His remark has a lot of people scratching their heads. While the “Great Recession” was frightening, it wasn’t a depression because of Bernanke’s robust policy reaction.
Was the Great Recession as bad as the Depression?
- The Great Recession was a period of economic slump that lasted from 2007 to 2009, following the bursting of the housing bubble in the United States and the worldwide financial crisis.
- The Great Recession was the worst economic downturn in the United States since the 1930s’ Great Depression.
- Federal authorities unleashed unprecedented fiscal, monetary, and regulatory policy in reaction to the Great Recession, which some, but not all, credit with the ensuing recovery.
What is the relationship between the Great Recession and the Great Depression?
The price level decreased by 22% and real GDP plummeted by 31% during the Great Depression, which lasted from 1929 to 1933. The price level climbed slowly during the 2008-2009 recession, and real GDP fell by less than 4%. For a variety of factors, the 2008-2009 recession was substantially milder than the Great Depression:
- Bank failures, a 25% reduction in the quantity of money, and Fed inaction culminated in a collapse of aggregate demand during the Great Depression. The sluggish adjustment of money pay rates and the price level resulted in massive drops in real GDP and employment.
- During the 2008 financial crisis, the Federal Reserve bailed out struggling financial institutions and quadrupled the monetary base, causing the money supply to rise. The expanding supply of money, when combined with greater government spending, restricted the fall in aggregate demand, resulting in lower decreases in employment and real GDP. (21)
The 20082009 Recession
Real GDP peaked at $15 trillion in 2008, with a price level of 99. Real GDP had declined to $14.3 trillion in the second quarter of 2009, while the price level had climbed to 100. In 2009, a recessionary void formed. The financial crisis, which began in 2007 and worsened in 2008, reduced the supply of loanable funds, resulting in a drop in investment. Construction investment, in particular, has plummeted. As a result of the worldwide economic downturn, demand for U.S. exports fell, and this component of aggregate demand fell as well. A huge injection of spending by the US government helped to soften the decline in aggregate demand, but it did not stop it from falling.
The supply of aggregates has also dropped. A decline in aggregate supply was caused by two causes in 2007: a spike in oil costs and a rise in the money wage rate. (21)
What are the three most significant distinctions between the Great Depression and the Great Recession?
Although some superficial parallels have been drawn between the Great Recession and the Great Depression, there are significant differences between the two catastrophes. Actually, if the original shocks were the same magnitude in both circumstances, the recovery from the most recent one would be faster. In March 2009, economists were of the opinion that a slump was unlikely to materialize. On March 25, 2009, UCLA Anderson Forecast director Edward Leamer stated that no big predictions of a second Great Depression had been made at the time:
“We’ve scared people enough that they believe there’s a good chance of another Great Depression. That does not appear to be the case. Nothing resembling a Great Depression is being predicted by any reliable forecaster.”
The stock market had not fallen as much as it had in 1932 or 1982, the 10-year price-to-earnings ratio of stocks had not been as low as it had been in the 1930s or 1980s, and inflation-adjusted U.S. housing prices in March 2009 were higher than any time since 1890 (including the housing booms) (where as in 2008 and 2009 the Fed “has taken an ultraloose credit stance”).
Furthermore, the unemployment rate in 2008 and early 2009, as well as the rate at which it grew, was comparable to other post-World War II recessions, and was dwarfed by the Great Depression’s 25 percent unemployment rate peak. In a 2012 piece, syndicated columnist and former Assistant Secretary of the Treasury Paul Craig Roberts argued that if all discouraged employees were included in U.S. unemployment figures, the actual unemployment rate would be 22%, equal to the Great Depression.
Was the financial crisis of 2008 as bad as the Great Depression?
We were hit by the worst financial shock in history ten years ago, far worse than the Great Depression. Indeed, during the 1930s, “only” a third of U.S. banks failed, although former Federal Reserve chairman Ben S. Bernanke declared bankruptcy in 2008.
What are the distinctions between a recession and a depression?
A recession is a natural element of the business cycle that occurs when the economy declines for two consecutive quarters. A depression, on the other hand, is a prolonged decline in economic activity that lasts years rather than months.
Will there be another Great Depression?
The 12-year Great Depression in America began with a crash 72 years ago. On October 24, 1929, the stock market bottomed out, indicating the start of the country’s longest and severe economic downturn. Everyone wants to know if a crash may happen again given that we are in an economic downturn.
Many industries in Washington state were shaken on October 24, dubbed “Black Thursday.” Although the disaster did not have the same impact on Washington as it did on other states, the consequences of the downturn and various government actions hurt certain sectors substantially.
After the 1929 Federal Reserve-industry catastrophe, unemployment in the United States skyrocketed. In the 1930s, the government’s ballooning taxes and regulations left the country entrenched in economic hardship.
Wheat prices in Washington had decreased to.38 cents per bushel by 1932, from $1.83 in the early 1920s. By 1935, the value of Washington farmland and buildings had decreased from $920 million to $551 million, despite a 300 percent increase in county debt statewide and a 36 percent drop in payrolls.
The state’s lumber industry was particularly heavily damaged by the economic downturn. Between 1929 and 1932, per capita lumber consumption in the United States fell by two-thirds. Washington’s annual lumber production fell from 7.3 billion feet to 2.2 billion feet during the same time period. By the end of 1931, at least half of mill workers had lost their jobs.
The Roosevelt administration’s measures accomplished little to boost the lumber business. Individual industries were subjected to tight production limitations and price controls under the National Industrial Recovery Act (NIRA) of 1933. Before the Act was declared unlawful in 1935, it barred the construction of new sawmills and limited individual operators to a set quota of production. More sawmills were erected as a result of failed federal monitoring, and total production per firm declined.
One part of the NIRA significantly increased big labor’s organizing strength and required managers to bargain with unions. Historians now consider the implementation of New Deal measures in the Pacific Northwest as a direct result of the solidification of Washington’s labor movement.
Is it possible for another Great Depression to occur? Perhaps, but it would require a recurrence of the bipartisan and disastrously dumb policies of the 1920s and 1930s.
Economists now know, for the most part, that the stock market did not trigger the 1929 crisis. It was a symptom of the country’s money supply’s extraordinarily unpredictable changes. The Federal Reserve System was the main culprit, having sparked a boom in the early 1920s with ultra-low interest rates and easy money. By 1929, the central bank had raised rates so high that the boom had been choked off, and the money supply had been reduced by one-third between 1929 and 1933.
A recession was turned into a Great Depression by Congress in 1930. It slashed tariffs to the point where imports and exports were effectively shut down. In 1932, it quadrupled income tax rates. Franklin D. Roosevelt, who ran on a platform of less government, gave America far more than he promised. His “New Deal” increased taxes (he once proposed a tax rate of 99.5 percent on incomes above $100,000), penalized investment, and suffocated business with regulations and red tape.
Washington, like all states, is subject to the whims of federal policymakers. And the recipe for economic depression remains the same: suffocating market freedom, crushing incentives with high tax rates, and overwhelming firms with suffocating regulations.
The 1929 stock market crash and the accompanying Great Depression are worth remembering not just because they caused so much suffering in Washington and abroad, but also because, as philosopher George Santayana warned, “Those who cannot recall history are destined to repeat it.”
Lawrence W. Reed is the director of Michigan’s Mackinac Center for Public Policy and an adjunct scholar at Seattle’s Washington Policy Center. Jason Smosna, a WPC researcher, contributed to this commentary.
What triggered the recession in 2001?
(March 2001November 2001) The 9/11 Recession Causes and reasons: The dotcom bubble burst, the 9/11 attacks, and a series of accounting scandals at major U.S. firms all contributed to the economy’s relatively slight downturn. Within a few months, GDP had recovered to its previous level.
Is the Great Depression considered an epoch?
The Great Depression, which lasted from 1929 to 1939, was the worst economic downturn in the history of the industrialized world. It all started after the October 1929 stock market crash, which plunged Wall Street into a frenzy and wiped out millions of investors.
What triggered the Great Depression and the subsequent Great Recession?
The Great Recession wreaked havoc on both local and national labor markets. Many of the red signs blamed for the crisis are still present ten years later, according to Berkeley researchers: banks making subprime loans and trading dangerous assets.
Was it possible to avoid the Great Recession?
The catastrophe could have been avoided if two things had happened. The first step would have been to regulate mortgage brokers who made the problematic loans, as well as hedge funds that used excessive leverage. The second would have been seen as a credibility issue early on. The government’s sole option was to buy problematic debts.