Can Inflation Be Good For The Economy?

Inflation is and has been a contentious topic in economics. Even the term “inflation” has diverse connotations depending on the situation. Many economists, businesspeople, and politicians believe that mild inflation is necessary to stimulate consumer spending, presuming that higher levels of expenditure are necessary for economic progress.

How Can Inflation Be Good For The Economy?

The Federal Reserve usually sets an annual rate of inflation for the United States, believing that a gradually rising price level makes businesses successful and stops customers from waiting for lower costs before buying. In fact, some people argue that the primary purpose of inflation is to avert deflation.

Others, on the other hand, feel that inflation is little, if not a net negative on the economy. Rising costs make saving more difficult, forcing people to pursue riskier investing techniques in order to grow or keep their wealth. Some argue that inflation enriches some businesses or individuals while hurting the majority.

The Federal Reserve aims for 2% annual inflation, thinking that gradual price rises help businesses stay profitable.

Understanding Inflation

The term “inflation” is frequently used to characterize the economic impact of rising oil or food prices. If the price of oil rises from $75 to $100 per barrel, for example, input prices for firms would rise, as will transportation expenses for everyone. As a result, many other prices may rise as well.

Most economists, however, believe that the actual meaning of inflation is slightly different. Inflation is a result of the supply and demand for money, which means that generating more dollars reduces the value of each dollar, causing the overall price level to rise.

Key Takeaways

Inflation, according to economists, occurs when the supply of money exceeds the demand for it.
When inflation helps to raise consumer demand and consumption, which drives economic growth, it is considered as a positive.
Some people believe inflation is necessary to prevent deflation, while others say it is a drag on the economy.
Some inflation, according to John Maynard Keynes, helps to avoid the Paradox of Thrift, or postponed consumption.

When Inflation Is Good

When the economy isn’t operating at full capacity, which means there’s unsold labor or resources, inflation can theoretically assist boost output. More money means higher spending, which corresponds to more aggregated demand. As a result of increased demand, more production is required to supply that need.

To avoid the Paradox of Thrift, British economist John Maynard Keynes argued that some inflation was required. According to this theory, if consumer prices are allowed to decline steadily as a result of the country’s increased productivity, consumers learn to postpone purchases in order to get a better deal. This paradox has the net effect of lowering aggregate demand, resulting in lower production, layoffs, and a faltering economy.

Inflation also helps borrowers by allowing them to repay their loans with less valuable money than they borrowed. This fosters borrowing and lending, which boosts expenditure across the board. The fact that the United States is the world’s greatest debtor, and inflation serves to ease the shock of its vast debt, is perhaps most crucial to the Federal Reserve.

Economists used to believe that inflation and unemployment had an inverse connection, and that rising unemployment could be combated by increasing inflation. The renowned Phillips curve defined this relationship. When the United States faced stagflation in the 1970s, the Phillips curve was severely discredited.

Which kind of inflation are beneficial to the economy?

The rate of change in the prices of anything from a bar of Ivory soap to the cost of an eye exam is characterized as inflation.

The consumer price index is the most often used measure of inflation in the United States. Simply explained, the index measures the average cost of a basket of products and services that most households buy. It’s frequently used to determine wage rises or adjust retiree benefits. The inflation rate is the difference between one year and the next.

The current percentage change in the index is roughly 2%. However, this is an average of a number of different categories. Tobacco prices, for example, have increased by 4.6 percent in the last year, but garment prices have decreased by 3%. Obviously, the actual cost of living will differ from person to person based on how they spend their money.

The latest Department of Labor data indicated that a carefully monitored measure of inflation was lower than predicted in May, raising concerns that the economy is developing too slowly.

Inflation at a reasonable level is often regarded as a sign of a thriving economy, because as the economy rises, so does demand for goods. As suppliers try to produce more of the item that customers and businesses desire to buy, prices rise a little. Workers profit because economic expansion leads to an increase in labor demand, which leads to wage increases.

Finally, these higher-paid people go out and buy more things, and thus the cycle continues “The “virtuous” cycle is still going strong. Inflation isn’t the cause of all of this; it’s just a symptom of a healthy, rising economy.

When inflation is too low or too high a recession can occur “In its stead, a “vicious” cycle can emerge.

Is inflation beneficial or harmful to the economy?

Inflation is defined as a steady increase in overall price levels. Inflation that is moderate is linked to economic growth, whereas high inflation can indicate an overheated economy. Businesses and consumers spend more money on goods and services as the economy grows.

Why is inflation detrimental to the economy?

Inflation, or the gradual increase in the price of goods and services over time, has a variety of positive and negative consequences.
Inflation reduces purchasing power, or the amount of something that can be bought with money.
Because inflation reduces the purchasing power of currency, customers are encouraged to spend and store up on products that depreciate more slowly.

What advantages does inflation provide?

1. Deflation (price declines negative inflation) is extremely dangerous. People are hesitant to spend money while prices are falling because they believe items will be cheaper in the future; as a result, they continue to postpone purchases. Furthermore, deflation raises the real worth of debt and lowers the disposable income of people who are trying to pay off debt. When consumers take on debt, such as a mortgage, they typically expect a 2% inflation rate to help erode the debt’s value over time. If the 2% inflation rate does not materialize, their debt burden will be higher than anticipated. Deflationary periods wreaked havoc on the UK in the 1920s, Japan in the 1990s and 2000s, and the Eurozone in the 2010s.

2. Wage adjustments are possible due to moderate inflation. A moderate pace of inflation, it is thought, makes relative salary adjustments easier. It may be difficult, for example, to reduce nominal wages (workers resent and resist a nominal wage cut). However, if average wages are growing due to modest inflation, it is simpler to raise the pay of productive workers; unproductive people’ earnings can be frozen, effectively resulting in a real wage reduction. If there was no inflation, there would be greater real wage unemployment, as businesses would be unable to decrease pay to recruit workers.

3. Inflation allows comparable pricing to be adjusted. Moderate inflation, like the previous argument, makes it easier to alter relative pricing. This is especially significant in the case of a single currency, such as the Eurozone. Countries in southern Europe, such as Italy, Spain, and Greece, have become uncompetitive, resulting in a high current account deficit. Because Spain and Greece are unable to weaken their currencies in the Single Currency, they must reduce comparable prices in order to recover competitiveness. Because of Europe’s low inflation, they are forced to slash prices and wages, resulting in decreased growth (due to the effects of deflation). It would be easier for southern Europe to adjust and restore competitiveness without succumbing to deflation if the Eurozone had modest inflation.

4. Inflation can help the economy grow. The economy may be locked in a recession during periods of exceptionally low inflation. Targeting a higher rate of inflation may theoretically improve economic growth. This viewpoint is divisive. Some economists oppose aiming for a higher inflation rate. Some, on the other hand, would aim for more inflation if the economy remained in a prolonged slump. See also: Inflation rate that is optimal.

For example, in 2013-14, the Eurozone experienced a relatively low inflation rate, which was accompanied by very slow economic development and high unemployment. We may have witnessed a rise in Eurozone GDP if the ECB had been willing to aim higher inflation.

The Phillips Curve argues that inflation and unemployment are mutually exclusive. Higher inflation reduces unemployment (at least in the short term), but the significance of this trade-off is debatable.

5. Deflation is preferable to inflation. Economists joke that the only thing worse than inflation is deflation. A drop in prices can increase actual debt burdens while also discouraging spending and investment. The Great Depression of the 1930s was exacerbated by deflation.

Disadvantages of inflation

When the inflation rate exceeds 2%, it is usually considered a problem. The more inflation there is, the more serious the matter becomes. Hyperinflation can wipe out people’s savings and produce considerable instability in severe cases, such as in Germany in the 1920s, Hungary in the 1940s, and Zimbabwe in the 2000s. This type of hyperinflation, on the other hand, is uncommon in today’s economy. Inflation is usually accompanied by increased interest rates, so savers don’t lose their money. Inflation, on the other hand, can still be an issue.

Inflationary expansion is often unsustainable, resulting in harmful boom-bust economic cycles. For example, in the late 1980s, the United Kingdom experienced substantial inflation, but this economic boom was unsustainable, and attempts by the government to curb inflation resulted in the recession of 1990-92.
Inflation tends to inhibit long-term economic growth and investment. This is due to the increased likelihood of uncertainty and misunderstanding during periods of high inflation. Low inflation is said to promote better stability and encourage businesses to invest and take risks.
Inflation can make a business unprofitable. A significantly greater rate of inflation in Italy, for example, can render Italian exports uncompetitive, resulting in a lower AD, a current account deficit, and slower economic growth. This is especially crucial for Euro-zone countries, as they are unable to devalue in order to regain competitiveness.
Reduce the worth of your savings. Money loses its worth as a result of inflation. If inflation is higher than interest rates, savers will be worse off. Inflationary pressures can cause income redistribution in society. The elderly are frequently the ones that suffer the most from inflation. This is especially true when inflation is strong and interest rates are low.
Menu costs – during periods of strong inflation, the cost of revising price lists increases. With modern technologies, this isn’t as important.
Real wages are falling. In some cases, significant inflation might result in a decrease in real earnings. Real incomes decline when inflation is higher than nominal salaries. During the Great Recession of 2008-16, this was a concern, as prices rose faster than incomes.

Inflation (CPI) outpaced pay growth from 2008 to 2014, resulting in a drop in living standards, particularly for low-paid, zero-hour contract workers.

Is inflation associated with economic growth?

Inflation affects not only the amount of money invested in businesses, but also the efficiency with which productive components are used.

Inflation control has been the accepted credo of economic officials all across the world since 1984. Even a whisper of “the I-word” in the financial press by Alan Greenspan causes havoc in global stock markets. Monetary policymakers have thought that faster, more sustainable growth can only occur in an environment where the inflation monster is tamed, based in part on the macroeconomic misery experienced by OECD countries from 1973 to 1984, when inflation averaged 13%.

As the authors point out, there is little room for interpretation in their analysis. Inflation is not a neutral variable, and it does not favor rapid economic growth in any case. In the medium and long run, which is the time frame they look at, higher inflation never leads to higher levels of income. Even when other factors are considered, such as investment rate, population growth, schooling rates, and technological advancements, the negative correlation persists. Even after accounting for the effects of supply shocks that occurred during a portion of the study period, the authors find a strong negative association between inflation and growth.

Inflation affects not only the amount of money invested in businesses, but also the efficiency with which productive components are used. According to the authors, the benefits of lower inflation are significant, but they are also contingent on the rate of inflation. The greater the productive effects of a reduction, the lower the inflation rate. When the rate of inflation is 20%, for example, lowering it by one percentage point can boost growth by 0.5 percent. However, at a 5% inflation rate, output increases could be as high as 1%. As a result, conceding an additional point of inflation is more expensive for a low-inflation economy than it is for a higher-inflation country. The authors conclude that “efforts to keep inflation under control will sooner or later pay dividends in terms of better long-run performance and higher per capita income” based on their thorough analysis.

Is inflation beneficial or detrimental to stocks?

Consumers, stocks, and the economy may all suffer as a result of rising inflation. When inflation is high, value stocks perform better, and when inflation is low, growth stocks perform better. When inflation is high, stocks become more volatile.

What is the extent of inflation?

Year-on-year inflation rates have reached their greatest levels in over three decades as the global economy recovers from the COVID-19 epidemic. Is this higher inflation just a blip on the radar, or is it here to stay? Patricia Sanchez Juanino, Corrado Macchiarelli, and Barry Naisbitt explore US inflation possibilities for the next 18 months to answer these questions. They believe that inflation will peak at 5% in the coming months and then remain close to 4% in the near term: this may happen if, for example, inflation expectations continue to rise.

The 12-month CPI inflation rate in the United States reached its highest level since 1990 in October 2021, at 6.2 percent year-on-year. Pent-up demand and rising energy prices have been primary drivers of the increase, but supply chain constraints and spikes in other commodity prices have also played a role. A crucial policy question is whether the current rise in US inflation is only temporary, as it was in 2008, or if it signals the start of a longer era of inflation above the 2% objective, like it did in the 1970s and early 1980s.

The Federal Reserve has revised up its annual inflation predictions for both this year and next year as the year has progressed. The September median prediction for year-on-year PCE (household consumption) inflation in the fourth quarter increased to 4.2 percent this year and 2.2 percent next year. Both forecasts are higher than those issued in March: 2.4 percent in 2021 and 2% in 2022. Despite the fact that predictions have risen, Federal Reserve policymakers still expect inflation to decline considerably next year. The Federal Open Markets Committee (the group that decides on the right monetary policy stance) stated in November that it will cut its monthly purchases of Treasury securities and mortgage-backed securities, a policy known as tapering. However, it continued to emphasize that the spike in inflation, as reflected in its inflation estimates, was primarily transitory.

While we anticipate a reduction in inflationary pressure, we are concerned that the reduction will be insufficient. Annual US PCE inflation would grow from 1.2 percent in the fourth quarter of last year to 5.1 percent this year, then decline to 2.3 percent in the fourth quarter of 2022, according to the National Institute’s Autumn 2021 Global Economic Outlook. However, we believe that the risks are skewed to the upside, and that if they materialize, the Federal Reserve will be forced to tighten monetary policy sooner than it appears to be planning.

Inflation scenarios for 2022-23

To demonstrate the dangers, we employ Huw Dixon’s technique from Cardiff University, which allows us to make stylized assumptions about future monthly price fluctuations in order to generate various annual inflation routes over the next 18 months. Three scenarios are examined (rather than forecasts).

In the best-case scenario, monthly inflation reduces steadily until it reaches its average level for the five years prior to the pandemic in June of the following year, and then stays there. After that, the monthly price changes are converted into year-over-year inflation. On this measure, annual PCE inflation would decline to 2.1 percent in the fourth quarter of next year, roughly in line with the Federal Reserve’s consensus forecast.

We look at two other scenarios that are much less reassuring. We assume that the extent of monthly price increases decreases, but not as quickly or as far as before the pandemic, so that it reaches twice the pre-pandemic period average in June. In this instance, annual PCE inflation in the fourth quarter of next year would be 3.2 percent.

Finally, if monthly PCE inflation stays at its current level (0.3 percent) for the rest of the year, annual inflation in the fourth quarter of next year will be 3.9 percent. Figure 1 depicts the year-on-year inflation projected lines for several scenarios.

Figure 1: Year-over-year PCE inflation projections based on stylized monthly assumptions (percent)

The most intriguing aspect of these scenarios is that they all hint to annual inflation being near 5% in the next months. Figure 1 shows that, despite monthly inflation returning to the 2015-2019 average by next June, year-on-year inflation continues to rise over the following few months, reaching 5%, as lower monthly rises in 2020 are replaced by greater monthly increases this year. In the best-case scenario, annual inflation returns to 2% by the end of next year. If monthly inflation stays at 0.3 percent, year-over-year inflation will remain persistently close to 4%.

These are simply projections based on stylized assumptions, not forecasts or a deep examination of the underlying reasons influencing recent and future monthly price fluctuations. They are broadly consistent with the idea that annual inflation risks will remain strong through 2022, even if recent price hikes owing to supply chain disconnections fade away over time. If policies do not prevent inflation expectations from rising, the situation may worsen.

With its new mandate and a strong focus on maximum employment, the Federal Reserve expects a temporary (or, in today’s lingo, transitory) overshoot of inflation above its target, especially when it follows a long period of undershooting. If inflation expectations become skewed and wage-push inflation forces increase, a temporary overshoot could turn into a long-term one.

Higher inflation may be here to stay

According to our forecasts, the current rate of inflation could return to its target rate by the end of 2022. However, it appears that inflation will continue to exceed the objective for some years. If inflation reaches 5%, the Federal Reserve will need to significantly up its policy messaging, arguing that the spike is just temporary and convincing families, businesses, and financial markets that monthly inflation will soon revert to lower levels. If the current supply-chain disruption and global energy price increases end, its arguments will be strengthened.

The Federal Reserve has yet to clarify the timeframe of ending quantitative easing, reversing it, and subsequently raising policy interest rates. For example, an unexpected policy reversal to protect central bank credibility could cause a quick financial market slump and public sector balance sheet imbalances. How central banks respond to increasing inflation, through a mix of terminating quantitative easing and raising policy rates, will determine bond prices.

Inflation expectations are rising, and the Federal Reserve needs to create contingency plans for its actions if a 5% inflation rate appears to be embedded. If it lifts its inflation predictions again after its December meeting, as we expect, such contingency measures may be required sooner rather than later. Given the uncertainty about the duration of higher inflation, wages, and an employment rate that remains below pre-pandemic levels, we believe the Federal Reserve will be cautious in tightening policy, especially because it will have to choose between stabilizing below-target employment and stabilizing above-target inflation. Moving too far, too fast, risks squandering the best chance it has to avoid near-deflationary traps with interest rates at their lowest levels. They are likely to pay the price if it is a time of significantly above-target inflation.

“US inflation peaking soon?” in National Institute of Economic and Social Research (Box A), Global Economic Outlook, Series B., No. 4, Autumn, pp. 24-30, is the basis for this article. ‘Global Economic Outlook’, Series B, No. 4, Autumn, NIESR (2021).

Inflation benefits who?

Inflation Benefits Whom? While inflation provides minimal benefit to consumers, it can provide a boost to investors who hold assets in inflation-affected countries. If energy costs rise, for example, investors who own stock in energy businesses may see their stock values climb as well.

Advantages of Inflation

Deflation has the potential to be exceedingly harmful to the economy, as it might result in fewer consumer spending and growth. When prices are falling, for example, buyers are urged to put off purchasing in the hopes of a lower price in the future.
The real worth of debt is reduced when inflation is moderate. In a deflationary environment, the real value of debt rises, putting a strain on discretionary incomes.
Inflation rates that are moderate allow prices to adjust and goods to reach their true value.
Wage inflation at a moderate rate allows relative salaries to adjust. Wages are stuck in a downward spiral. Firms can effectively freeze pay raises for less productive workers with moderate inflation, effectively giving them a real pay cut.
Inflation rates that are moderate are indicative of a thriving economy. Inflation is frequently associated with economic growth.

Disadvantages of Inflation

Inflationary rates create uncertainty and confusion, which leads to less investment. It is said that countries with continuously high inflation have poorer investment and economic growth rates.
Increased inflation reduces international competitiveness, resulting in less exports and a worsening current account balance of payments. This is considerably more troublesome with a fixed exchange rate, such as the Euro, because countries do not have the option of devaluation.
Inflation can lower the real worth of investments, which can be especially detrimental to elderly persons who rely on their assets. It is, however, dependent on whether interest rates are higher than inflation.
The real value of government bonds will be reduced by inflation. To compensate, investors will demand higher bond rates, raising the cost of debt interest payments.
Hyperinflation has the potential to ruin an economy. If inflation becomes out of control, it can lead to a vicious cycle in which rising inflation leads to higher inflation expectations, which leads to further higher prices. Hyperinflation can wipe out middle-class savings and transfer wealth and income to people with debt, assets, and real estate.
Costs of lowering inflation. Governments/Central Banks must implement a deflationary fiscal/monetary policy to restore price stability. This, however, results in weaker aggregate demand and, in many cases, a recession. Reduced inflation comes at a cost: unemployment, at least in the short term.

When weighing the benefits and drawbacks of inflation, it’s vital to assess the sort of inflation at hand.

It’s possible that cost-push inflation is simply a blip on the radar (e.g. due to raising taxes). As a result, this is a one-time issue that isn’t as significant as deep-seated inflation (e.g. due to wage inflation and high inflation expectations)
Cost-push inflation, on the other hand, tends to lower living standards (short-run aggregate supply is shifted left). Cost-push inflation is also difficult to manage because a central bank cannot simultaneously cut inflation and boost economic growth.
It also depends on whether or not inflation is expected. Many people, particularly savers, are more likely to lose out if inflation is significantly greater than expected.