Inflation jumped to 5.4 percent year over year in June, the fastest rate in over 13 years, according to the data. Many people are concerned that large spending packages, such as the multi-trillion-dollar package proposed by the Biden administration and Congressional Democrats, could result in even higher inflation. The proposed bipartisan infrastructure plan was analyzed by Douglas Holtz-Eakin, President of the American Action Forum, and Michael Strain, Director of Economic Policy Studies at the American Enterprise Institute, who concluded that it would not produce an increase in inflation.
Is it true that government expenditure raises inflation?
- The US government produced and spent trillions of dollars to stimulate the economy, resulting in unprecedented inflation.
- Too many dollars are chasing a static supply of products, and the economy is collapsing.
Inflation is a difficult concept to grasp. On a personal level, it causes harm to consumers through no fault of their own. It gives customers poor options, such as spending more money for the same things, changing your consumption basket, or foregoing a purchase. It depletes workers’ salaries and valuable savings. In politics, inflation has damaged candidates, demonstrating that voters are concerned about it. By a 77 to 20 majority, voters in North Carolina rated inflation as a more serious issue than unemployment.
So, what is inflation, exactly? Simply explained, inflation is defined as a general increase in prices and a decrease in the value of money. “Inflation is always and everywhere a monetary phenomenon,” said economist Milton Friedman. It is not a budgetary phenomenon, as it has nothing to do with taxes or government budgets. Inflation, Friedman concluded, “can only be caused by a faster growth in the supply of money than in productivity.”
The current bout of inflation is the result of huge spending: the government spent the equivalent of 27 percent of GDP on “Covid relief” and “stimulus” in 2020 and 2021, the second-largest fiscal reaction as a percentage of GDP of any industrialized country. And the Federal Reserve’s newly produced money was mostly used to fund this spending.
The money supply graph below depicts the tremendous infusion of cash since the outbreak of the pandemic:
The money supply expanded by the same amount in just 21 months, from February 2020 to November 2021, as it did in the roughly 10-year period before it, from July 2011 to February 2020.
Due to the uncertainties surrounding the outbreak of the pandemic, consumers spent less money. Personal consumption, on the other hand, had surpassed pre-pandemic levels by March 2021, continuing long-term trends.
High, simulated demand is being supported by trillions of newly produced currency. Supply is unable to keep up with demand.
The government-mandated corporate shutdown is exacerbating the supply problem. Shutdowns have wreaked havoc on entire industries and caused a drop in the labor force participation rate. The government also raised benefits to those unemployed people who refused to work, prompting some wages to rise even more as businesses competed for workers with a government check in particular industries. Wage gains, on the whole, haven’t kept up with inflation.
While government programs helped some people in need (for example, businesses with Paycheck Protection Program loans), much of the “relief” money was wasted. According to The Heritage Foundation, public health was addressed in less than 10% of the $1.9 trillion “American Rescue Plan” Act for Covid relief.
Consumer and producer prices are now at all-time highs. Wholesale costs have grown 9.7% since last year, according to the most recent data. Consumer prices have increased by 7% in the last year, reaching a 39-year high. CPI hikes of at least 0.5 percent have occurred in six of the last nine months. A growing cost of living is eating away at the value of your dollars.
Government spending in the trillions has resulted in an economy bloated with cheap money. Solutions to inflation are neither quick nor simple due to the significant spending and myriad downstream repercussions of the pandemic’s reactions. The Federal Reserve indicated recently that it expects to raise interest rates three times in 2022 to keep inflation under control. However, with an economy buoyed up and hooked to cheap money, doing so could have a significant negative impact on the economy as a whole. Furthermore, with increased interest rates, servicing the large national debt would become much more expensive.
Unfortunately, White House leaders have provided dubious answers, frequently blaming an undeserving third party. The Biden Administration maintained throughout the end of last year that the “Build Back Better” Act would assist to reduce inflation by making living less expensive for working people at no cost. It was unclear how spending trillions more in freshly minted currency would truly combat inflation.
Another ridiculous approach proposed by the White House is to use antitrust to disarm the large corporations (who were large long before current inflation) that are allegedly responsible for price increases. The Biden administration even blames inflation on port delays and the supply chain crisis. While these supply chain concerns exacerbate an already strained supply, they are not the cause of inflation, which is defined as a general increase in prices rather than a rise in prices in specific industries. These measures are more about furthering Biden’s goal than they are about lowering inflation.
While politicians debate remedies, inflation continues to wreak havoc on American families. Low-wage workers, pensioners, and people on fixed incomes are the ones that suffer the most because they are unable to keep up with inflationary pressures. Inflation has the impact of a hidden tax on them, which they bear the brunt of. Because the majority of their income is already spent on needs, they have limited room to adjust their consumption habits.
America requires leaders who see the true dangers of inflation. Inflation is a small annoyance for the wealthy, but it poses a severe threat to the budgets of the working class and low-income people. Creating inflation indiscriminately to get pet projects through Congress snubs those who are most in need.
What is creating 2021 inflation?
As fractured supply chains combined with increased consumer demand for secondhand vehicles and construction materials, 2021 saw the fastest annual price rise since the early 1980s.
Will the BBB cause inflation to rise?
The recent price increase has rightly concerned Americans, and Senator Manchin has used rising prices a primary justification for his opposition to the enormous Build Back Better Act (BBB). Both feel that the BBB, notably the tax increases, will cause prices to rise even more.
On the other hand, President Biden and others reject the notion that the BBB will raise prices.
As the President stated recently in a press conference:
My Build Back Better plan lowers medicine prices, lowers the cost of elder care, and does it without raising taxes or increasing the deficit on people making less than $400,000 per year. In reality, by increasing employment, my approach reduces the deficit and increases the economy. Bottom line, if price rises are a concern, my Build Back Better strategy is the greatest solution.
So how credible is the President’s counter-argument that the BBB will lower rather than raise prices?
Not at all.
This is why.
Tipp Insights has released a new poll that demonstrates why inflation is causing concern among BBB supporters.
According to Tipp Insights, 86 percent of survey respondents are “somewhat concerned” or “extremely concerned” about inflation in the coming year.
Inflation is a legitimate concern for Americans.
According to the survey’s authors:
Americans are spending 50% more for gasoline, 29% more for energy, and 24% more for natural gas than they were a year ago. Officially, food costs have risen by 6.5 percent, but analysts believe it is more likely to be in the double digits.
While incomes have increased by 4.7 percent in the last year, the 7 percent increase in consumer prices has fully cancelled out those gains.
Workers now are literally worse off than they were a year ago due to inflation.
Senator Machin frequently mentioned rising prices as the crux of his opposition to the BBB in statements to reporters yesterday.
CNN’s Manu Raju recounted the Senator’s remarks in a series of tweets:
I just got off the phone with Manchin, who set a high bar for passing ‘chunks’ of the Build Back Better plan. In other words, he wants to deal with inflation, covid, and the national debt first. He also stated that they will be’starting from scratch,’ and that his December offer will not be considered.
“The most important thing we have to do is deal with inflation,” Manchin stated. “Make sure your finances are in order. Get a working tax code in place, and deal with the pharmaceutical companies that are ripping people off with exorbitant pricing. That’s something we can fix. We have a lot of potential.”
Manchin went on to say that Washington must first address the issue of immigration “Organize your financial affairs. Reduce the rate of inflation. Get out of the way, Covid. Then we’ll be on our way… “We’ll have to start from the beginning,” Manchin remarked, adding that it will be difficult “I need a fresh sheet of paper.”
Inflation is a problem that both Americans and Senator Manchin think needs to be addressed.
Would the BBB, as the President claims, assist in price reduction?
No.
This is why.
Prices rise or fall in response to tax hikes, depending on what you’re taxing.
A wage tax, for example, would cause prices to fall since it would lower demand in the economy.
The BBB, on the other hand, almost entirely raises taxes on business revenue.
The $800 billion in corporate and international tax increases, as well as the majority of the taxes aimed at individuals, fall solely on the business sector “Individuals with a High Net Worth.”
According to a recent EY study, 81 percent of the three “Pass-through businesses will bear the brunt of the BBB’s “individual” tax hikes:
So, out of the total $1.45 trillion in tax increases in the BBB, $1.3 trillion goes to businesses.
These tax increases will result in lower employment and output, as well as increased pricing for families.
The impact could be significant in an economy where supply is already severely constrained.
Voters understand this relationship, as our Winston Group survey from last summer indicated.
Almost two-thirds of respondents thought that business taxes will be passed on to consumers in the form of higher pricing.
The President’s claim that the BBB will lower costs is based on a superficial examination of the law that ignores the whole impact of the $2 trillion spending and tax package.
A recent report by the Joint Economic Committee’s majority members is a nice illustration. The BBB, according to the research, will assist families in better affording childcare, college, and other expenses:
The Build Back Better Act will decrease taxes for families with children while lowering healthcare and prescription medication expenditures (with Medicare negotiating lower drug pricing for seniors). Millions of Americans would save money on gas, commute costs would be more predictable, and child care costs would be drastically reduced, especially for new parents.
Subsidizing specific costs, however, is not the same as lowering prices.
While many of these subsidies may benefit individuals who get them, they are likely to raise prices for everyone else.
Allowing Medicare to set prices, for example, would undoubtedly help Medicare beneficiaries save money on prescription drugs.
However, drug prices for everyone else are anticipated to rise, therefore the policy’s overall impact on prices remains unknown.
When it comes to the report’s statements concerning the bill’s childcare subsidies, the same analysis applies. Providing childcare benefits without a corresponding increase in the supply of childcare services will benefit the families who get the benefits, but it will also raise total childcare prices.
The increased Child Tax Credit under the plan would benefit families, but it would also lower employment and productivity.
In August, the Tax Foundation used its General Equilibrium Model to estimate that the credit would result in the loss of 38,000 full-time equivalent jobs.
Prices would rise if demand increased while output decreased, not the other way around.
In November, the National Association of Business Economists sponsored a panel debate in which these issues were thoroughly examined.
According to Bloomberg,
If Congress passes the roughly $2 trillion tax and spending measure championed by President Joe Biden, inflation will rise next year.
That’s according to three top economists who spoke on a virtual panel sponsored by the National Association for Business Economics on Wednesday: Mark Zandi of Moody’s Analytics, Douglas Holtz-Eakin of the American Action Forum, and Harvard University professor Doug Elmendorf.
While they all agreed that the plan as written would increase inflationary pressures in the short term, they disagreed on how concerning this would be, with Zandi being the least concerned and Holtz-Eakin being the most concerned.
The BBB would levy new taxes on businesses totaling more than $1.3 trillion, with much of the money going to workers in the form of checks and subsidies.
In simple words, it would levy a tax on produce while subsidizing consumption.
Senator Manchin is correct in his assessment that the outcome will raise costs.
That’s not a good idea at a time when prices are already rising and supply lines are already stretched.
What makes infrastructure such an effective inflation hedge?
Because of its monopolistic pricing power, good regulatory regimes, and little operational cost vulnerability, infrastructure is frequently regarded as a natural inflation hedge. In contrast to this widely held but unproven belief, the authors find that listed infrastructure hedges inflation just as well (or worse) as other equities. Only infrastructure firm portfolios with high pricing power have good inflation hedging properties over a five-year investment horizon, slightly outperforming equities. The authors use a huge dataset of 824 infrastructure enterprises across 46 nations and 37 years, as well as a robust regression model that corrects for overlapping data and spatial correlation, to deliver more robust insights than earlier empirical investigations.
Are greater taxes associated with lower inflation?
In fact, the supply-side model’s output effect could be so large that inflation rates decline. Traditional models, on the other hand, always show that a tax cut raises inflation. In a nutshell, the supply-side argument argues that fewer taxes, more productivity, and maybe lower inflation are all good things.
What effect does consumer spending have on inflation?
- Inflation is the rate at which the price of goods and services in a given economy rises.
- Inflation occurs when prices rise as manufacturing expenses, such as raw materials and wages, rise.
- Inflation can result from an increase in demand for products and services, as people are ready to pay more for them.
- Some businesses benefit from inflation if they are able to charge higher prices for their products as a result of increased demand.
What generates inflation when the government spends?
According to the new idea, inflation occurs when the total amount of government debt exceeds what individuals expect the government to repay. The cost of everything rises, but the value of the dollar falls.
How do governments inflate the economy?
4. Expectations of higher inflation
It is difficult to reduce inflation once it has begun. Greater prices, for example, will lead to workers demanding higher pay, resulting in a wage-price cycle. As a result, inflation expectations are crucial. It is self-fulfilling when individuals expect big inflation. When expectations are low, transitory price increases are more likely to be fleeting and go away.
5. Increasing the money supply
Inflation would be expected to rise if the Central Bank printed more money. This is because the money supply has a significant impact on price determination. Prices will rise if there is more money pursuing the same number of products. Hyperinflation is frequently brought on by a rapid expansion of the money supply.
It is possible to expand the money supply without creating inflation in extreme conditions, such as a liquidity trap or a recession. This is because, during a recession, an increase in the money supply may simply be conserved; for example, banks may not expand lending but instead hold more bank reserves.
6. Increased taxation
If the government raises taxes, such as VAT and Excise duty, prices would rise, and the CPI will rise as a result. These tax hikes, however, are likely to be one-time events. There’s even an inflation metric (CPI-CT) that ignores the impact of transitory tax increases and cutbacks.
7. Productivity decline
When businesses become less productive and allow costs to rise, the result is always greater pricing.
8. Profits drive up inflation
When businesses raise prices in order to achieve higher inflation rates. This is more likely to happen during periods of rapid economic expansion.
9. Fiscal and monetary policy
The monetary authorities’ attitude is crucial; for example, if there was an increase in AD and the monetary authorities responded by raising the money supply, the price level would rise.
What is the current rate of inflation in 2022?
Inflation in the United States was substantially overestimated by forecasters in 2021. The initial spike in inflation was greeted with hope. Most analysts predicted that supply chain disruptions due by the epidemic would be brief, and that inflation would not endure or climb further. People were confident that inflation would not become self-perpetuating after three decades of low and stable inflation.
Between February and August 2021, projections suggested that inflation will grow in 2021, but then fall to significantly lower levels in 2022, with personal consumption expenditures inflation near to the Federal Reserve’s 2% objective.
However, data from the last few months has shattered that optimism. Inflation was previously restricted to product categories with obvious supply shocks, but it is now widespread, with anecdotal evidence of earnings pursuing higher prices and prices adjusting for increasing expenses. Forecasters had lowered inflation predictions for 2022 to 3.1 percent by February 2022. Energy price shocks from Russian sanctions will almost certainly lead to more higher revisions.
When it comes to effectively forecasting future inflation, the stakes are considerable. This is crucial for assessing how quickly monetary policy should return to a neutral position in order to prevent a scenario of sustained inflation, which would necessitate further tightening in the future and risk another recession.