- The Great Recession, which ran from December 2007 to June 2009, was one of the worst economic downturns in US history.
- The economic crisis was precipitated by the collapse of the housing market, which was fueled by low interest rates, cheap lending, poor regulation, and hazardous subprime mortgages.
- New financial laws and an aggressive Federal Reserve are two of the Great Recession’s legacies.
What were some of the most significant consequences of the recession from 2007 to 2009?
The unemployment rate during the December 2007June 2009 recession was higher than during any previous recession in recent decades. For example, 47 months after the beginning of the recession in November 1973, employment was more than 7% higher than it had been before the recession began. In contrast, employment was still almost 4% lower 47 months after the start of the most current recession (November 2011).
What were the consequences of the Great Recession of 2007?
When the decade-long expansion in US housing market activity peaked in 2006, the Great Moderation came to an end, and residential development began to decline. Losses on mortgage-related financial assets began to burden global financial markets in 2007, and the US economy entered a recession in December 2007. Several prominent financial firms were in financial difficulties that year, and several financial markets were undergoing substantial upheaval. The Federal Reserve responded by providing liquidity and support through a variety of measures aimed at improving the functioning of financial markets and institutions and, as a result, limiting the damage to the US economy. 1 Nonetheless, the economic downturn deteriorated in the fall of 2008, eventually becoming severe and long enough to be dubbed “the Great Recession.” While the US economy reached bottom in the middle of 2009, the recovery in the years that followed was exceptionally slow in certain ways. In response to the severity of the downturn and the slow pace of recovery that followed, the Federal Reserve provided unprecedented monetary accommodation. Furthermore, the financial crisis prompted a slew of important banking and financial regulation reforms, as well as congressional legislation that had a substantial impact on the Federal Reserve.
Rise and Fall of the Housing Market
Following a long period of expansion in US house building, home prices, and housing loans, the recession and crisis struck. This boom began in the 1990s and accelerated in the mid-2000s, continuing unabated through the 2001 recession. Between 1998 and 2006, average home prices in the United States more than doubled, the largest increase in US history, with even bigger advances in other locations. During this time, home ownership increased from 64 percent in 1994 to 69 percent in 2005, while residential investment increased from around 4.5 percent of US GDP to nearly 6.5 percent. Employment in housing-related sectors contributed for almost 40% of net private sector job creation between 2001 and 2005.
The development of the housing market was accompanied by an increase in household mortgage borrowing in the United States. Household debt in the United States increased from 61 percent of GDP in 1998 to 97 percent in 2006. The rise in home mortgage debt appears to have been fueled by a number of causes. The Federal Open Market Committee (FOMC) maintained a low federal funds rate after the 2001 recession, and some observers believe that by keeping interest rates low for a “long period” and only gradually increasing them after 2004, the Federal Reserve contributed to the expansion of housing market activity (Taylor 2007). Other researchers, on the other hand, believe that such variables can only explain for a small part of the rise in housing activity (Bernanke 2010). Furthermore, historically low interest rates may have been influenced by significant savings accumulations in some developing market economies, which acted to keep interest rates low globally (Bernanke 2005). Others attribute the surge in borrowing to the expansion of the mortgage-backed securities market. Borrowers who were deemed a bad credit risk in the past, maybe due to a poor credit history or an unwillingness to make a big down payment, found it difficult to get mortgages. However, during the early and mid-2000s, lenders offered high-risk, or “subprime,” mortgages, which were bundled into securities. As a result, there was a significant increase in access to housing financing, which helped to drive the ensuing surge in demand that drove up home prices across the country.
Effects on the Financial Sector
The extent to which home prices might eventually fall became a significant question for the pricing of mortgage-related securities after they peaked in early 2007, according to the Federal Housing Finance Agency House Price Index, because large declines in home prices were viewed as likely to lead to an increase in mortgage defaults and higher losses to holders of such securities. Large, nationwide drops in home prices were uncommon in US historical data, but the run-up in home prices was unique in terms of magnitude and extent. Between the first quarter of 2007 and the second quarter of 2011, property values declined by more than a fifth on average across the country. As financial market participants faced significant uncertainty regarding the frequency of losses on mortgage-related assets, this drop in home values contributed to the financial crisis of 2007-08. Money market investors became concerned of subprime mortgage exposures in August 2007, putting pressure on certain financial markets, particularly the market for asset-backed commercial paper (Covitz, Liang, and Suarez 2009). The investment bank Bear Stearns was bought by JPMorgan Chase with the help of the Federal Reserve in the spring of 2008. Lehman Brothers declared bankruptcy in September, and the Federal Reserve aided AIG, a significant insurance and financial services firm, the next day. The Federal Reserve, the Treasury, and the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation were all approached by Citigroup and Bank of America for assistance.
The Federal Reserve’s assistance to specific financial firms was hardly the only instance of central bank credit expansion in reaction to the crisis. The Federal Reserve also launched a slew of new lending programs to help a variety of financial institutions and markets. A credit facility for “primary dealers,” the broker-dealers that act as counterparties to the Fed’s open market operations, as well as lending programs for money market mutual funds and the commercial paper market, were among them. The Term Asset-Backed Securities Loan Facility (TALF), which was launched in collaboration with the US Department of Treasury, was aimed to relieve credit conditions for families and enterprises by offering credit to US holders of high-quality asset-backed securities.
To avoid an increase in bank reserves that would drive the federal funds rate below its objective as banks attempted to lend out their excess reserves, the Federal Reserve initially funded the expansion of Federal Reserve credit by selling Treasury securities. The Federal Reserve, on the other hand, got the right to pay banks interest on their excess reserves in October 2008. This encouraged banks to keep their reserves rather than lending them out, reducing the need for the Federal Reserve to offset its increased lending with asset reductions.2
Effects on the Broader Economy
The housing industry was at the forefront of not only the financial crisis, but also the broader economic downturn. Residential construction jobs peaked in 2006, as did residential investment. The total economy peaked in December 2007, the start of the recession, according to the National Bureau of Economic Research. The drop in general economic activity was slow at first, but it accelerated in the fall of 2008 when financial market stress reached a peak. The US GDP plummeted by 4.3 percent from peak to trough, making this the greatest recession since World War II. It was also the most time-consuming, spanning eighteen months. From less than 5% to 10%, the jobless rate has more than doubled.
The FOMC cut its federal funds rate objective from 4.5 percent at the end of 2007 to 2 percent at the start of September 2008 in response to worsening economic conditions. The FOMC hastened its interest rate decreases as the financial crisis and economic contraction worsened in the fall of 2008, bringing the rate to its effective floor a target range of 0 to 25 basis points by the end of the year. The Federal Reserve also launched the first of several large-scale asset purchase (LSAP) programs in November 2008, purchasing mortgage-backed assets and longer-term Treasury securities. These purchases were made with the goal of lowering long-term interest rates and improving financial conditions in general, hence boosting economic activity (Bernanke 2012).
Although the recession ended in June 2009, the economy remained poor. Economic growth was relatively mild in the first four years of the recovery, averaging around 2%, and unemployment, particularly long-term unemployment, remained at historically high levels. In the face of this sustained weakness, the Federal Reserve kept the federal funds rate goal at an unusually low level and looked for new measures to provide extra monetary accommodation. Additional LSAP programs, often known as quantitative easing, or QE, were among them. In its public pronouncements, the FOMC began conveying its goals for future policy settings more fully, including the situations in which very low interest rates were likely to be appropriate. For example, the committee stated in December 2012 that exceptionally low interest rates would likely remain appropriate at least as long as the unemployment rate remained above a threshold of 6.5 percent and inflation remained no more than a half percentage point above the committee’s longer-run goal of 2 percent. This “forward guidance” technique was meant to persuade the public that interest rates would remain low at least until specific economic conditions were met, exerting downward pressure on longer-term rates.
Effects on Financial Regulation
When the financial market upheaval calmed, the focus naturally shifted to financial sector changes, including supervision and regulation, in order to avoid such events in the future. To lessen the risk of financial difficulty, a number of solutions have been proposed or implemented. The amount of required capital for traditional banks has increased significantly, with larger increases for so-called “systemically important” institutions (Bank for International Settlements 2011a;2011b). For the first time, liquidity criteria will legally limit the amount of maturity transformation that banks can perform (Bank for International Settlements 2013). As conditions worsen, regular stress testing will help both banks and regulators recognize risks and will require banks to spend earnings to create capital rather than pay dividends (Board of Governors 2011).
New provisions for the treatment of large financial institutions were included in the Dodd-Frank Act of 2010. The Financial Stability Oversight Council, for example, has the authority to classify unconventional credit intermediaries as “Systemically Important Financial Institutions” (SIFIs), putting them under Federal Reserve supervision. The act also established the Orderly Liquidation Authority (OLA), which authorizes the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation to wind down specific institutions if their failure would pose a significant risk to the financial system. Another provision of the act mandates that large financial institutions create “living wills,” which are detailed plans outlining how the institution could be resolved under US bankruptcy law without jeopardizing the financial system or requiring government assistance.
The financial crisis of 2008 and the accompanying recession, like the Great Depression of the 1930s and the Great Inflation of the 1970s, are important areas of research for economists and policymakers. While it may be years before the causes and ramifications of these events are fully known, the attempt to unravel them provides a valuable opportunity for the Federal Reserve and other agencies to acquire lessons that can be used to shape future policy.
What triggered the financial crisis of 2007 and 2008?
The collapse of trust between banks that happened the year before the 2008 financial crisis is known as the 2007 financial crisis. The subprime mortgage crisis, which was sparked by the uncontrolled use of derivatives, was to blame. The early warning signs, reasons, and indicators of collapse are all included in this chronology. It also details the actions taken by the US Treasury and Federal Reserve to avoid a financial meltdown. Despite this, the financial crisis resulted in the Great Recession.
What happened to the economy in 2009?
- The Great Recession was a period of economic slump that lasted from 2007 to 2009, following the bursting of the housing bubble in the United States and the worldwide financial crisis.
- The Great Recession was the worst economic downturn in the United States since the 1930s’ Great Depression.
- Federal authorities unleashed unprecedented fiscal, monetary, and regulatory policy in reaction to the Great Recession, which some, but not all, credit with the ensuing recovery.
What happened during the 2008 recession?
In 2008, the stock market plummeted. The Dow had one of the most significant point declines in history. Congress passed the Struggling Asset Relief Scheme (TARP) to empower the US Treasury to implement a major rescue program for troubled banks. The goal was to avoid a national and global economic meltdown.
What caused the global recessions of 2008 and 2009?
- The Great Recession refers to the global financial crisis that occurred in 2008-2009.
- It all started with the housing market bubble, which was fueled by an overabundance of mortgage-backed securities (MBS) that packaged high-risk loans together.
- Reckless lending resulted in an unprecedented number of defaulted loans; when the losses were added up, several financial institutions failed, necessitating a government rescue.
- The American Recovering and Reinvestment Act of 2009 was enacted to help the economy recover.
What was the primary cause of the United States’ economic catastrophe in 2008?
Years of ultra-low interest rates and lax lending rules drove a home price bubble in the United States and internationally, sowing the seeds of the financial crisis. It began with with intentions, as it always does.
Who is responsible for the 2008 Great Recession?
The Lenders are the main perpetrators. The mortgage originators and lenders bear the brunt of the blame. That’s because they’re the ones that started the difficulties in the first place. After all, it was the lenders who made loans to persons with bad credit and a high chance of default. 7 This is why it happened.
When did the financial crisis of 2007 begin?
Banks were able to create too much money, too rapidly, and utilized it to inflate housing prices and speculate on financial markets, resulting in the financial crisis.
Banks created too much money…
New money is created every time a bank makes a loan. Banks created vast quantities of new money in the run-up to the financial crisis by issuing loans. They doubled the quantity of money and debt in the economy in just seven years.
and used this money to push up house prices and speculate on financial markets
Between 2000 and 2007, just a small portion of the trillion pounds created by banks went to non-financial businesses:
- Around 31% went to residential property, causing house prices to rise faster than incomes.
- Another 20% was invested in commercial real estate (office buildings and other business property)
- Around 32% went to the financial sector, which included the same financial markets that later collapsed during the financial crisis.
- However, just 8% of all the money created by banks during this period flowed to non-financial enterprises.
Eventually the debts became unpayable
Lending significant sums of money into the real estate market drives up house prices and personal debt levels. Interest must be paid on all bank loans, and when debt grows faster than salaries, some people will eventually be unable to keep up with repayments. They stop repaying their loans at this stage, putting banks in jeopardy of going bankrupt.
This caused a financial crisis
Lord (Adair) Turner, the former head of the UK’s Financial Services Authority, remarked in February 2013:
“We failed to constrain the financial crisis of 2007-2008 because we failed to constrain the financial crisis of 2007-2008.”
Lord Adair Turner, chair of the Financial Services Authority, addressing on the 6th of February, 2013.
The financial crisis was caused by this mechanism. Following the financial crisis, banks restricted new lending to firms and households. Because of the slowdown in lending, these markets’ prices have fallen, forcing people who borrowed too much to bet on rising prices to sell their assets to repay their loans. House prices plummeted, and the housing bubble burst. As a result of the panic, banks decreased lending even further. As a result, a downward spiral develops, and the economy enters recession.
After the crisis, banks refuse to lend, and the economy shrinks
Banks lend when they’re convinced that they will be repaid. As a result, when the economy is struggling, banks choose to restrict their lending. Despite the fact that they are reducing the number of new loans they make, the public is still responsible for repaying their existing debts.
The issue is that when money is used to repay loans, it is ‘destroyed,’ or removed from the economy. According to the Bank of England:
“Repaying bank loans destroys money in the same way as taking out a new loan creates money… The most major methods in which bank deposits are made and destroyed in the modern economy are through banks providing loans and consumers repaying them.” (Bank of England, Money Creation in the Modern Economy, p3-4)
As a result, when customers return loans quicker than banks make new loans, it’s like draining the oil from a car’s engine: the economy slows down and prices fall. As a result, the economy risks falling into a ‘debt-deflation’ spiral, in which wages and prices decline while the value of people’s obligations remains constant, causing debts to become more expensive in’real’ terms. Even firms and individuals who were not involved in the creation of the bubble suffer, resulting in a recession.