This audio presentation’s full transcript may be found below. It has not been edited or proofread for readability or accuracy.
One of the deadliest phrases in economics is “recession.” A recession is a large drop in overall economic activity that lasts for a long time. During a recession, the unemployment rate often rises while real income falls. When people lose their employment and income, a slew of other bad things can ensue. As a result, recessions can have long-term consequences for people’s life.
When the economy gets off track, how does it get back on track? The government can play a role in the economy by influencing it through fiscal policy. The way the government decides to tax and spend in response to economic conditions is known as fiscal policy.
Taxes are taxes levied by the government on corporate and individual earnings, actions, property, and products. Income tax, for example, is levied on all forms of income, including salaries, wages, commissions, interest, and dividends.
Because taxes diminish income, which effects spending, the government can change the tax rate to influence the amount of money spent in the economy.
- People pay a higher percentage of their income in taxes when the government raises the income tax rate, which means they have less money to spend on goods and services.
- People have more money to spend on products and services if the government lowers the income tax rate or takes a lesser percentage of their income.
The government can have some impact over the total level of consumer expenditure by modifying tax rates.
Here’s how government spending could help. The government spends money on public goods like roadways, bridges, defense, disaster relief, and education, among other things. Because Congress and the president have the “discretion” to select how much to spend, this form of spending is referred to as discretionary spending.
Economic activity is created when the government spends money on goods and services. When the government constructs a bridge or an interstate highway, for example, it pays the firms and workers who complete the project. As a result, those businesses and employees spend their earnings on goods and services.
- If the government spends more, more economic activity is generated, and the income is distributed throughout the economy in cycles of increased expenditure and income.
- If the government curtailed spending, there would be no additional revenue created by the government, and enterprises and workers would have less money to spend, causing the economy to slow.
- As a result, changes in government spending can have an impact on the economy as a whole.
These are some very basic tax and spending explanations. Let’s look at recessions and inflation in more detail to understand how taxes and government expenditures can wreak havoc on the economy. Keep in mind that the ultimate goal is to stabilize the economy.
The economy contracts during a recession, and the unemployment rate is expected to rise. Firms and consumers are simply not spending enough to keep the economy fully employed there is a gap between total spending in the economy and the level of expenditure required to keep the economy fully employed.
In this instance, the government may pursue an expansionary fiscal policy in order to encourage the economy to expand. Here are some ideas on how taxes and government expenditures could be utilized to close part of the budget gap.
First and foremost, there are taxes. Tax rates may be reduced by the government. People can keep more of their earnings when tax rates are reduced. Policyholders expect that some of this newfound disposable income will be spent. Furthermore, if individuals spend more money on goods and services, firms are more inclined to produce additional goods and services. Businesses will likely order more raw materials and equipment as production expands, as well as hire extra workers or require present employees to work longer hours. Policymakers believe that as new and current employees earn more money, they will spend part of it on products and services, causing a ripple effect that will help the economy grow. More spending leads to more output, which leads to more spending and output, and so on.
Second, government spending has the potential to cause economic ripples. The government may, for example, increase spending and construct new interstate highways and bridges. A stimulus package is a term used to describe such spending. The purpose of this additional expenditure is for it to end up in households’ pockets as wages and profits. As more money is spent by households, it generates more money for others. Because the initial spending has such a huge impact on the economy, these waves of income are commonly referred to as the multiplier effect.
Expansionary fiscal policy is divisive since lowering tax rates and expanding spending will almost certainly have a negative impact on the government’s budget. As a result, the deficit and national debt may increase.
If expenditure grows faster than planned, though, another risk may arise: inflation. Inflation is a general, long-term increase in the price of goods and services in a given economy. Inflation is brought on by a variety of factors “Too much money is being spent on too few commodities.” Many policymakers believe that fiscal policy may be utilized to combat inflation because the total level of expenditure is the basis of the problem. To put it another way, they propose that the government utilize its fiscal policy powers to lower overall spending in the economy in order to alleviate price pressure. Contractionary fiscal policy is what it’s termed.
The government may raise tax rates in order to cut overall spending. As more money is collected in taxes, less money is available for expenditure, which helps to reduce inflationary pressures.
Reduced government spending would have the same effect. Less spending on projects by the government equals less money in household pockets, fewer goods and services purchased, and so on. This, too, is intended to ease rising price pressure.
However, most economists believe that fiscal policy is not the greatest way to combat inflation. Instead, because inflation is a result of “They believe that lowering inflation by reducing the expansion of the money supply by influencing interest rates is a better method than “too much money chasing too few commodities.” The Federal Reserve, which is in charge of monetary policy, accomplishes this.
Policy lags are a fundamental fiscal policy concern. If the economy takes a sharp turn, it can take a long time to devise new policy, and even longer for it to take effect, so there is a time lag between taking action and bringing about change. It can take months to notice that the economy has entered a recession, for example. Then there would be substantial debate and negotiation over the new legislation needed to boost the economy. It must be approved by both the House of Representatives and the Senate before being signed by the president. It’s possible that economic conditions will have changed, gotten worse, or even improved by the time new policy is adopted. And it takes time for new policies to have an influence on the economy. As a result, it might take a long time for households and businesses to notice changes in revenue once tax rates are adjusted or expenditure initiatives are approved.
Our government, on the other hand, has built-in economic policies and programs known as automatic stabilizers that help to soften the economy’s fluctuations. When the economy shifts in either direction, these stabilizers alter taxes and spending automatically without the need for new legislation.
The United States, for example, has a progressive income tax. Taxes are paid at a higher rate by high-income earners than by low-income earners. To put it another way, as employees earn more money, they pay a greater tax rate. When the economy is growing, most people have jobs, and investors and firms are making large profits, they pay a higher tax rate on their earnings. And in a fully employed economy, practically every available worker pays income taxes. Higher tax rates and more tax dollars are the result of this automatic stabilizer; while the economy is growing, components of contractionary policy are automatically implemented. Similarly, when the economy is in a slump, people’s incomes tend to diminish, resulting in them paying a reduced tax rate. Also, because there are more unemployed people, fewer people pay income tax. When the economy slows, components of expansionary policy are automatically triggered by this automatic stabilizer, resulting in a lower tax rate and less tax dollars received.
On the government spending side, there are also automatic stabilizers, such as unemployment insurance. Workers who lose their jobs due to no fault of their own are eligible for this program, which provides money for a limited time. During recessions, the government spends more money on this program because many individuals lose their employment. This is a policy of expansion: It gives additional revenue to help people who are in need. When the money is spent, it gives a helping hand to a sagging economy. Similarly, when the economy is booming, people have no trouble finding work. Unemployment insurance spending is automatically reduced by the government, which is a contractionary policy.
The economy is cushioned by automatic stabilizers as it goes through ups and downs. The gaps are substantially lower because these tax and spending schemes do not necessitate new legislation from Congress and the administration.
Let’s go over everything again. Recessions and high-inflation eras are difficult economic conditions to deal with. The entire level of spending falls during a recession. The government can close the budget deficit through taxing and spending. If the government pursues an expansionary policy, lowering tax rates while increasing spending on goods and services, the economy would likely see an increase in income and spending. However, expansionary fiscal policy is divisive because it is expected to increase government debt levels. The government could implement a contractionary fiscal strategy to tackle inflation. In this situation, it may boost taxes while reducing government spending in order to cut overall spending. Many economists believe that the Federal Reserve’s monetary policy is more effective at reducing inflation. Any new legislation to boost the economy suffers from policy lags when Congress finally acts. Economic conditions, for example, may alter while new policies are developed and implemented. Thankfully, the government has automatic stabilizers in place, such as the progressive income tax and unemployment insurance, which react to changes in the economy automatically.
There are ups and downs in the economy. When it veers off course, the government may intervene to help it get back on track.
During a recession, are taxes reduced?
The majority of the time, tax cuts are employed to bring a recession to a conclusion. It’s a well-liked kind of fiscal expansion. Tax cuts, in the near run, increase government debt since they lower revenue.
What effect does a recession have on taxes?
The Great Recession demonstrates how tax revenues plummeted during a severe downturn. Individual income tax revenues declined by 16 percent. Revenues from consumer taxes, on the other hand, fell by 9%, while revenues from social insurance taxes fell by just 5%.
What happens to wages during a downturn?
What happens to personal income during a recession? During a recession, income decreases. Those who stay employed often have their hours reduced. Many people will accept underemployment, earning less than they are capable of just to get by.
Are increased taxes detrimental to the economy?
They discover that taxes have a highly non-linear influence on growth: for low rates and modest changes, the effects are basically zero, but the economic damage accumulates as the original tax rate and rate changes increase.
What effect do taxes have on inflation?
If exchange rate gains are taxed at the same rate as interest income, the actual return on all assets for domestic individuals falls equally. 13 These findings suggest that inflation has a significant impact on the real return to saving.
What makes taxation so contentious?
Most tax expenditures function similarly to spending programs, which means they may benefit or harm the public depending on whether they accomplish a valid public goal in the most efficient way possible. Tax expenditures, on the other hand, are difficult to identify and quantify.
Instead of boosting measured spending, subsidies and expenditures in the form of tax benefits diminish the measure of net tax revenue. As a result, they appear to be shrinking government. As a result, tax breaks have a great political appeal. In truth, tax expenditures are a different way for the government to participate in the economy, and they, like direct spending, must be funded by increased taxes or cuts elsewhere.
Consider a new government program that offers $5 billion in tax credits for energy generation each year and is funded by hiking income tax rates. To pay for the energy tax credit, the government would have to hike tax rates by $5 billion, similar to what it would have to do if energy production subsidies were delivered through a US Department of Energy grant rather than tax credits.
The problematic thing is that tax expenditures are characterized as departures from a baseline tax system. The equivalent between an energy tax credit and a spending program is easy to observe in the example above. However, because what belongs in the baseline tax system represents analyst judgment, the definition and expected quantity of tax expenditures are frequently a question of judgment.
Since the government began reporting tax expenditures on a regular basis in the 1970s, a variant of a comprehensive income tax has served as the benchmark against which tax expenditures have been measured. However, there have always been exceptions, most notably for revenue that is difficult to calculate. For example, income is typically, but not always, considered only when it is realized, therefore deferral or exclusion from taxation for unrealized capital gains is not a tax expenditure, but other forms of postponement of revenues by businesses are. In addition, the US Department of the Treasury, but not the Joint Committee on Taxation (JCT), incorporates net imputed rental income from homeownership in its tax expenditure baseline.
Some provisions currently defined as tax expenditures would no longer be considered such if the current income tax were replaced entirely or partially by a consumption tax, as some economists and political leaders advocate. Consumption, rather than income, would constitute the tax basis in a comprehensive consumption tax system. As a result, tax expenditures would not include the deferral of earnings into retirement savings accounts and the exemption of income received inside those accounts. However, most other tax expenditures, such as the deductibility of house mortgage interest, charitable contributions, and state and local taxes, as well as the exemption of employer payments to health insurance plans, would continue to be categorized as such.
In some circumstances, predicting the extent of a tax expenditure necessitates some discretion. Firms can recover the expenses of capital investment over time using depreciation deductions that represent the reduction in the value of their assets, for example, under an income tax. But, in an inflationary economy, what is the proper measure of depreciation? The JCT and the Treasury utilize differing definitions of what would be covered in a normal or comprehensive income tax for these and other things. As a result, they classify and assess some tax expenditures differently.
Furthermore, depending on when the two estimates were created, the Office of Management and Budget and the JCT projections can differ. In 2018, the Joint Committee on Taxation estimates (issued in May 2018) incorporated the effects of the 2017 Tax Cuts and Jobs Act, although the Office of Management and Budget projections (published in February 2018, but based on Treasury estimates first released in October 2017) did not.
When the government raises taxes, what happens?
- The government has the authority to tax, giving it more control over its money. Higher taxes can be imposed by the federal, state, and municipal governments in order to boost income. Selling labor, commodities, and services to generate revenue is a more harder task for households and enterprises.
- The federal government can borrow money from the financial markets to cover budget deficits. Because they are backed by the government’s taxing power, investors perceive US government bonds to be risk-free. Bonds are also issued by states and towns to fund deficits. These bonds, on the other hand, are regarded riskier because the state or city’s revenue base may decline.
- Only the federal government, and only the federal government, has the authority to print new money. This, like rising taxes, might have both economic and political ramifications (in the form of higher inflation). Nonetheless, the federal government has that choice, which is not available to individuals or enterprises.
These distinct traits distinguish the government from the rest of the economy’s actors. They also put the federal government in a better position to develop and implement economic policies.
Fiscal Fundamentals
The federal government’s taxing and expenditure policies and operations, particularly as they effect the economy, are referred to as fiscal policy. (Policies affecting interest rates and the money supply are referred to as monetary policy.)
C + I + G add together to determine the equilibrium level of GDP, as shown in Figure 13.1. (For the sake of simplicity, we’ll assume that net exports (Ex – Im) are zero.) Consumer consumption is represented by line?C? The?C+I? line reflects consumer consumption plus corporate investment. Consumption plus investment plus government spending is represented by the line?C+I+G?
In a downturn, who benefits?
Question from the audience: Identify and explain economic variables that may be positively affected by the economic slowdown.
A recession is a time in which the economy grows at a negative rate. It’s a time of rising unemployment, lower salaries, and increased government debt. It usually results in financial costs.
- Companies that provide low-cost entertainment. Bookmakers and publicans are thought to do well during a recession because individuals want to ‘drink their sorrows away’ with little bets and becoming intoxicated. (However, research suggest that life expectancy increases during recessions, contradicting this old wives tale.) Demand for online-streaming and online entertainment is projected to increase during the 2020 Coronavirus recession.
- Companies that are suffering with bankruptcies and income loss. Pawnbrokers and companies that sell pay day loans, for example people in need of money turn to loan sharks.
- Companies that sell substandard goods. (items whose demand increases as income decreases) e.g. value goods, second-hand retailers, etc. Some businesses, such as supermarkets, will be unaffected by the recession. People will reduce their spending on luxuries, but not on food.
- Longer-term efficiency gains Some economists suggest that a recession can help the economy become more productive in the long run. A recession is a shock, and inefficient businesses may go out of business, but it also allows for the emergence of new businesses. It’s what Joseph Schumpeter dubbed “creative destruction” the idea that when some enterprises fail, new inventive businesses can emerge and develop.
- It’s worth noting that in a downturn, solid, efficient businesses can be put out of business due to cash difficulties and a temporary decline in revenue. It is not true that all businesses that close down are inefficient. Furthermore, the loss of enterprises entails the loss of experience and knowledge.
- Falling asset values can make purchasing a home more affordable. For first-time purchasers, this is a good option. It has the potential to aid in the reduction of wealth disparities.
- It is possible that one’s life expectancy will increase. According to studies from the Great Depression, life expectancy increased in areas where unemployment increased. This may seem counterintuitive, but the idea is that unemployed people will spend less money on alcohol and drugs, resulting in improved health. They may do fewer car trips and hence have a lower risk of being involved in fatal car accidents. NPR
The rate of inflation tends to reduce during a recession. Because unemployment rises, wage inflation is moderated. Firms also respond to decreased demand by lowering prices.
Those on fixed incomes or who have cash savings may profit from the decrease in inflation. It may also aid in the reduction of long-term inflationary pressures. For example, the 1980/81 recession helped to bring inflation down from 1970s highs.
After the Lawson boom and double-digit inflation, the 1991 Recession struck.
Efficiency increase?
It has been suggested that a recession encourages businesses to become more efficient or go out of business. A recession might hasten the ‘creative destruction’ process. Where inefficient businesses fail, efficient businesses thrive.
Covid Recession 2020
The Covid-19 epidemic was to blame for the terrible recession of 2020. Some industries were particularly heavily damaged by the recession (leisure, travel, tourism, bingo halls). However, several businesses benefited greatly from the Covid-recession. We shifted to online delivery when consumers stopped going to the high street and shopping malls. Online behemoths like Amazon saw a big boost in sales. For example, Amazon’s market capitalisation increased by $570 billion in the first seven months of 2020, owing to strong sales growth (Forbes).
Profitability hasn’t kept pace with Amazon’s surge in sales. Because necessities like toilet paper have a low profit margin, profit growth has been restrained. Amazon has taken the uncommon step of reducing demand at times. They also experienced additional costs as a result of Covid, such as paying for overtime and dealing with Covid outbreaks in their warehouses. However, due to increased demand for online streaming, Amazon saw fast development in its cloud computing networks. These are the more profitable areas of the business.
Apple, Google, and Facebook all had significant revenue and profit growth during an era when companies with a strong online presence benefited.
The current recession is unique in that there are more huge winners and losers than ever before. It all depends on how the virus’s dynamics effect the firm as well as aggregate demand.
Why did money become scarce during the Great Depression?
During the Great Depression, the money stock decreased mostly due to banking panics. Depositors’ faith that they will be able to access their cash in banks whenever they need them is crucial to banking systems.