Is Inflation A Monetary Phenomenon?

What exactly is a monetary phenomenon?

Inflation, on the other hand, is a monetary phenomena characterized by an increase in the price of products expressed in terms of money, and it necessitates a monetary growth rate greater than the rate of real growth. The above observations also have important implications for anti-inflationary policy.

Is it monetary or fiscal inflation?

As the US economy has slowly recovered from the Great Recession in recent years, a mystery has emerged: where has all the inflation gone? Inflation in the United States remains stubbornly below the Federal Reserve’s goal rate of 2%, despite a record low jobless rate and historically low interest rates. A similar conundrum arose during the Great Recession: What happened to the deflation? Inflation fell slightly, but the deflationary spiral that many feared would emerge once interest rates reached zero did not materialize.

According to John H. Cochrane, a senior scholar at the Hoover Institution and distinguished senior fellow at Chicago Booth, there is an explanation for this that defies traditional economics. Standard economic theory has long claimed that inflation is entirely controlled by monetary policy, but that it has little to do with fiscal policy outside of extreme hyperinflations. According to Cochrane and other economists who have worked on the fiscal theory of the price level (FTPL) for the past 30 years, this orthodoxy is incorrect. Fiscal policy, according to this idea, is a significant driver of inflation.

Cochrane investigates what drove US inflation between 1947 and 2018 using statistics on inflation, monetary and fiscal policy, and economic factors. On the basis of the economic principle that the real value of government debt must be equal to the real present value of primary surpluses that the government is projected to run in the future to pay back the debt, his theory relates inflation to the real value of government debt. (Primary surpluses are the difference between tax receipts and government spending, minus interest payments.)

The Federal Reserve’s interest-rate policy, according to conventional wisdom, totally influences price levels and inflation. Even if deflation raises the value of the debt, Congress and the Treasury are expected to raise or cut taxes and expenditure as needed to pay it off. The real worth of government debt, on the other hand, drives prices in the FTPL, much like the present value of future dividends determines a stock price.

Compare the amount of outstanding debt with the present value of future surplusesand with the discount rate, or return that holders of government debt require, according to Cochrane. Unexpected inflation indicates that investors believe the government will not be able to service its debt due to a lack of surpluses, or that they require a greater return to keep debt. They try to sell government bonds in either event, driving up the price of everything else.

The data revealed a long-standing historical correlation that FTPL experts had been perplexed by: a lower rate of inflation during recessions. Deficits in the United States, for example, grew considerably during the Great Recession as a result of lower tax receipts and greater expenditure, particularly on stimulus and bailouts. Expectations for future surpluses have also dropped. Inflation, on the other hand, fell as investors sought out stable assets like government bonds. Why? Because interest rates have fallen. In the name of safety, investors were ready to hold government bonds and even sold less of everything else to buy them, despite the low yields. A low discount rate translates to a higher real value, which necessitates less inflation.

The discount rate is the most important driver of stock prices, according to research, and the discount rate has also had a key influence in US inflation, according to Cochrane. Unexpected inflation has historically been linked to increases in real interest rates, which reduce the value of debt, and vice versarather than changes in expected surpluses.

Is India’s inflation a monetary phenomenon?

Abstract. Some economists and policymakers argue that “inflation is always a monetary phenomenon,” and that the best strategy to stop growing inflation is to reduce the money supply in the economy.

What is inflation and what causes it?

In economics, inflation is defined as a gradual increase in the price of goods and services in a given economy. When the general price level rises, each unit of currency buys less products and services; as a result, inflation equals a loss of money’s purchasing power. Deflation is the polar opposite of inflation, which is defined as a prolonged drop in the overall price level of goods and services. The inflation rate, which is the annualised percentage change in a general price index, is a typical metric of inflation.

Not all prices will rise at the same time. An example of the index number problem is assigning a representative value to a group of prices. In the United States, the employment cost index is used for wages, whereas the consumer price index is used for prices. A shift in the standard of living is defined as a difference in consumer prices and wages.

The origins of inflation have been extensively debated (see below), with the general opinion being that a rise in the money supply, combined with an increase in the velocity of money, is the most common causal element.

Inflation would have no influence on the real economy if money were totally neutral; nevertheless, perfect neutrality is not widely believed. In the case of exceptionally high inflation and hyperinflation, the effects on the real economy are severe. Inflation that is more moderate has both beneficial and negative effects on economies. The negative implications include an increase in the opportunity cost of keeping money, uncertainty about future inflation, which may discourage investment and savings, and, if inflation is quick enough, shortages of products as customers stockpile in anticipation of future price increases. Positive consequences include reduced unemployment due to nominal wage rigidity, more flexibility for the central bank in implementing monetary policy, encouraging loans and investment rather than money hoarding, and avoiding the inefficiencies of deflation.

Most economists today advocate for a low and stable rate of inflation. Low inflation (as opposed to zero or negative inflation) lessens the severity of economic downturns by allowing the labor market to respond more quickly during a downturn, as well as reducing the possibility of a liquidity trap preventing monetary policy from stabilizing the economy. The duty of maintaining a low and stable rate of inflation is usually delegated to monetary authorities. These monetary authorities, in general, are central banks that control monetary policy by establishing interest rates, conducting open market operations, and (less frequently) modifying commercial bank reserve requirements.

When economists say inflation is a monetary phenomenon, what exactly do they mean?

When economists refer to inflation as a monetary phenomenon, they are referring to a price level that is constantly and rapidly growing.

What does it mean that inflation is a monetary phenomenon everywhere and at all times?

“Inflation is always and everywhere a monetary event,” means that a large increase in central bank money can cause inflation or change deflation into inflation.

What impact does inflation have on monetary policy?

As the rate of inflation rises, the Fed follows this rule and raises the interest rate. The monetary policy rule explains how the Fed responds to changes in inflation rates by adjusting real interest rates. The monetary authority aims for a higher real interest rate as inflation rises.

Inflation is caused by fiscal or monetary policy.

  • The proper reaction of monetary and fiscal policy to economic conditions is determined by the balance of supply and demand in commodities and services markets as well as capital markets.
  • When mood is negative, monetary policy can try to promote activity in goods and services markets by lowering the cost of capital, but this is ineffectual.
  • Fiscal policy can encourage activity in the goods and services sectors directly, but this can lead to inflation and market distortions.
  • While monetary policy is unlikely to produce inflation as long as debt demand stays low, a shift in fiscal policy might bring low interest rates to an end.