When inflation rises against the backdrop of a booming economy, central banks, such as the Federal Reserve, may raise interest rates in order to slow the rate of inflation. Consumer borrowing may slow when interest rates rise, since fewer loans are taken out. Interest rate hikes, on the other hand, can help lenders make more money, especially with variable-rate credit products like credit cards.
Do banks fare well during periods of high inflation?
Inflation in the United States continues to rise, with the price index for American consumer spending (PCE index), the Fed’s preferred measure of inflation, rising at a rate of 4.2 percent in the year ended July, its highest level in over 30 years. Furthermore, core prices rose 3.6 percent, excluding volatile goods like food and energy. The figures come as a result of rising demand for products and services, which has outpaced supply systems’ ability to keep up following the Covid-19 lockdowns. Although the Fed is optimistic that inflation will fall, noting that it would likely lower its $120 billion in monthly asset purchases this year, the figure is still significantly above the Fed’s target of 2% inflation.
However, we believe that inflation will continue to be slightly higher than historical levels for some years. Personal savings, for example, have increased as a result of the epidemic, and the continuance of low interest rates over the next two years could result in higher prices for goods and services. Companies in the banking, insurance, consumer staples, and energy sectors are among the companies in our Inflation Stocks category that could stay steady or even benefit from high inflation. Compared to the S&P 500, which is up roughly 18% year to date, the theme has returned around 15%. Exxon Mobil has been the best performer in our topic, with a year-to-date gain of 28 percent. Chubb’s stock has also performed well this year, with a gain of roughly 20% thus far. Procter & Gamble, on the other hand, has been the worst performer, with its stock climbing only roughly 4% year to date.
Inflation in the United States surged to its highest level since 2008 in June, as the economy continues to recover from the Covid-19-related lockdowns. According to the Labor Department, the consumer price index increased by 5.4 percent year over year, while the core price index, which excludes food and energy, increased by 4.5 percent. Prices have risen as a result of increased demand for products and services, which has outpaced enterprises’ ability to meet it. Although supply-side bottlenecks should be resolved in the coming quarters, variables such as large stimulus spending, a jump in the US personal savings rate, and a continuance of the low-interest rate environment over the next two years could suggest inflation will remain high in the near future.
So, how should equities investors respond to the current inflationary climate? Companies in the banking, insurance, consumer staples, and energy sectors are among the companies in our Inflation Stocks category that could stay steady or even benefit from high inflation. Year-to-date, the theme has returned nearly 16%, roughly in line with the S&P 500. It has, however, underperformed since the end of 2019, remaining about flat in comparison to the S&P 500, which is up around 35%. Exxon Mobil, the world’s largest oil and gas company, has been the best performer in our topic, with a year-to-date gain of about 43%. Procter & Gamble, on the other hand, has underperformed, with its price holding approximately flat.
Inflation in the United States has been rising as a result of plentiful liquidity, skyrocketing demand following the Covid-19 lockdowns, and supply-side limitations. The Federal Reserve increased its inflation projections for 2021 on Wednesday, forecasting a 3.4 percent increase in personal consumption expenditures – its preferred inflation gauge – this year, a full percentage point more than its March projection of 2.4 percent. The central bank made no adjustments to its ambitious bond-buying program and said interest rates will remain near zero percent through 2023, while signaling two rate hikes.
So, how should stock investors respond to the current inflationary climate and the possibility of increased interest rates? Stocks in the banking, insurance, consumer staples, and energy sectors might stay constant or possibly gain from increasing inflation rates, according to our Inflation Stocks theme. The theme has outpaced the market, with a year-to-date return of almost 17% vs just over 13% for the S&P 500. It has, however, underperformed since the end of 2019, remaining about flat in comparison to the S&P 500, which is up almost 31%. Exxon Mobil, the world’s largest oil and gas company, has been the best performer in our subject, climbing 56 percent year to far. Procter & Gamble, on the other hand, has lagged the market this year, with its shares down approximately 5%.
Inflation has been rising, owing to central banks’ expansionary monetary policies, pent-up demand for commodities following the Coivd-19 lockdowns, company inventory replenishment or build-up, and major supply-side constraints. Now it appears that inflation is here to stay, with the 10-Year Breakeven Inflation rate, which represents predicted inflation rates over the next ten years, hovering around 2.4 percent, its highest level since 2013.
So, how should equities investors respond to the current inflationary climate? Stocks To Play Rising Inflation is a subject that contains stocks that could stay stable or possibly gain from higher inflation rates. The theme has outpaced the market, with a year-to-date return of almost 18% vs just over 12% for the S&P 500. However, it has underperformed since the end of 2019, returning only roughly 1% compared to 30% for the S&P 500. The theme consists primarily of stocks in the banking, insurance, consumer staples, and energy sectors, all of which are expected to gain from greater inflation in the long run. Metals, building materials, and electronics manufacturing have been eliminated because they performed exceptionally well during the initial reopening but appear to be nearing their peak. Here’s some more information on the stocks and sectors that make up our theme.
Banking Stocks: Banks profit from the net interest spread, which is the difference between the interest rates on deposits and the interest rates on loans they make. Higher inflation now often leads to higher interest rates, which can help banks increase their net interest revenue and earnings. Banks, on the other hand, will benefit from increased credit card spending by customers. Citigroup and U.S. Bank are two banks in our subject that have a stronger exposure to retail banking. Citigroup’s stock is up 26% year to date, while U.S. Bancorp is up 28%.
Insurance stocks: Underwriting surplus cash is often invested to create interest revenue by insurance companies. Inflationary pressures, which result in increased interest rates, can now aid boost their profits. Companies like The Travelers Companies and Chubb, who rely on investment income more than their peers in the insurance industry, should profit. This year, Travelers stock has increased by around 12%, while Chubb has increased by 8%.
Consumer staples: Consumer equities should be able to withstand increasing inflation. Because these enterprises deal with critical products, demand remains consistent, and they can pass on greater costs to customers. Our theme includes tobacco behemoth Altria Group, which is up 21% this year, food and beverage behemoth PepsiCo, which is almost flat, and consumer goods behemoth Procter & Gamble, which is down around 1%.
Oil and Gas: During periods of rising consumer prices, energy equities have performed admirably. While growing economies are good for oil demand and pricing, huge oil corporations have a lot of operating leverage, which allows them to make more money as revenue climbs. Exxon Mobil, which has gained a stunning 43 percent this year, and Chevron, which has risen roughly 23 percent, are two of our theme’s picks.
Heavy equipment manufacturers, electrical systems suppliers, automation solutions providers, and semiconductor fabrication equipment players are among the companies in our Capex Cycle Stocks category that stand to benefit from increased capital investment by businesses and the government.
What if you’d rather have a more well-balanced portfolio? Since the end of 2016, this high-quality portfolio has regularly outperformed the market.
What effect does inflation have on bank profits?
For the high-inflation countries, the real time deposit rate was around 3%. Savings are discouraged by negative real interest rates because savers lose purchasing power. Most importantly, we discover that inflation has a significant negative influence on bank profitability.
How do banks fare during a downturn?
Even if we don’t fully understand what a recession is, we do know one thing about this dreaded word: it’s terrible news. Unfortunately, our investment rating was reduced to junk status in June 2017, and it was also announced that South Africa was in recession. Still, there’s no reason to be alarmed. Here, we define the term “recession” and show you how to navigate its choppy waters.
A technical recession usually happens when a country’s economic production falls for two (or more) consecutive quarters. There is some good development following the initial downward shift, but it does not sustain. Unfortunately, as reported by The Conversation, South Africa’s gross domestic product (GDP) decreased 0.7 percent in the first quarter of 2017, following a 0.3 percent contraction in the fourth quarter of 2016; a recession was inescapable.
During a recession, the first pattern that develops is that people cut back on their expenditure. People prefer to focus on saving when faced with the uncertainty that comes with a recession.
Unfortunately, most people are unaware that this is their natural reaction, and that it maintains a bad cycle. Less spending implies less consumption, which weakens the economy even more. As a result, the cycle repeats itself. Banks frequently lower interest rates during a recession to encourage borrowing and investing (an attempt to stimulate the economy). As the government strives to foster economic growth through policy changes, taxes and government spending vary as well. However, in the long run, this method may have a detrimental impact on the economy by raising interest rates.
During a recession, it’s vital to be prudent, but conserving everything and refusing to allow yourself modest indulgences like eating out once in a while or buying the clothes you need would only exacerbate the problem. Of course, you should be doing what you should have been doing all along creating and sticking to a budget to avoid overspending. However, there are a few additional options for surviving the storm.
While you may believe you are helping yourself or someone you care about, becoming a cosigner on a loan is not a wise choice, especially in these uncertain times. The truth is that you will be held liable if the borrower defaults on the payments. If it’s your loan, you might not obtain as favorable a rate as you would if you took it out on your own.
Taking on additional debt during a recession is generally not a good decision, with the exception of a home loan, which is used to secure an asset. You should make every effort to pay down your debt as quickly as feasible. Learn to wait and only buy what you require. Things you wish to accomplish should be put off until you have the funds.
While having your mortgage interest rate adjusted to the lower recession interest rates with an adjustable rate mortgage may seem like a smart idea, it’s vital to remember that the minute general interest rates rise, too will your mortgage. Sharp increases in interest rates may damage consumers’ ability to repay mortgage loans to the point that the financial institution has no choice but to reclaim the homes concerned, says Private Property. Its critical to guarantee that you play it safe with a fixed interest rate at times like these.
What is the impact of inflation on the banking sector?
Financing conditions may tighten in inflationary circumstances, raising borrowing prices for some marginal borrowers and affecting bank credit quality and loan growth.
What happens to banks during a downturn?
There is an upsurge in demand for liquidity at the start of a recessionusually across the board. In the face of declining sales, businesses rely on credit to cover their operations, while consumers use credit cards or other forms of credit to make up for the loss of income. At the same time, banks are cutting back on lending, resulting in a decline in supply. They do this to boost reserves in order to offset losses from loan defaults and to meet living expenditures when people’s jobs and other sources of income dry up.
Is bank stock affected by inflation?
Consumers, stocks, and the economy may all suffer as a result of rising inflation. When inflation is high, value stocks perform better, and when inflation is low, growth stocks perform better. When inflation is high, stocks become more volatile.
During a recession, what happens to inflation?
Inflation and deflation are linked to recessions because corporations have surplus goods due to decreasing economic activity, which means fewer demand for goods and services. They’ll decrease prices to compensate for the surplus supply and encourage demand.
What impact did the Great Recession have on banks?
The financial crisis of 2008 had a short-term impact on the banking sector, causing banks to lose money due to mortgage defaults, interbank lending to halt, and consumer and commercial credit to dry up. In the long run, the financial crisis influenced banking by spawning new regulation acts such as Basel III and the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act in the United States.
What impact does the economy have on banks?
When the economy is strong and firms grow, a portion of the extra revenue is returned to banks in the form of capital payments. When the economy is struggling, banking earnings normally fall. In the financial services industry, central bank policy is extremely important.
Why did the financial system collapse in 2008?
In September 2008, Lehman Brothers, one of the world’s largest financial organizations, went bankrupt in a matter of weeks; the value of Britain’s largest corporations was wiped out in a single day; and cash ATMs were rumored to be running out.
When did it begin?
Lehman Brothers declared bankruptcy on September 15, 2008. This is widely regarded as the official start of the economic crisis. There would be no bailout, according to then-President George W. Bush. “Lehman Brothers, one of the world’s oldest, wealthiest, and most powerful investment banks, was not too big to fail,” the Telegraph reports.
What caused the 2008 financial crash?
The financial crisis of 2008 has deep roots, but it wasn’t until September 2008 that the full extent of its consequences became clear to the rest of the globe.
According to Scott Newton, emeritus professor of modern British and international history at the University of Cardiff, the immediate trigger was a combination of speculative activity in financial markets, with a particular focus on property transactions particularly in the United States and Western Europe and the availability of cheap credit.
“A massive amount of money was borrowed to fund what appeared to be a one-way bet on rising property values.” However, the boom was short-lived since, starting around 2005, the gap between income and debt began to expand. This was brought about by growing energy prices on worldwide markets, which resulted in a rise in global inflation.
“Borrowers were squeezed as a result of this trend, with many struggling to repay their mortgages. Property prices have now begun to decrease, causing the value of many banking institutions’ holdings to plummet. The banking sectors of the United States and the United Kingdom were on the verge of collapsing and had to be rescued by government action.”
“Excessive financial liberalisation, backed by a drop in regulation, from the late twentieth century was underpinned by trust in the efficiency of markets,” says Martin Daunton, emeritus professor of economic history at the University of Cambridge.
Where did the crisis start?
“The crash first hit the United States’ banking and financial system, with spillovers throughout Europe,” Daunton adds. “Another crisis emerged here, this time involving sovereign debt, as a result of the eurozone’s defective design, which allowed nations like Greece to borrow on similar conditions to Germany in the expectation that the eurozone would bail out the debtors.
“When the crisis struck, the European Central Bank declined to reschedule or mutualize debt, instead offering a bailout package – on the condition that the afflicted countries implement austerity policies.”
Was the 2008 financial crisis predicted?
Ann Pettifor, a UK-based author and economist, projected an Anglo-American debt-deflationary disaster in 2003 as editor of The Real World Economic Outlook. Following that, The Coming First World Debt Crisis (2006), which became a best-seller following the global financial crisis, was published.
“The crash caught economists and observers off guard since most of them were brought up to regard the free market order as the only workable economic model available,” Newton adds. The demise of the Soviet Union and China’s conversion to capitalism, as well as financial advancements, reinforced this conviction.”
Was the 2008 financial crisis unusual in being so sudden and so unexpected?
“There was a smug notion that crises were a thing of the past, and that there was a ‘great moderation’ – the idea that macroeconomic volatility had diminished over the previous 20 or so years,” says Daunton.
“Inflation and output fluctuation had decreased to half of what it had been in the 1980s, reducing economic uncertainty for individuals and businesses and stabilizing employment.
“In 2004, Ben Bernanke, a Federal Reserve governor who served as chairman from 2006 to 2014, believed that a variety of structural improvements had improved economies’ ability to absorb shocks, and that macroeconomic policy particularly monetary policy had improved inflation control significantly.
“Bernanke did not take into account the financial sector’s instability when congratulating himself on the Fed’s successful management of monetary policy (and nor were most of his fellow economists). Those who believe that an economy is intrinsically prone to shocks, on the other hand, could see the dangers.”
Newton also mentions the 2008 financial crisis “The property crash of the late 1980s and the currency crises of the late 1990s were both more abrupt than the two prior catastrophes of the post-1979 era. This is largely due to the central role that major capitalist governments’ banks play. These institutions lend significant sums of money to one another, as well as to governments, enterprises, and individuals.
“Given the advent of 24-hour and computerized trading, as well as continuous financial sector deregulation, a big financial crisis in capitalist centers as large as the United States and the United Kingdom was bound to spread quickly throughout global markets and banking systems. It was also unavoidable that monetary flows would suddenly stop flowing.”
How closely did the events of 2008 mirror previous economic crises, such as the Wall Street Crash of 1929?
According to Newton, there are certain parallels with 1929 “The most prominent of these are irresponsible speculation, credit reliance, and extremely unequal wealth distribution.
“The Wall Street Crash, on the other hand, spread more slowly over the world than its predecessor in 200708. Currency and banking crises erupted in Europe, Australia, and Latin America, but not until the 1930s or even later. Bank failures occurred in the United States in 193031, but the big banking crisis did not come until late 1932 and early 1933.”
Dr. Linda Yueh, an Oxford University and London Business School economist, adds, “Every crisis is unique, but this one resembled the Great Crash of 1929 in several ways. Both stocks in 1929 and housing in 2008 show the perils of having too much debt in asset markets.”
Daunton draws a distinction between the two crises, saying: “Overconfidence followed by collapse is a common pattern in crises, but the ones in 1929 and 2008 were marked by different fault lines and tensions. In the 1930s, the state was much smaller, which limited its ability to act, and international financial flows were negligible.
“There were also monetary policy discrepancies. Britain and America acquired monetary policy sovereignty by quitting the gold standard in 1931 and 1933. The Germans and the French, on the other hand, stuck to gold, which slowed their comeback.
“In 1929, the postwar settlement impeded international cooperation: Britain resented her debt to the US, while Germany despised having to pay war reparations. Meanwhile, primary producers have been impacted hard by the drop in food and raw material prices, as well as Europe’s move toward self-sufficiency.”
How did politicians and policymakers try to ‘solve’ the 2008 financial crisis?
According to Newton, policymakers initially responded well. “Governments did not employ public spending cuts to reduce debt, following the theories of John Maynard Keynes. Instead, there were small national reflations, which were intended to keep economic activity and employment going while also replenishing bank and corporate balance sheets.
“These packages were complemented by a significant increase in the IMF’s resources to help countries with severe deficits and offset pressures on them to cut back, which may lead to a trade downturn. These actions, taken together, averted a significant worldwide output and employment decline.
“Outside of the United States, these tactics had been largely abandoned in favor of ‘austerity,’ which entails drastic cuts in government spending. Austerity slowed national and international growth, particularly in the United Kingdom and the eurozone. It did not, however, cause a downturn, thanks in large part to China’s huge investment, which consumed 45 percent more cement between 2011 and 2013 than the United States had used in the whole twentieth century.”
Daunton goes on to say: “Quantitative easing was successful in preventing the crisis from being as severe as it was during the Great Depression. The World Trade Organization’s international institutions also played a role in averting a trade war. However, historians may point to frustrations that occurred as a result of the decision to bail out the banking sector, as well as the impact of austerity on the quality of life of residents.”
What were the consequences of the 2008 financial crisis?
In the short term, a massive bailout governments injecting billions into failing banks prevented the financial system from collapsing completely. The crash’s long-term consequences were enormous: lower wages, austerity, and severe political instability. We’re still dealing with the fallout ten years later.