Is Inflation Good For An Economy?

Inflation is and has been a contentious topic in economics. Even the term “inflation” has diverse connotations depending on the situation. Many economists, businesspeople, and politicians believe that mild inflation is necessary to stimulate consumer spending, presuming that higher levels of expenditure are necessary for economic progress.

How Can Inflation Be Good For The Economy?

The Federal Reserve usually sets an annual rate of inflation for the United States, believing that a gradually rising price level makes businesses successful and stops customers from waiting for lower costs before buying. In fact, some people argue that the primary purpose of inflation is to avert deflation.

Others, on the other hand, feel that inflation is little, if not a net negative on the economy. Rising costs make saving more difficult, forcing people to pursue riskier investing techniques in order to grow or keep their wealth. Some argue that inflation enriches some businesses or individuals while hurting the majority.

The Federal Reserve aims for 2% annual inflation, thinking that gradual price rises help businesses stay profitable.

Understanding Inflation

The term “inflation” is frequently used to characterize the economic impact of rising oil or food prices. If the price of oil rises from $75 to $100 per barrel, for example, input prices for firms would rise, as will transportation expenses for everyone. As a result, many other prices may rise as well.

Most economists, however, believe that the actual meaning of inflation is slightly different. Inflation is a result of the supply and demand for money, which means that generating more dollars reduces the value of each dollar, causing the overall price level to rise.

Key Takeaways

  • Inflation, according to economists, occurs when the supply of money exceeds the demand for it.
  • When inflation helps to raise consumer demand and consumption, which drives economic growth, it is considered as a positive.
  • Some people believe inflation is necessary to prevent deflation, while others say it is a drag on the economy.
  • Some inflation, according to John Maynard Keynes, helps to avoid the Paradox of Thrift, or postponed consumption.

When Inflation Is Good

When the economy isn’t operating at full capacity, which means there’s unsold labor or resources, inflation can theoretically assist boost output. More money means higher spending, which corresponds to more aggregated demand. As a result of increased demand, more production is required to supply that need.

To avoid the Paradox of Thrift, British economist John Maynard Keynes argued that some inflation was required. According to this theory, if consumer prices are allowed to decline steadily as a result of the country’s increased productivity, consumers learn to postpone purchases in order to get a better deal. This paradox has the net effect of lowering aggregate demand, resulting in lower production, layoffs, and a faltering economy.

Inflation also helps borrowers by allowing them to repay their loans with less valuable money than they borrowed. This fosters borrowing and lending, which boosts expenditure across the board. The fact that the United States is the world’s greatest debtor, and inflation serves to ease the shock of its vast debt, is perhaps most crucial to the Federal Reserve.

Economists used to believe that inflation and unemployment had an inverse connection, and that rising unemployment could be combated by increasing inflation. The renowned Phillips curve defined this relationship. When the United States faced stagflation in the 1970s, the Phillips curve was severely discredited.

What effect does inflation have on the economy?

  • Inflation, or the gradual increase in the price of goods and services over time, has a variety of positive and negative consequences.
  • Inflation reduces purchasing power, or the amount of something that can be bought with money.
  • Because inflation reduces the purchasing power of currency, customers are encouraged to spend and store up on products that depreciate more slowly.

Inflation benefits who?

Inflation Benefits Whom? While inflation provides minimal benefit to consumers, it can provide a boost to investors who hold assets in inflation-affected countries. If energy costs rise, for example, investors who own stock in energy businesses may see their stock values climb as well.

Is inflation beneficial or detrimental to stocks?

Consumers, stocks, and the economy may all suffer as a result of rising inflation. When inflation is high, value stocks perform better, and when inflation is low, growth stocks perform better. When inflation is high, stocks become more volatile.

What is the extent of inflation?

Year-on-year inflation rates have reached their greatest levels in over three decades as the global economy recovers from the COVID-19 epidemic. Is this higher inflation just a blip on the radar, or is it here to stay? Patricia Sanchez Juanino, Corrado Macchiarelli, and Barry Naisbitt explore US inflation possibilities for the next 18 months to answer these questions. They believe that inflation will peak at 5% in the coming months and then remain close to 4% in the near term: this may happen if, for example, inflation expectations continue to rise.

The 12-month CPI inflation rate in the United States reached its highest level since 1990 in October 2021, at 6.2 percent year-on-year. Pent-up demand and rising energy prices have been primary drivers of the increase, but supply chain constraints and spikes in other commodity prices have also played a role. A crucial policy question is whether the current rise in US inflation is only temporary, as it was in 2008, or if it signals the start of a longer era of inflation above the 2% objective, like it did in the 1970s and early 1980s.

The Federal Reserve has revised up its annual inflation predictions for both this year and next year as the year has progressed. The September median prediction for year-on-year PCE (household consumption) inflation in the fourth quarter increased to 4.2 percent this year and 2.2 percent next year. Both forecasts are higher than those issued in March: 2.4 percent in 2021 and 2% in 2022. Despite the fact that predictions have risen, Federal Reserve policymakers still expect inflation to decline considerably next year. The Federal Open Markets Committee (the group that decides on the right monetary policy stance) stated in November that it will cut its monthly purchases of Treasury securities and mortgage-backed securities, a policy known as tapering. However, it continued to emphasize that the spike in inflation, as reflected in its inflation estimates, was primarily transitory.

While we anticipate a reduction in inflationary pressure, we are concerned that the reduction will be insufficient. Annual US PCE inflation would grow from 1.2 percent in the fourth quarter of last year to 5.1 percent this year, then decline to 2.3 percent in the fourth quarter of 2022, according to the National Institute’s Autumn 2021 Global Economic Outlook. However, we believe that the risks are skewed to the upside, and that if they materialize, the Federal Reserve will be forced to tighten monetary policy sooner than it appears to be planning.

Inflation scenarios for 2022-23

To demonstrate the dangers, we employ Huw Dixon’s technique from Cardiff University, which allows us to make stylized assumptions about future monthly price fluctuations in order to generate various annual inflation routes over the next 18 months. Three scenarios are examined (rather than forecasts).

In the best-case scenario, monthly inflation reduces steadily until it reaches its average level for the five years prior to the pandemic in June of the following year, and then stays there. After that, the monthly price changes are converted into year-over-year inflation. On this measure, annual PCE inflation would decline to 2.1 percent in the fourth quarter of next year, roughly in line with the Federal Reserve’s consensus forecast.

We look at two other scenarios that are much less reassuring. We assume that the extent of monthly price increases decreases, but not as quickly or as far as before the pandemic, so that it reaches twice the pre-pandemic period average in June. In this instance, annual PCE inflation in the fourth quarter of next year would be 3.2 percent.

Finally, if monthly PCE inflation stays at its current level (0.3 percent) for the rest of the year, annual inflation in the fourth quarter of next year will be 3.9 percent. Figure 1 depicts the year-on-year inflation projected lines for several scenarios.

Figure 1: Year-over-year PCE inflation projections based on stylized monthly assumptions (percent)

The most intriguing aspect of these scenarios is that they all hint to annual inflation being near 5% in the next months. Figure 1 shows that, despite monthly inflation returning to the 2015-2019 average by next June, year-on-year inflation continues to rise over the following few months, reaching 5%, as lower monthly rises in 2020 are replaced by greater monthly increases this year. In the best-case scenario, annual inflation returns to 2% by the end of next year. If monthly inflation stays at 0.3 percent, year-over-year inflation will remain persistently close to 4%.

These are simply projections based on stylized assumptions, not forecasts or a deep examination of the underlying reasons influencing recent and future monthly price fluctuations. They are broadly consistent with the idea that annual inflation risks will remain strong through 2022, even if recent price hikes owing to supply chain disconnections fade away over time. If policies do not prevent inflation expectations from rising, the situation may worsen.

With its new mandate and a strong focus on maximum employment, the Federal Reserve expects a temporary (or, in today’s lingo, transitory) overshoot of inflation above its target, especially when it follows a long period of undershooting. If inflation expectations become skewed and wage-push inflation forces increase, a temporary overshoot could turn into a long-term one.

Higher inflation may be here to stay

According to our forecasts, the current rate of inflation could return to its target rate by the end of 2022. However, it appears that inflation will continue to exceed the objective for some years. If inflation reaches 5%, the Federal Reserve will need to significantly up its policy messaging, arguing that the spike is just temporary and convincing families, businesses, and financial markets that monthly inflation will soon revert to lower levels. If the current supply-chain disruption and global energy price increases end, its arguments will be strengthened.

The Federal Reserve has yet to clarify the timeframe of ending quantitative easing, reversing it, and subsequently raising policy interest rates. For example, an unexpected policy reversal to protect central bank credibility could cause a quick financial market slump and public sector balance sheet imbalances. How central banks respond to increasing inflation, through a mix of terminating quantitative easing and raising policy rates, will determine bond prices.

Inflation expectations are rising, and the Federal Reserve needs to create contingency plans for its actions if a 5% inflation rate appears to be embedded. If it lifts its inflation predictions again after its December meeting, as we expect, such contingency measures may be required sooner rather than later. Given the uncertainty about the duration of higher inflation, wages, and an employment rate that remains below pre-pandemic levels, we believe the Federal Reserve will be cautious in tightening policy, especially because it will have to choose between stabilizing below-target employment and stabilizing above-target inflation. Moving too far, too fast, risks squandering the best chance it has to avoid near-deflationary traps with interest rates at their lowest levels. They are likely to pay the price if it is a time of significantly above-target inflation.

  • “US inflation peaking soon?” in National Institute of Economic and Social Research (Box A), Global Economic Outlook, Series B., No. 4, Autumn, pp. 24-30, is the basis for this article. ‘Global Economic Outlook’, Series B, No. 4, Autumn, NIESR (2021).

Who is the most affected by inflation?

According to a new research released Monday by the Joint Economic Committee Republicans, American consumers are dealing with the highest inflation rate in more than three decades, and the rise in the price of basic products is disproportionately harming low-income people.

Higher inflation, which erodes individual purchasing power, is especially devastating to low- and middle-income Americans, according to the study. According to studies from the Federal Reserve Banks of Cleveland and New York, inflation affects impoverished people’s lifetime spending opportunities more than their wealthier counterparts, owing to rising gasoline prices.

“Inflation affects the quality of life for poor Americans, and rising gas prices raise the cost of living for poor Americans living in rural regions far more than for affluent Americans,” according to the JEC report.

What is creating 2021 inflation?

As fractured supply chains combined with increased consumer demand for secondhand vehicles and construction materials, 2021 saw the fastest annual price rise since the early 1980s.

When inflation occurs, who suffers the most?

Unexpected inflation hurts lenders since the money they are paid back has less purchasing power than the money they lent out. Unexpected inflation benefits borrowers since the money they repay is worth less than the money they borrowed.

Is inflation beneficial to gold?

Gold is a proven long-term inflation hedge, but its short-term performance is less impressive. Despite this, our research demonstrates that gold can be an important part of an inflation-hedging portfolio.

Is inflation beneficial to technology stocks?

High-growth equities have struggled throughout 2021 and this amazing start to 2022, owing to fears that the Fed may raise interest rates to battle inflation, putting pressure on their valuations. Professor Vittorio de Pedys criticizes all three pillars of the mainstream argument in this contribution based on his impact paper.

The Fed is unquestionably behind the curve when it comes to dealing with inflation. The M2 money supply indicator, which increased by 40% from 2019 to 2021, is a clear indicator of price pressure. Today’s supply chain bottlenecks are the outcome of economic limitations being countered with a significant shift in demand for products vs services, rather than a global economy unraveling. Companies are addressing this issue by re-engineering their supply chains and constructing factories (see Intel, Taiwan semiconductors). The IHS Markit PMI indices in emerging markets have all recently increased considerably, indicating that manufacturing capacity is improving. Money’s velocity is decreasing: because to productivity-enhancing technology, businesses are spending money less fast. Prices will continue to fall as a result of this secular trend. Finally, comparisons will be easier: inflation will be recorded in the second quarter of 2022 versus the substantially higher numbers witnessed throughout 2021. In 2022, tougher comps will inevitably hold down headline inflation. Market data backs up this assertion: the 5×5 years forward-forward in Libor/inflation swaps, a leading indication of market expectations, indicates that market dealers estimate inflation to be 2.5 percent in five years.

Fed funds rates will aim 2.5 percent in 2024 under the most extreme scenario. It’s hardly a frightening figure. Given the high quantity of business and student debt and its low quality, if the Fed hikes rates above the inflation peak, it risks halting the economic growth and unleashing a cascade of bankruptcies, resulting in an economic crisis. The cost of government debt servicing might soar, pushing out other, more vital public spending. On the other hand, if the Fed decides to maintain its current policy, its dovish posture will further fuel inflationary expectations. As a result, the inflate or die trap appears to be the best option. A strong US dollar will also assist in the long run. Because the real rate is minus 5.5 percent, the government can sit back and watch its mountain of debt (now at 136 percent of GDP) shrink. When looking at Fed Funds Future deliveries for the end of 2022 on the CBOT, the market is pricing a 0.874 percent O/N rate one year from now with three rate hikes. A similar message can be found in the EuroDollar Futures, with the expected 3-months rate for June 2024 trading at an unimpressive 1.37 percent. Chairman Jerome Powell is no Paul Volcker, so the Fed will put on a hawkish mask to gain time, then back down as inflation starts to fall in the second half of 2022.

According to Vittorio de Pedys, 2022 will be a stronger year than 2021 since rate hikes are beneficial to hypergrowth stocks. It’s the “roaring technological twenties”!

Since their all-time high in March 2021, high-growth technology stocks have been steadily declining. According to this logic, the higher the interest rate, the higher the discount rate employed in valuation models such as DCF and CAPM, and the lower the value of a growth stock. Higher inflation, on the other hand, has not historically sunk markets. Rates that are higher do. To destroy growth stocks, substantially higher rates than those proposed by the Fed will be required. Even if most people are unhappy, the economy is essentially in good shape. SPACs, Reddit investors, “meme” stocks, cryptocurrencies, and IPOs are all showing signs of froth. In terms of rates, the “danger” zone begins at 5%. According to studies, there has never been a recession with a rate of less than 4%. Over any 19-year period, US stocks have outpaced inflation 100% of the time, according to Goldman Sachs. The market is telling us that the Fed raised rates eight times between 2016 and 2018, and that growth companies prospered throughout that time: just look at Cathie Wood’s flagship ARK Innovation ETF (ARKK), which soared 90 percent during that time. Growth stocks are damaged by the worry of rising interest rates: the pain is limited to the prospect of higher rates. Once this occurs, these equities benefit because their greater growth potential is accurately valued above a minor multiple compression due to somewhat higher discount rates. The adoption of technology by a larger number of people is unstoppable. Hypergrowth stocks are at the heart of these factors, and they will gain from a strengthening economy.

Where should I place my money to account for inflation?

“While cash isn’t a growth asset, it will typically stay up with inflation in nominal terms if inflation is accompanied by rising short-term interest rates,” she continues.

CFP and founder of Dare to Dream Financial Planning Anna N’Jie-Konte agrees. With the epidemic demonstrating how volatile the economy can be, N’Jie-Konte advises maintaining some money in a high-yield savings account, money market account, or CD at all times.

“Having too much wealth is an underappreciated risk to one’s financial well-being,” she adds. N’Jie-Konte advises single-income households to lay up six to nine months of cash, and two-income households to set aside six months of cash.

Lassus recommends that you keep your short-term CDs until we have a better idea of what longer-term inflation might look like.