years)
The Fed is on the brink of a policy mistake
The inflation rise is consistent with most economic theories, given the unique character of the crisis and the fact that inflationary pressures are mostly originating from the supply side. The key question currently facing central banks is whether increased inflation will become permanent. If employees continue to earn larger wages, this could happen. The de-anchoring of inflation expectations from the central bank aim is another reason why inflation could become entrenched. According to popular belief, if inflation is driven by temporary circumstances, it cannot endure for a long time. These two mechanisms, on the other hand, call this premise into question. Neither may be easily remedied, and each may necessitate a policy shift by central banks. Right now, the greatest danger is not hyperinflation, but long-term high inflation.
Huge quantities of fiscal stimulus, particularly in the form of generous unemployment benefits and checks to low- and middle-income families, have sown the seeds of inflation. Savings have been boosted even more by historic returns in resurgent stock markets, which have benefited Americans in particular. In the near future, this, together with pent-up demand, is anticipated to exert upward pressure on pricing.
Should we thus dismiss Joe Biden’s Build Back Better plan as adding more fuel to the inflation fire? Certainly not. For the first time, a significant portion of the bill is aimed at increasing labor market participation by providing childcare for working families. One of the major concerns about current inflation might be resolved by making it simpler for people to return to work, thereby alleviating labor shortages.
The true danger of escalating inflation outweighs the fact that the US is still not at full employment.
The central bank’s alternatives are restricted. To speed up deliveries, the Fed can’t produce missing semiconductors, mine more oil, or build faster ships. It’s possible that reducing pent-up demand is the way to proceed. However, because the US is still far from full employment, the Fed’s self-imposed benchmark for reducing stimulus, the dual mission complicates things. Furthermore, following the most recent strategy review, full employment should be inclusive as well. This criterion will not be met anytime soon, as Hispanic and Black minorities have been disproportionately affected by the COVID recession.
The real risk of inflation becoming entrenched, in our opinion, outweighs the fact that the United States is still far from full employment. This is a once-in-a-lifetime chance for fiscal and monetary policy to come together. While the monetary side may stop pumping cash into the system, so dampening demand, the fiscal side could much more effectively encourage workforce participation, assisting the Fed in meeting its full employment aim.
In the end, the credibility of the Fed will be critical. Open dialogue and self-reflection are the first steps. The Fed should be candid about why it miscalculated inflation persistence and adjust its assessment of future risks. The recent decision to accelerate the withdrawal of stimulus is a significant step toward recovering credibility and trust in the Fed’s ability to control inflation. The Fed has removed the word “transitory” from its vocabulary, admitting inflation as the number one enemy and signaling speedier rate hikes as an early sign of self-reflection. However, it should do more now in order to avoid having to slam on the brakes later.
Inflation is a sort of risk.
Inflation risk refers to when the price of products and services rises faster than expected, or when the same amount of money has less purchasing power. Purchasing Power Risk is another name for inflation risk.
Is there a market danger from inflation?
We discussed inflation as the largest risk to markets for the rest of 2021 in our recent podcast with BetaShares’ Chief Economist, David Bassanese (listen to the whole episode here). The causes of the recent surge in inflation are discussed, as well as whether the higher inflation rate is temporary or permanent. As David explains, he feels that, while inflation is the most significant risk to markets, it will eventually prove ephemeral.
What effect does inflation have on risk?
Most individuals are aware that inflation raises the cost of their food and depreciates the worth of their money. In reality, inflation impacts every aspect of the economy, and it can eat into your investment returns over time.
What is inflation?
Inflation is the gradual increase in the average cost of goods and services. The Bureau of Labor Statistics, which compiles data to construct the Consumer Price Index, measures it (CPI). The CPI measures the general rise in the price of consumer goods and services by tracking the cost of products such as fuel, food, clothing, and automobiles over time.
The cost of living, as measured by the CPI, increased by 7% in 2021.
1 This translates to a 7% year-over-year increase in prices. This means that a car that costs $20,000 in 2020 will cost $21,400 in 2021.
Inflation is heavily influenced by supply and demand. When demand for a good or service increases, and supply for that same good or service decreases, prices tend to rise. Many factors influence supply and demand on a national and worldwide level, including the cost of commodities and labor, income and goods taxes, and loan availability.
According to Rob Haworth, investment strategy director at U.S. Bank, “we’re currently seeing challenges in the supply chain of various items as a result of pandemic-related economic shutdowns.” This has resulted in pricing imbalances and increased prices. For example, due to a lack of microchips, the supply of new cars has decreased dramatically during the last year. As a result, demand for old cars is increasing. Both new and used car prices have risen as a result of these reasons.
Read a more in-depth study of the present economic environment’s impact on inflation from U.S. Bank investment strategists.
Indicators of rising inflation
There are three factors that can cause inflation, which is commonly referred to as reflation.
- Monetary policies of the Federal Reserve (Fed), including interest rates. The Fed has pledged to maintain interest rates low for the time being. This may encourage low-cost borrowing, resulting in increased economic activity and demand for goods and services.
- Oil prices, in particular, have been rising. Oil demand is intimately linked to economic activity because it is required for the production and transportation of goods. Oil prices have climbed in recent months, owing to increased economic activity and demand, as well as tighter supply. Future oil price rises are anticipated to be moderated as producer supply recovers to meet expanding demand.
- Reduced reliance on imported goods and services is known as regionalization. The pursuit of the lowest-cost manufacturer has been the driving force behind the outsourcing of manufacturing during the last decade. As companies return to the United States, the cost of manufacturing, including commodities and labor, is expected to rise, resulting in inflation.
Future results will be influenced by the economic recovery and rising inflation across asset classes. Investors should think about how it might affect their investment strategies, says Haworth.
How can inflation affect investments?
When inflation rises, assets with fixed, long-term cash flows perform poorly because the purchasing power of those future cash flows decreases over time. Commodities and assets with changeable cash flows, such as property rental income, on the other hand, tend to fare better as inflation rises.
Even if you put your money in a savings account with a low interest rate, inflation can eat away at your savings.
In theory, your earnings should stay up with inflation while you’re working. Inflation reduces your purchasing power when you’re living off your savings, such as in retirement. In order to ensure that you have enough assets to last throughout your retirement years, you must factor inflation into your retirement savings.
Fixed income instruments, such as bonds, treasuries, and CDs, are typically purchased by investors who want a steady stream of income in the form of interest payments. However, because most fixed income assets have the same interest rate until maturity, the buying power of interest payments decreases as inflation rises. As a result, as inflation rises, bond prices tend to fall.
The fact that most bonds pay fixed interest, or coupon payments, is one explanation. Inflation reduces the present value of a bond’s future fixed cash payments by eroding the buying power of its future (fixed) coupon income. Accelerating inflation is considerably more damaging to longer-term bonds, due to the cumulative effect of decreasing buying power for future cash flows.
Riskier high yield bonds typically provide higher incomes, and thus have a larger cushion than their investment grade counterparts when inflation rises, says Haworth.
Stocks have outperformed inflation over the previous 30 years, according to a study conducted by the US Bank Asset Management Group.
2 Revenues and earnings should, in theory, increase at the same rate as inflation. This means your stock’s price should rise in lockstep with consumer and producer goods prices.
In the past 30 years, when inflation has accelerated, U.S. stocks have tended to climb in price, though the association has not been very strong.
Larger corporations have a stronger association with inflation than mid-sized corporations, while mid-sized corporations have a stronger relationship with inflation than smaller corporations. When inflation rose, foreign stocks in developed nations tended to fall in value, while developing market stocks had an even larger negative link.
In somewhat rising inflation conditions, larger U.S. corporate equities may bring some benefit, says Haworth. However, in more robust inflation settings, they are not the most successful investment tool.
According to a study conducted by the US Bank Asset Management Group, real assets such as commodities and real estate have a positive link with inflation.
Commodities have shown to be a dependable approach to hedge against rising inflation in the past. Inflation is calculated by following the prices of goods and services that frequently contain commodities, as well as products that are closely tied to commodities. Oil and other energy-related commodities have a particularly strong link to inflation (see above). When inflation accelerates, industrial and precious metals prices tend to rise as well.
Commodities, on the other hand, have significant disadvantages, argues Haworth. They are more volatile than other asset types, provide no income, and have historically underperformed stocks and bonds over longer periods of time.
As it comes to real estate, when the price of products and services rises, property owners can typically increase rent payments, which can lead to increased profits and investor payouts.
What makes inflation a financial concern?
Inflationary pressures produce price increases, which reduces the real return on a particular investment. Inflation risk has an impact on portfolio planning, particularly when it comes to retirement spending. When living off of investments, the higher the inflation rate, the less purchasing power a retiree will have.