During recessions, economic stimulus is frequently used. Lowering interest rates, increasing government expenditure, and quantitative easing, to mention a few, are all common policy strategies used to achieve economic stimulation.
How can the government assist in the recovery of the economy during a downturn?
- To impact economic performance, the US government employs two types of policies: monetary policy and fiscal policy. Both have the same goal in mind: to assist the economy in achieving full employment and price stability.
- It is carried out by the Federal Reserve System (“the Fed”), an independent government institution with the authority to control the money supply and interest rates.
- When the Fed believes inflation is a problem, it will employ contractionary policy, which involves reducing the money supply and raising interest rates. It will utilize expansionary policies to boost the money supply and lower interest rates in order to combat a recession.
- When the economy is in a slump, the government will either raise spending, lower taxes, or do both to stimulate the economy.
- When inflation occurs, the government will either cut spending or raise taxes, or both.
- A surplus occurs when the government collects more money (via taxes) than it spends in a given year.
- When the government spends more money than it receives, we have a budget deficit.
- The national debtthe total amount of money owed by the federal governmentis the sum of all deficits.
What can the government do to help the economy grow?
When a government chooses fiscal stimulus, it lowers taxes or raises spending in order to stimulate the economy. When taxes are reduced, people have more money available to them. People have more money to spend when their disposable income rises, which boosts demand, production, and economic growth. When the government spends more, it puts more money into the economy, which lowers unemployment, boosts spending, and eventually mitigates the effects of a recession.
What was the government’s response to the recession?
During times of national crises, Congress has responded by directing federal resources and programs to help struggling Americans. While it is critical to respond rapidly to crises, it is also critical to ensure that federal programs and public resources are used as intended.
The GAO’s involvement during times of crisis is examined in today’s WatchBlog piece, which focuses on the federal response to the Great Depression, the Great Recession, and the coronavirus outbreak.
When the stock market crashed in 1929, precipitating the lengthy period of economic decline known as the Great Depression, GAO was still a relatively young organization.
In reaction to the Great Depression, Congress passed President Franklin D. Roosevelt’s New Deal, which included $41.7 billion in funding for domestic initiatives such as unemployment compensation.
GAO’s workload grew as federal funds were poured into the 1930s’ recovery and relief efforts. GAO, which had around 1,700 employees at the time, quickly ran out of employees and needed to hire more to handle paperwork such as vouchers. Our staff had nearly tripled to 5,000 by 1939.
Our auditors began extending their involvement in overseeing federal programs at the same time. Fieldwork in Kentucky and numerous southern states began in the mid-1930s, and included examinations of government agriculture programs. This steady shift in goal from acting as federal accountants to serving as program and policy analysts would last until 2003, when the General Accounting Office was renamed the Government Accountability Office.
The Great Recession, which began in December 2007, was widely regarded as the country’s worst economic downturn since the Great Depression.
As a result, Congress passed the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009, which contained $800 billion in stimulus funding to help the economy recover.
GAO was given a number of tasks under the Recovery Act to help enhance accountability and openness in the use of those funds. For example, we conducted bimonthly assessments of how monies were spent by various states and municipalities. In addition, we conducted specialized research in areas such as small company loans, education, and trade adjustment aid.
Despite the fact that the Great Recession ended in 2009, we are still investigating its effects on the soundness of our financial system and related government support. For example, in response to the 2008 housing crisis, the Treasury Department established three housing programs utilizing TARP funds to assist struggling homeowners avoid foreclosure and keep their homes. TARP programs were assessed every 60 days during the recession and subsequent years, and we proposed steps to improve Treasury’s management and use of funds. This effort continues today, with annual audits of TARP financial statements and updates on active TARP projects. In December 2020, we released our most current report.
We’re also keeping an eye on the health of the nation’s housing finance system, which includes Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, which buy mortgages from lenders and either hold them or bundle them into mortgage-backed securities that can be sold.
Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac were taken over by the federal government in 2008, and the role has remained unchanged for the past 13 years, keeping taxpayers on the line for any possible losses sustained by the two corporations. We wrote about the dangers of this prolonged conservatorship and the need to overhaul the home finance system in January 2019.
Congress approved $4.7 trillion in emergency funding for people, businesses, the health-care system, and state and municipal governments in response to the pandemic. We’ve been following the federal response by, among other things, providing reports on the pandemic’s and response efforts’ effects on federal programs and operations on a regular basis.
Vaccine development and distribution, small business lending, unemployment payments, economic relief checks, tax refund delays, K-12 and higher education’s response to COVID-19, housing protections, and other topics have all been covered in our work.
On July 19, we released our most recent report on the federal response, as well as our recommendations for how this effort might be improved further. In October, we will publish our next report. Visit our Coronavirus Oversight page often because we’ll keep you updated on the federal reaction to COIVD-19 as the situation unfolds.
GAO has played a key role in overseeing federal expenditures and programs during times of crisis, and we continue to do so in more normal times. We produce hundreds of reports each year and testify before dozens of congressional committees and subcommittees on problems that affect our country. We saved taxpayers $77.6 billion in government spending in fiscal year 2020. For every dollar Congress invests in us, we get $114!
How can the economy recover from a downturn?
A drop in demand within the economy whether from businesses, consumers, the government, or other countries is the primary cause of an economic recession. As a result, the most effective response will be determined by the recession’s core cause.
If consumer spending is down, it might be a good idea to lower taxes. This will provide them with additional cash and encourage increased economic spending. A slowdown in corporate investment, on the other hand, may necessitate lower interest rates in order to reduce debt burdens.
Reduce Taxes
When governments lower taxes, they frequently do so at the expense of increasing the budget deficit. The government obtains fewer tax revenues but maintains the same level of spending, giving the economy a benefit overall. While this raises the budget deficit, it also increases the amount of money in the hands of the typical consumer.
How does the government influence the economy through government spending?
Government expenditure can be a valuable instrument for governments in terms of economic policy. The use of government spending and/or taxation as a method to influence an economy is known as fiscal policy. Expansionary fiscal policy and contractionary fiscal policy are the two types of fiscal policy. Expansionary fiscal policy is defined as an increase in government expenditure or a reduction in taxation, whereas contractionary fiscal policy is defined as a reduction in government spending or an increase in taxes. Governments can utilize expansionary fiscal policy to stimulate the economy during a downturn. Increases in government spending, for example, immediately enhance demand for products and services, which can assist boost output and employment. Governments, on the other hand, can utilize contractionary fiscal policy to calm down the economy during a boom. Reduced government spending can assist to keep inflation under control. In the short run, during economic downturns, government spending can be adjusted either by automatic stabilization or discretionary stabilization. Automatic stabilization occurs when current policies adjust government spending or taxation in response to economic shifts without the need for new legislation. Unemployment insurance, which offers cash help to unemployed people, is a prime example of an automatic stabilizer. When a government responds to changes in the economy by changing government spending or taxes, this is known as discretionary stabilization. For example, as a result of the recession, a government may opt to raise government spending. To make changes to federal expenditure under discretionary stabilization, the government must adopt a new law.
One of the earliest economists to call for government deficit spending as part of a fiscal policy response to a recession was John Maynard Keynes. Increased government spending, according to Keynesian economics, improves aggregate demand and consumption, resulting in increased production and a faster recovery from recessions. Classical economists, on the other hand, think that greater government expenditure exacerbates an economic downturn by diverting resources from the productive private sector to the unproductive public sector.
Crowding out is the term used in economics to describe the possible “moving” of resources from the private to the public sector as a result of increased government deficit expenditure. The market for capital, also known as the market for loanable funds, is depicted in the diagram to the right. The downward sloping demand curve D1 indicates company and investor demand for private capital, whereas the upward sloping supply curve S1 represents private individual savings. Point A represents the initial equilibrium in this market, where the equilibrium capital quantity is K1 and the equilibrium interest rate is R1. If the government spends more than it saves, it will have to borrow money from the private capital market, reducing the supply of savings to S2. The new equilibrium is at point B, where the interest rate has risen to R2 and the amount of private capital accessible has reduced to K2. The government has effectively raised borrowing costs and removed savings from the market, effectively “crowding out” some private investment. Private investment could be stifled, limiting the economic growth spurred by the initial surge in government spending.
What can the government do to help the economy stabilise?
Governments may focus on macroeconomic stabilization in the near term, such as increasing spending or reducing taxes to stimulate a struggling economy, or cutting expenditure or raising taxes to counteract rising inflation or minimize external vulnerabilities.
When the economy is in a downturn, what can the government do?
- The use of government spending and tax policies to impact economic circumstances is referred to as fiscal policy.
- Fiscal policy is largely founded on the views of John Maynard Keynes, who claimed that governments could regulate economic activity and stabilize the business cycle.
- During a recession, the government may use expansionary fiscal policy to boost aggregate demand and boost economic growth by decreasing tax rates.
- A government may follow a contractionary fiscal strategy in the face of rising inflation and other expansionary signs.
How do you encourage economic expansion?
- AD stands for aggregate demand (consumer spending, investment levels, government spending, exports-imports)
- AS stands for aggregate supply (Productive capacity, the efficiency of economy, labour productivity)
To increase economic growth
1. An increase in total demand
- Lower interest rates lower borrowing costs and boost consumer spending and investment.
- Increased real wages when nominal salaries rise faster than inflation, consumers have more money to spend.
- Depreciation reduces the cost of exports while raising the cost of imports, increasing domestic demand.
- Growing wealth, such as rising house values, encourages people to spend more (since they are more confident and can refinance their home).
This represents a rise in total supply (productive capacity). This can happen as a result of:
- In the nineteenth century, new technologies such as steam power and telegrams aided productivity. In the twenty-first century, the internet, artificial intelligence, and computers are all helping to boost productivity.
- Workers become more productive when new management approaches, such as better industrial relations, are introduced.
- Increased net migration, with a particular emphasis on workers with in-demand skills (e.g. builders, fruit pickers)
- Infrastructure improvements, greater education spending, and other public-sector investments are examples of public-sector investment.
To what extent can the government increase economic growth?
A government can use demand-side and supply-side policies to try to influence the rate of economic growth.
- Cutting taxes to raise disposable income and encourage spending is known as expansionary fiscal policy. Lower taxes, on the other hand, will increase the budget deficit and lead to more borrowing. When there is a drop in consumer expenditure, an expansionary fiscal policy is most appropriate.
- Cutting interest rates can promote domestic demand. Expansionary monetary policy (currently usually set by an independent Central Bank).
- Stability. The government’s primary job is to maintain economic and political stability, which allows for normal economic activity to occur. Uncertainty and political polarization can deter investment and growth.
- Infrastructure investment, such as new roads, railway lines, and broadband internet, boosts productivity and lowers traffic congestion.
Factors beyond the government’s influence
- It is difficult for the government to influence the rate of technical innovation because it tends to come from the private sector.
- The private sector is in charge of labor relations and employee motivation. At best, the government has a minimal impact on employee morale and motivation.
- Entrepreneurs are primarily self-motivated when it comes to starting a firm. Government restrictions and tax rates can have an impact on a business owner’s willingness to take risks.
- The amount of money saved has an impact on growth (e.g. see Harrod-Domar model) Higher savings enable higher investment, yet influencing savings might be difficult for the government.
- Willingness to put forth the effort. The vanquished countries of Germany and Japan had fast economic development in the postwar period, indicating a desire to rebuild after the war. The UK economy was less dynamic, which could be due to different views toward employment and a willingness to try new things.
- Any economy is influenced significantly by global growth. It is extremely difficult for a single economy to avoid the costs of a global recession. The credit crunch of 2009, for example, had a detrimental impact on economic development in OECD countries.
In 2009, the United States, France, and the United Kingdom all went into recession. The greater recovery in the United States, on the other hand, could be attributed to different governmental measures. 2009/10 fiscal policy was expansionary, and monetary policy was looser.
Governments frequently overestimate their ability to boost productivity growth. Without government intervention, the private sector drives the majority of technological advancement. Supply-side measures can help boost efficiency to some level, but how much they can boost growth rates is questionable.
For example, after the 1980s supply-side measures, the government looked for a supply-side miracle that would allow for a significantly quicker pace of economic growth. The Lawson boom of the 1980s, however, proved unsustainable, and the UK’s growth rate stayed relatively constant at roughly 2.5 percent. Supply-side initiatives, at the very least, will take a long time to implement; for example, improving labor productivity through education and training will take many years.
There is far more scope for the government to increase growth rates in developing economies with significant infrastructure failures and a lack of basic amenities.
The potential for higher growth rates is greatly increased by providing basic levels of education and infrastructure.
The private sector is responsible for the majority of productivity increases. With a few exceptions, private companies are responsible for the majority of technical advancements. The great majority of productivity gains in the UK is due to new technologies developed by the private sector. I doubt the government’s ability to invest in new technologies to enhance productivity growth at this rate. (Though it is possible especially in times of conflict)
Economic growth in the UK
The UK economy has risen at a rate of 2.5 percent each year on average since 1945. Most economists believe that the UK’s productive capacity can grow at a rate of roughly 2.5 percent per year on average. The underlying trend rate is also known as the ‘trend rate of growth.’
Even when the government pursued supply-side reforms, they were largely ineffective in changing the long-run trend rate. (For example, in the 1980s, supply-side policies had minimal effect on the long-run trend rate.)
The graph below demonstrates how, since 2008, actual GDP has fallen below the trend rate. Because of the recession and a considerable drop in aggregate demand, this happened.
- Improved private-sector technology that allows for increased labor productivity (e.g. development of computers enables greater productivity)
- Infrastructure investment, such as the construction of new roads and train lines. The government is mostly responsible for this.
How can the government use supply-side strategies to boost the economy?
- According to supply-side economics, increasing a country’s supply of goods leads to economic growth.
- Practitioners of supply-side fiscal policy frequently focus on decreasing taxes, lowering borrowing rates, and deregulating businesses in order to encourage more production.
- In the 1970s, supply-side fiscal policy was proposed as an alternative to Keynesian demand-side policy.
- On both theoretical and empirical grounds, the validity of this idea is still debatable, having proponents on both sides of the debate.
How did the government respond to the financial crisis of 2008?
Congress passed the Struggling Asset Relief Scheme (TARP) to empower the US Treasury to implement a major rescue program for troubled banks. The goal was to avoid a national and global economic meltdown. To end the recession, ARRA and the Economic Stimulus Plan were passed in 2009.