In actuality, the link between rising wages and inflation is more complicated: wages account for only a portion of the total cost of a product or service that customers pay for. A higher minimum wage can be countered by increased worker productivity or a reduction in a company’s workforce.
Increases in the minimum wage generate inflation?
As inflation reaches historic highs, lawmakers and analysts are debating the causes, which include pandemic-related shocks as well as government-imposed limitations and swings in consumer demand.
One New York Times writer remarked this week on Twitter that recent media headlines about inflation are “all hype.” “Policies like the $15 minimum wage” are blamed by “wealthy people.” Instead of being justified in her concern over fast rising prices for everyday items, she claims the recent coverage is “hysteria,” implying that inflation benefits lower-income people since “inflation helps borrowers, and that’s what the fuss is about…not milk prices.”
Minimum wage increases in the past have been shown to induce price increases, which disproportionately affect lower to middle-income persons who spend a bigger amount of their wages on inflation-affected commodities like groceries.
The snowball effect between minimum wage hikes, such as the $15 per hour now in place in numerous states and localities and proposed at the federal level this year, and price increases is documented in a report by Heritage Foundation fellow James Sherk. A $15 federal minimum wage, for example, represents a 107 percent increase over the current federal minimum pay of $7.25 per hour. Employers must adjust their business models to accommodate for the increased labor expenditure when governments enforce substantial minimum wage increases. In many circumstances, this necessitates firms raising consumer pricing to compensate for the higher cost of providing their goods or services. Sherk claims that this hurts minimum wage workers and lower-income consumers the most, because the costs of the products they buy have climbed as well, lowering their newly boosted salaries’ purchasing power.
According to one analysis of the existing minimum wage research, which mostly contains data on price effects from the United States, a 10% rise in the minimum wage raises prices by up to 0.3 percent.
According to one of the studies evaluated by the American Enterprise Institute, the same price boost might produce price rises of up to 2.7 percent in the southern United States, where living costs and earnings are much lower. Recent study also suggests that increased minimum wages have a greater inflationary impact on employers of minimum wage earners. A research by the Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago and the United States Department of Agriculture indicated that raising the minimum wage more than doubled the price increase effect in fast-food restaurants, and much higher in lower-wage areas.
In addition, a Stanford University economist looked at the impact of price hikes by income level and discovered that while “Minimum wage workers come from a wide range of socioeconomic backgrounds, and raising the minimum wage has the greatest impact on the poorest 20% of households.
Minimum wages encourage firms to raise prices to cover some of the additional pay bill, according to this analysis of previous findings. However, this comes at a price employers must be careful not to raise prices too much, as this will generate price-sensitive client demand. Employers are unable to raise prices if they believe that doing so will reduce demand and result in decreased revenues, which will not be sufficient to fund increases in employee wages. Employers are obliged to adjust costs in other ways if this happens, such as lowering other employee benefits, reducing scheduled hours, or laying off staff entirely.
Sherk claims that the price hike effect of rising minimum wages is combined with large job loss effects, implying that minimum wage people are more likely to lose their jobs or have their hours decreased as their cost of living rises. As a result, he believes that increasing minimum wages is an unproductive approach to provide benefits to low-wage workers due to inflationary and job-killing impacts.
Is pay growth linked to inflation?
According to a study released by the Labor Department on Friday, worker compensation climbed by almost 4% in a year, the quickest rate in two decades. As a result, there has been widespread concern that the United States is on the verge of a major crisis “The “wage-price spiral” occurs when higher wages push up prices, which in turn leads to demands for further higher wages, and so on. The wage-price spiral, on the other hand, is a misleading and outmoded economic concept that refuses to die and continues to generate terrible policies.
Wages do not rise with inflation; instead, they fall as increased prices eat away at paychecks. The dollar amounts on paychecks will increase, but not quickly enough to keep up with inflation. The news of salary hikes came just days after the government disclosed that prices had risen by 7% in the previous year. A more appropriate headline for last Friday’s coverage of Labor’s report would have been “Real Wages Fall by 3%.”
Based on inflation, what should the minimum wage be?
Consumer prices rose 5.3 percent in August compared to the previous year, causing some anxiety as the economy recovers from the pandemic. Food prices at home increased by 3%, while food prices away from home (i.e. restaurants) increased by 4.7 percent, according to the Bureau of Labor Statistics’ latest release this week. Rents and energy prices both increased by roughly 9%.
One point of worry for employers and employees in the United States is that activists frequently exploit inflation data to support their campaign for a $15 minimum wage, or even a higher salary of $23 per hour, despite the fact that study shows such steep rises will destroy millions of jobs.
Remember, if we kept up with inflation, the minimum wage would be $23/hr right now. $15 is a good middle ground. #RaiseTheWagehttps://t.co/44l6Rqln0F
Despite the fact that inflation has risen dramatically in the last year, the so-called “The Fight for $15” is still not based on a consumer price index. If the 2009 federal minimum wage increase to $7.25 per hour were indexed to climb with inflation, it would equal $9.22 today, according to Bureau of Labor Statistics data up to August 2021.
If the minimum wage were to be adjusted to the level in 1990, it would be $7.17 now. No matter how you slice it, these data don’t even come close to, let alone support, the $23 hourly rate proposed by the union-backed One Fair Wage.
Indeed, the $15 minimum wage goal that several states and municipalities have already enacted has no precedence in history. An organizing director for the Service Employees International Union’s Fight for $15 campaign joked about the absence of genuine analysis informing their main policy goal at one meeting, saying: “We decided that $10 was too low and $20 was too much, so we settled on $15.”
Unfortunately, these draconian minimum wage targets, which lack economic justification, will wreak havoc on firms and employees as they try to recover from the pandemic. According to the impartial Congressional Budget Office, the Raise the Wage Act of 2021, which proposes a $15 minimum wage nationwide, may cost the country up to 2.7 million jobs. According to economists from Miami and Trinity Universities’ industry and state-level analyses, the hospitality and restaurant industries would bear the brunt of these effects. Increases above the $15 minimum wage would have an even bigger negative impact on employer costs, and could result in the loss of many more employment.
Why should the minimum wage be increased?
What impact would raising the minimum wage have on employment? The cost of employing low-paid workers would rise if the minimum wage was raised. As a result, some firms would hire fewer people than they would if the minimum wage were lower. However, employment may increase for specific workers or in certain conditions.
The amount of jobless, not merely unemployed, workers would reflect changes in employment. People who are jobless include both those who have left the labor force (for example, because they believe there are no jobs available for them) and those who are looking for work.
How did the CBO calculate the employment effects? The amount of the effects, according to the CBO, is determined by the number of workers affected by the rise in the minimum wage, wage changes caused by the higher minimum wage, and the responsiveness of employment to those salary changes. If the minimum wage change affected more workers, if it resulted in larger mandated increases for directly affected workers, if firms had more time to respond (for example, because the change was phased in over a longer period), and if the minimum wage was indexed to inflation or wage growth, the effects would be greater in general.
See Appendix A of the CBO’s July 2019 report The Effects on Employment and Family Income of Increasing the Federal Minimum Wage for more information on the CBO’s analysis. Despite the fact that the 2020 coronavirus pandemic and the current recession had an impact on CBO’s baseline budget and economic projections for the years 20212030, CBO has not changed its methods for estimating how employment would respond to a higher minimum wage, in part because CBO expects employment to be near the level it was in the baseline projections underlying the 2019 report in a few years.
How long would people remain jobless if they lost their jobs as a result of a minimum-wage increase? At one extreme, a raise in the minimum wage might permanently lay off a tiny group of workers, preventing them from benefiting from increased pay. On the other hand, a big group of workers may bounce in and out of work on a regular basis, going unemployed for brief periods of time yet earning greater income during the weeks they were worked.
CBO used its estimates of the distribution of unemployment durations for the 20002020 period to assign directly affected workers either no joblessness or a duration of joblessness within the projection year that was randomly chosen from that distribution in analyzing the effects of joblessness on poverty. As a result, some workers in CBO’s analysis are unemployed for over a year, while others are unemployed for significantly shorter lengths of time.
What impact would raising the minimum wage have on family income? A higher minimum wage would increase the real income of low-wage employees who already have jobs, pulling some of those families out of poverty. However, some families’ incomes would suffer as a result of other workers being laid off and business owners having to bear at least some of the higher labor costs. As a result, raising the minimum wage would result in a net decrease in average family income.
What method did the CBO use to calculate the effects on family income? The CBO forecasted future family income distributions and then blended those projections with estimates of wage rates, employment, company income, and prices. Increases in the earnings of individuals who would have earned slightly more than the proposed minimum wage if the policy had not been implemented include increases in the wages of workers who would have earned slightly more than the proposed minimum wage if the policy had not been implemented. Losses in business owners’ income and consumer purchasing power would be somewhat compensated by an improvement in worker productivity as a result of higher pay. (This boost in production could come from a variety of sources, including a decrease in turnover.) See The Effects of Raising the Federal Minimum Wage on Employment and Family Income for further information.)
What impact would raising the minimum wage have on the number of individuals living in poverty? A higher minimum wage would elevate some families’ income beyond the poverty line and so reduce the number of people in poverty by increasing the income of low-paid workers with jobs. Low-wage workers who lose their jobs, on the other hand, will see their earnings plummet, and in certain situations, their family’s income will fall below the poverty line. The first effect would be stronger than the second, resulting in a decrease in the number of individuals living in poverty.
How did the CBO calculate the number of persons living in poverty? The CBO estimated the distribution of poverty in future years using the same methodology it used to project the distribution of family income, using the same definitions of income and poverty criteria as the Census Bureau. According to the CBO, the poverty line will be $21,260 for a family of three and $26,850 for a family of four in 2025 (in 2021 dollars).
What is the probability of these outcomes? The magnitude of any option’s effects on employment and family income is highly unknown. There are two primary causes for this. First, future wage increase is questionable under existing law. If wages grow faster than the CBO predicts, wages will be higher in future years than the CBO predicts, and increases in the federal minimum wage will have a lower impact. The effects would be greater if wages grew more slowly than the CBO predicted.
Second, there is a lot of ambiguity regarding whether or not a raise in the minimum wage will affect employment. Increases in the minimum wage would result in bigger job losses if employment is more responsive than the CBO predicts. If employment is less responsive than the CBO predicts, however, the decreases will be less. The study literature on how changes in the federal minimum wage effect employment reveals a wide range of results. Many studies have found little or no effect, whereas others have discovered significant job losses.
Is it possible that raising the minimum wage will have unintended consequences? Studies have looked at the relationship between minimum wages and a variety of outcomes other than employment and family income, such as labor force participation (whether a person is working or actively looking for work), health outcomes like depression, suicide, and obesity, education outcomes like school completion and job training, and social outcomes like crime. In this research, CBO did not go into the other possible outcomes. However, Appendix B of The Effects on Employment and Family Income of Increasing the Federal Minimum Wage contains a list of sources.
The CBO calculated how a $15 minimum wage option would effect the federal budget in The Budgetary Effects of the Raise the Wage Act of 2021. Changes in macroeconomic factors like inflation and aggregate income were factored into the analysis.
How have the estimations generated by this tool altered as a result of the updates? The current version of the tool produces different results than the first version released in 2019. This is due to two factors. To begin, the alternatives would be introduced in 2022 rather than 2020, though they would be fully implemented on January 1st, 2025, 2026, or 2027, as in the previous version. Under existing law, earnings would grow over time, so any increase in the minimum wage would have a smaller impact on wages, and thus on employment and family income, if it occurred later. Second, because changes in mean salaries are the most important contributor to budgetary effect estimations, the tool now displays mean (rather than median) estimates from distributions of anticipated outcomes. The means are often greater than the medians because those distributions include some really large values. See The Budgetary Effects of the Raise the Wage Act of 2021 for a more in-depth look at these changes.
The CBO also changed the size of incremental changes to the minimum wage leading up to the policy’s target minimum wage. The overall increase in the minimum wage was allocated evenly across the years of a policy’s implementation in the original version of the tool. Annual minimum wage increases are equivalent to those imposed by the Raise the Wage Act of 2021 in the updated edition. As a result, the biggest gains occur in the first year after a policy is implemented.
How does the Raise the Wage Act vary from the default policy option? This interactive’s default option closely resembles the Raise the Wage Act of 2021, which the CBO analyzed in its February 2021 report. The standard minimum, for example, reaches $15 per hour four years after the first incremental increase, the subminimum for tipped workers reaches parity with the regular minimum two years after the regular minimum reaches $15, and both minimums are indexed to changes in median hourly wages once they reach their targets. The key difference is that the first incremental rise occurs on January 1, 2022 in this interactive, whereas it was anticipated for June 1, 2021 in the February 2021 report.
What are the disadvantages of increasing the minimum wage?
- Despite numerous attempts to raise the minimum wage, no bill has ever passed both chambers of Congress.
- Minimum wage supporters claim that reforms are needed to help salaries keep up with rising living costs, and that a higher minimum wage will raise millions of people out of poverty.
- Opponents of raising the minimum wage claim that increased salaries will have various negative consequences, including inflation, decreased company competitiveness, and job losses.
Why is increasing the minimum wage a bad idea?
- The Biden administration wants to increase the federal minimum wage from $7.25 to $15 per hour.
- While a $15 minimum wage may benefit some employed employees, the existing data on the supply and demand side of the labor market suggests that it will price others out of the market and exacerbate the problems faced by many small firms.
- On the supply side of the labor market, Black and Hispanic workers, as well as those with lower educational attainment, are most at risk of remaining unemployed; these groups make up a significant proportion of minimum wage earners and are heavily represented in industries that have been negatively affected by the COVID-19 pandemic.
- Small businesses have been severely harmed by the pandemic on the demand side; at its worst, 41 percent of small enterprises in low-income areas closed, with a 46 percent reduction in sales since January 2020.
As part of its COVID-19 economic assistance package, the Biden administration proposes raising the federal minimum wage from $7.25 to $15 per hour. Some argue that by using the budget reconciliation procedure, Congress might raise the minimum wage with a simple majority vote in the Senate. An rise in the minimum wage, especially one as large as the one suggested, would benefit some workers while excluding others from the labor market. According to labor supply data, there are millions of unemployed employees who are low-skilled and have a low level of education. Because of the $15 minimum wage, many employees are likely to remain unemployed. On the demand side, many businesses are facing declining net revenues and, in some cases, closure; this is especially true of small enterprises already hurt by the COVID-19 crisis, which employ a disproportionate number of those individuals. A $15 minimum wage would not only stifle recovery, but it would also harm many of the employees it is supposed to aid.
The pandemic has had an impact on practically every aspect of the economy, but some industries and people have been hit particularly hard. Knowing which industries and types of workers are the most affected by the present economic environment might help determine where a significant rise in the minimum wage will cause the most harm and potentially result in more people losing their jobs.
While the Biden Administration has stated that it is committed to helping low-income individuals and families, particularly those from Black and Hispanic communities, a federally enforced minimum wage of $15 will disproportionately harm these employees. The pandemic’s destructive impact on communities of color has been extensively studied. For example, black and Latino workers make up about a quarter of the service industry workforce yet are underrepresented in management roles. Black and Hispanic workers make up 13 and 24 percent of the workforce in the leisure and hospitality business, respectively.
** Estimates for the racial groupings listed above
Because data for all races is not supplied, the terms white, black, and African American do not add up to totals. People of any race who identify as Hispanic or Latino might be Hispanic or Latino. I
Although the employment situation for Black and Hispanic employees has improved since the peak of unemployment, these groups remain disproportionately represented among the unemployed. A significant increase in the federal minimum wage could push those who are already unemployed out of the labor market, potentially resulting in more layoffs or job losses.
Those with a lower educational level are another group of workers that are particularly vulnerable. According to data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS), employees who did not complete high school were disproportionately affected by the pandemic, with unemployment soaring to 21% and remaining roughly double that of 2019. Workers with a bachelor’s degree or more, on the other hand, are seeing their jobless rates rebound to 2019 levels. Workers with lower educational attainment are more likely to work at or below the minimum wage, which is unsurprising. Because up-skilling and reskilling programs are not widely available in the United States, and higher education is sometimes prohibitively expensive, workers with low educational attainment and low skills will most likely feel the effects of increasing minimum wage.
Even as the economy begins to recover, the COVID-19 pandemic has forced many firms, particularly small businesses, to close permanently or function on razor-thin margins. Many of these enterprises are already operating in a difficult climate, having had to absorb expenditures connected with increased safety precautions and state-mandated company closures while losing revenue due to decreased activity.
The expense of a $15 minimum wage might drive the most vulnerable businesses to stop hiring, reduce employee hours, eliminate positions, or close entirely.
When COVID-19 initially began to have an impact on businesses, layoffs were concentrated in industries that required in-person assistance. The leisure and hospitality business, for example, saw 40% unemployment at its height and had the highest proportion of low-wage workers, according to 2019 BLS statistics. Mining, construction, transportation, and food services are among the other businesses that have been severely impacted by the pandemic. While there has been progress, unemployment in these industries remains high.
Given the high concentrations of low-paid workers in these industries, many of whom are now unemployed, raising the minimum wage to $15 would create additional barriers to speedy reopening and rehiring, resulting in long-term unemployment for the least educated and skilled individuals.
Due to a lack of revenue and required closures, the pandemic prompted many small businesses to close temporarily; it also forced numerous enterprises to close permanently. The highest percent change in the number of open small enterprises occurred in April 2020, with a 44 percent decrease from January 2020.
The changes in the leisure and hospitality industry, which showed an almost 50% fall in open small enterprises in April 2020 compared to January 2020, are particularly noteworthy. This industry employs the vast majority of people who would be directly impacted by minimum wage hikes, many of whom are likely currently unemployed.
As previously said, closures due to reduced business and mandates resulted in income loss; while many larger businesses were able to withstand the loss, many small enterprises were forced to close permanently or resort to layoffs as a cost-cutting solution. While the Paycheck Protection Program loans, which were established as part of the Coronavirus Aid, Relief, and Economic Security Act, brought temporary relief to many, businesses are still struggling.
Despite an increase in revenues from April to December, the status of the leisure and hospitality business remains fragile, particularly as the number of cases continues to rise.
Given that the typical non-supervisory wage in the leisure and hospitality industry is less than the proposed $15 minimum wage, these businesses would have to manage the impact of increased costs, which would reduce net revenue even further. Many small firms would be forced to raise prices, limiting demand for goods and services, or reduce hiring, cut worker hours, or eliminate positions if the minimum wage was raised.
An rise in the federal minimum wage will worsen the economic loss already experienced by many firms and their employees. While those who are able to keep their jobs will undoubtedly profit from the raise, many others will suffer further consequences. The enormous number of unemployed people who previously worked as low-wage workers in businesses that have been hit the hardest by the pandemic are particularly vulnerable. It’s unclear whether those personnel will be required to return during this period. As firms balance reduced revenues and increasing expenditures, adding a federally required cost in the form of an increased minimum wage would result in extended unemployment, reduced work hours or hiring, and increased layoffs for low-paid workers.
https://www.bls.gov/news.release/empsit.t04.htm; https://www.bls.gov/opub/reports/minimum-wage/2019/home.htm#cps mw whe char.f.1; https://www.bls.gov/opub/reports/minimum-wage/2019/home.htm#cps mw whe_
Why should the minimum wage be increased to $15?
Legislators submitted the “Raise the Wage Act of 2021” in January 2021, with the goal of raising the federal minimum wage from $7.25 per hour to $15 per hour by 2025. It would be the first hike in more than a decade, and the longest since 1938, if passed.
Many state and local governments have already established a $15 minimum wage, while the federal minimum wage has stayed unchanged. (In 2014, for example, Seattle mandated that employers gradually raise their minimum wage until it hits $15 per hour.) Seattle’s minimum wage will be $16.69 per hour in 2021.) Nonetheless, such a huge change at the federal level will undoubtedly be controversial and hotly disputed.
Advantages
Raising the federal minimum wage to $15 per hour would help low-income people improve their overall level of life. These workers would be able to cover their monthly expenses more readily, such as rent, car payments, and other household costs. “Today, a full-time worker cannot afford a basic, two-bedroom apartment in any county in the United States,” said Representative Robert Scott, leader of the House Committee on Education and Labor. Senator Bernie Sanders has also stated that the minimum wage should be $15, as he feels that full-time workers should not be forced to live in poverty.
A second, less visible benefit of hiking the minimum wage has been proposed: improved staff morale. Not only will happier employees make for a more cohesive and effective workforce, but they may also increase customer satisfaction. Furthermore, if employees are happy with their jobs and compensation, they are less likely to leave, which saves the company money on hiring and training.
Proponents say that raising the minimum wage to $15 will assist women and minorities. A $15 minimum wage would improve the pay of 31% of African Americans and 26% of Latinos. Furthermore, a disproportionate number of minority workers live in one of the 21 states with a $7.25-per-hour minimum wage.
Disadvantages
Small firms, according to opponents of raising the minimum wage, would suffer as a result of such a significant increase. An rise in the federal minimum wage will dramatically increase small businesses’ operating costs and tighten profits, just as they are beginning to recover from the international Covid-19 outbreak.
Raising the minimum wage to $15 would also boost daycare expenditures by 21% on average in the United States. In 2019, the average hourly wage for an early childcare worker in the United States was $11.65. As a result, a nationally enforced $15 minimum wage would nearly triple the cost of labor for childcare providers.
Advocates on both sides will continue to cite several reasons in favor of their viewpoints as the federal minimum wage debate continues to elicit passionate opinions. Those who oppose a minimum wage claim that market forces should be in charge. If there is a lot of competition for talented personnel, a business may have little choice but to raise salaries to keep staff. Employers and employees should be aware of both sides of the issue and prepare for a change in the federal minimum wage law that is almost certain to occur.
(This article was greatly aided by Logan Adams, a spring clerk in our Dallas office.)
Is having a minimum wage beneficial to society?
On moral, social, and economic grounds, minimum wages have been supported. However, the overarching goal is to raise wages and increase the well-being of low-wage workers while also reducing inequality and fostering social inclusion.
Is everyone getting a raise in 2022 when the minimum wage rises?
An economy that works for everyone is necessary for progress and the well-being of working families.
President Biden signed the Minimum Wage Executive Order on April 27, 2021, and the Department of Labor’s Wage and Hour Division issued the implementing regulations, ensuring that workers on federal contracts are paid a fair wage and demonstrating that the government can lead by example.
We’re boosting the minimum pay for government contract workers to $15.00 per hour beginning January 30, 2022. This rise, which will effect more than 300,000 workers, comes at a time when the federal government is making historic investments in our nation’s infrastructure, which will result in the creation of millions of new jobs in construction and associated industries.
While construction employees will be covered by the $15 minimum wage, workers in child care, health care, and building and other services on government contracts will also be covered. Women make up around 54% of those affected by the minimum wage rise, while workers of color make up roughly 25%. Workers who benefit from our final minimum wage rule will receive an average annual rise of $5,228.
Raising the minimum wage strengthens families’ financial security, decreases poverty, and moves the country closer to reversing decades of income inequality. Better government services, increased morale and productivity, and fewer turnover and absenteeism are all possible additional benefits.
The rule also protects workers on government contracts, in addition to raising the minimum wage:
- Raising the minimum pay for disabled workers who would otherwise earn less than the minimum wage.
- Starting Jan. 1, 2023, federal contract workers who get tips will be paid at least 85 percent of the entire minimum wage in cash, and 100 percent starting Jan. 1, 2024.
- Workers who provide recreational activities on public lands should have their minimum wage rights restored.
As of January 30, 2021, these modifications will apply to most new contracts, including renewals and extensions. They apply to federal contract workers in all 50 states, as well as the District of Columbia, Puerto Rico, the Virgin Islands, Outer Continental Shelf lands as defined in the Outer Continental Shelf Lands Act, American Samoa, Guam, the Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana Islands, Wake Island, and Johnston Island, as well as the District of Columbia.
As a government employee, I witness firsthand how the labor of federal contract workers keeps the government functioning and ensures that the American people have access to critical services and resources. Executive Order 14026, which I am happy to sign, will help hundreds of thousands of hardworking people, their families, and our communities.
Would you like to understand more about this rule and what it implications for businesses? On the 26th and 27th of January, register for one of our federal contractor seminars.
Is the United Kingdom’s minimum wage linked to inflation?
Since their inception in the United Kingdom, the national minimum and living wages have risen every year. However, this does not imply that they have kept up with rising living costs.
Chancellor Rishi Sunak announced an increase in the national living and minimum wages in his Autumn Budget, declaring that the higher rates “guarantee we’re making work pay and maintains us on track to reach our commitment to abolish low pay by the end of this Parliament.”
Every country in the globe has its own system for determining the minimum wage, as well as the amounts that should be paid to different age groups.
Some countries have a minimum pay per hour, whereas others have a minimum wage per working day, week, or month. Many countries still do not have any kind of minimum wage at all.
In general, the national minimum wage in this country rises by roughly 4% per year, in accordance with inflation rates. If the minimum wage does not keep pace with inflation, people will grow poorer despite earning the same amount of money.
Naturally, different countries have varying living costs, inflation rates, and average wages. But, in the broader scheme of things, how does the United Kingdom fare? And who has the world’s highest minimum wage?