What Is Positive Inflation?

Inflation is defined as a rise in the average price of goods and services. It’s important to note that this does not imply that all prices are rising at the same rate. Indeed, if enough prices fall, the average may fall as well, leading to negative inflation, often known as deflation.

What is an example of inflation that is beneficial?

If the price of oil rises from $75 to $100 per barrel, for example, input prices for firms would rise, as will transportation expenses for everyone.

What are the benefits and drawbacks of inflation?

Do you need help comprehending inflation and its good and negative repercussions if you’re studying HSC Economics? Continue reading to learn more!

Inflation is described as a long-term increase in the general level of prices in the economy. It has a disproportionately unfavorable impact on economic decision-making and lowers purchasing power. It does, however, have one positive effect: it prevents deflation.

What is the definition of positive deflation?

The bad perception of deflation in the past can be related to the fact that deflation was mostly unanticipated. Farmers, who believed that the prices of the commodities they produced had fallen faster than the prices of the manufactured items they consumed, no doubt contributed to the negative perception of deflation in the United States.

Bordo, Landon Lane, and Redish concentrate on the late-nineteenth-century pricing levels and growth experiences of the United States, the United Kingdom, and Germany. This period, like the current one, was marked by low inflation or even deflation, rapid growth spurred mostly by technological progress, and a reliable and universally recognised gold standard. The researchers start with the assumption that deflation can be beneficial, harmful, or even neutral. They argue that positive deflation happens when aggregate supply of goods increases faster than aggregate demand (due to technical advancements, greater productivity, and other factors), resulting in lower prices. In turn, bad deflation happens when aggregate demand declines faster than aggregate supply grows. Negative money shocks, for example, that are non-neutral over a long period of time – such as those experienced later in the Great Depression – would result in “bad” deflation. According to the writers, this may be the reality in Japan today. Meanwhile, a deflationary neutral effect could emerge if monetary neutrality is maintained despite negative money shocks.

Separate “supply shocks,” “money supply shocks,” and “non-monetary demand shocks” on output and prices are identified by the researchers. Their research is based on a money supply model based on the international gold standard. Their findings show that deflation in the late nineteenth century in the three major industrial countries was caused by both positive aggregate supply shocks and negative money supply shocks. The latter, however, had only a minimal impact on output. As a result, the data implies that deflation throughout the nineteenth century was primarily beneficial, if not neutral.

Even though there are variations between the setting of their study and that of the present day, Bordo, Landon Lane, and Redish feel their conclusions are applicable to today’s economies. Three of these distinctions are notable. The first was the classical gold standard regime, in which all three countries followed the gold standard convertibility norm and were all subjected to the same money shock: swings in gold demand and supply. Second, it appears that aggregate supply was a major source of shocks in the nineteenth century. This contrasts with the demand-driven deflation that happened in 1920-1, as well as later after the stock market disaster of 1929, and the economic troubles that faced Japan in the 1990s. Finally, the negative demand shocks that occurred had only a little impact on output. This, the analysts point out, is in stark contrast to the experience of 1929-33, when many observers attributed output decreases in the face of monetary contraction to nominal rigidities such as wages.

Bordo, Landon Lane, and Redish also note that their research does not address a number of difficulties raised by the current discussion over the onset of deflation. Before 1914, for example, central banks rarely employed monetary policy to support national economies, unlike today. Bordo, Landon Lane, and Redish also don’t make a clear distinction between the consequences of current and predicted price level increases. They emphasize that it is unanticipated deflation that has detrimental implications.

Finally, Bordo, Landon Lane, and Redish point out that, while 19th-century deflation was primarily of the positive sort, it was not widely regarded as such. Deflation, according to popular opinion in the United States, the United Kingdom, and Germany at the time, was an obvious symptom, if not a direct cause, of economic depression. Such a viewpoint explains why there is still fear about deflation in the United States, Europe, Japan, and China today. The researchers, on the other hand, argue that “The bad perception of deflation in the past can be attributable to the fact that deflation was generally unanticipated. Farmers, who believed that the prices of the commodities they produced had fallen faster than the prices of the manufactured items they consumed, very doubt contributed to the unfavorable perception of deflation in the United States.” The experts argue that the re-emergence of deflation now would undoubtedly be as unpopular.

What are three advantages to inflation?

Inflationary Impacts Questions Answered Profits are higher because producers can sell at higher prices. Investors and businesses are rewarded for investing in productive activities, resulting in higher investment returns. Production will increase. There will be more jobs and a higher wage.

Who benefits the most from inflation?

Inflation is defined as a steady increase in the price level. Inflation means that money loses its purchasing power and can buy fewer products than before.

  • Inflation will assist people with huge debts, making it simpler to repay their debts as prices rise.

What are the four different kinds of inflation?

When the cost of goods and services rises, this is referred to as inflation. Inflation is divided into four categories based on its speed. “Creeping,” “walking,” “galloping,” and “hyperinflation” are some of the terms used. Asset inflation and wage inflation are two different types of inflation. Demand-pull (also known as “price inflation”) and cost-push inflation are two additional types of inflation, according to some analysts, yet they are also sources of inflation. The increase of the money supply is also a factor.

What makes positive inflation desirable?

Inflation is and has been a contentious topic in economics. Even the term “inflation” has diverse connotations depending on the situation. Many economists, businesspeople, and politicians believe that mild inflation is necessary to stimulate consumer spending, presuming that higher levels of expenditure are necessary for economic progress.

How Can Inflation Be Good For The Economy?

The Federal Reserve usually sets an annual rate of inflation for the United States, believing that a gradually rising price level makes businesses successful and stops customers from waiting for lower costs before buying. In fact, some people argue that the primary purpose of inflation is to avert deflation.

Others, on the other hand, feel that inflation is little, if not a net negative on the economy. Rising costs make saving more difficult, forcing people to pursue riskier investing techniques in order to grow or keep their wealth. Some argue that inflation enriches some businesses or individuals while hurting the majority.

The Federal Reserve aims for 2% annual inflation, thinking that gradual price rises help businesses stay profitable.

Understanding Inflation

The term “inflation” is frequently used to characterize the economic impact of rising oil or food prices. If the price of oil rises from $75 to $100 per barrel, for example, input prices for firms would rise, as will transportation expenses for everyone. As a result, many other prices may rise as well.

Most economists, however, believe that the actual meaning of inflation is slightly different. Inflation is a result of the supply and demand for money, which means that generating more dollars reduces the value of each dollar, causing the overall price level to rise.

Key Takeaways

  • Inflation, according to economists, occurs when the supply of money exceeds the demand for it.
  • When inflation helps to raise consumer demand and consumption, which drives economic growth, it is considered as a positive.
  • Some people believe inflation is necessary to prevent deflation, while others say it is a drag on the economy.
  • Some inflation, according to John Maynard Keynes, helps to avoid the Paradox of Thrift, or postponed consumption.

When Inflation Is Good

When the economy isn’t operating at full capacity, which means there’s unsold labor or resources, inflation can theoretically assist boost output. More money means higher spending, which corresponds to more aggregated demand. As a result of increased demand, more production is required to supply that need.

To avoid the Paradox of Thrift, British economist John Maynard Keynes argued that some inflation was required. According to this theory, if consumer prices are allowed to decline steadily as a result of the country’s increased productivity, consumers learn to postpone purchases in order to get a better deal. This paradox has the net effect of lowering aggregate demand, resulting in lower production, layoffs, and a faltering economy.

Inflation also helps borrowers by allowing them to repay their loans with less valuable money than they borrowed. This fosters borrowing and lending, which boosts expenditure across the board. The fact that the United States is the world’s greatest debtor, and inflation serves to ease the shock of its vast debt, is perhaps most crucial to the Federal Reserve.

Economists used to believe that inflation and unemployment had an inverse connection, and that rising unemployment could be combated by increasing inflation. The renowned Phillips curve defined this relationship. When the United States faced stagflation in the 1970s, the Phillips curve was severely discredited.

What are the consequences of inflation?

  • Inflation, or the gradual increase in the price of goods and services over time, has a variety of positive and negative consequences.
  • Inflation reduces purchasing power, or the amount of something that can be bought with money.
  • Because inflation reduces the purchasing power of currency, customers are encouraged to spend and store up on products that depreciate more slowly.

What are two of the consequences of rising inflation?

Inflation has the following negative macroeconomic repercussions in addition to rising consumer costs, which disproportionately affect low-income households:

1. Interest rates that are higher.

In the long run, inflation leads to higher interest rates. When the government expands the money supply, interest rates fall at first because there is more money available. However, the increasing money supply causes higher equilibrium prices and a decreased value of money, causing banks and other financial institutions to hike rates to compensate for the loss of purchasing power of their funds. Higher long-term rates deter corporate borrowing, resulting in lower capital goods and technology investment.

2. A decrease in exports.

Higher goods costs suggest that other countries will find it less appealing to buy our products. This will result in a drop in exports, decreased output, and increased unemployment in our country.

3. Less money saved.

Inflation pushes people to spend instead of save. People are more likely to buy more things now, before they become more expensive later. They discourage people from saving since money saved for the future will be worth less. Savings are required to raise the amount of money available in the financial markets. This enables companies to borrow money to invest in capital equipment and technology. Long-term economic growth is fueled by advances in technology and capital goods. Inflation encourages people to spend more, which discourages saving and inhibits economic progress.

Malinvestments are number four.

Inflation leads to poor investing decisions. When prices rise, the value of some investments rises more quickly than the value of others. Prices of existing houses, land, gold, silver, other precious metals, and antiques, for example, rise when inflation rises. During periods of rising inflation, more money is invested in these assets than in other, more productive assets. These assets, on the other hand, are existing assets, and investing in them does not expand our nation’s wealth or employment. Rather than investing in businesses that generate new wealth, monies are diverted to assets that do not add to the country’s economic capability. Because of shifting inflation, investing in productive and innovative business operations is risky. An investor planning to spend $2 million in a new business anticipates a specific return. If, for example, inflation is 12%, the rate of return must be at least that, or the investor will lose real income. If the investor is concerned that he or she will not be able to return at least 12 percent on the investment, the new firm will not be started.

Furthermore, while present property owners may benefit from an increase in the value of their properties, current property buyers suffer. Current customers pay exaggerated prices for land, housing, and other goods. Some workers who may have bought a home ten or fifteen years ago are unable to do so now.

5. Government spending that is inefficient.

When the government uses newly issued money to support its expenditures, it simply collects the profits made by the Federal Reserve System on the newly printed money. Free money is not spent as wisely or efficiently as money earned via greater hardship, according to experience. There is a level of accountability when the government raises taxes to raise revenue. There is no accountability when the government obtains funding through newly minted money until citizens become aware of the true cause of inflation.

6. Increases in taxes.

Taxes rise in response to rising prices. Nominal (rather than actual) salaries rise in tandem with inflation, pushing higher-income individuals into higher tax rates. Despite the fact that purchasing power does not improve, a person pays the government a larger portion of his or her income. Houses, land, and other real estate are all subject to higher property taxes. Tax rates will remain constant if the government modifies the brackets in lockstep with inflation; unfortunately, the government sometimes fails to adjust the brackets, or just partially adjusts them. Higher tax rates will result as a result of this.

Why do governments (more precisely, central banks, or in the United States, the Federal Reserve) continue to print money and induce inflation, despite the risks? This can be explained in a number of ways. The ability to print money provides governments with unrestricted access to funds. Every year, the Federal Reserve prints billions of dollars and distributes them to the general government, which spends the money on various products. Furthermore, printing money can stimulate the economy in the near run because an increase in the money supply decreases short-term interest rates. Many individuals (especially politicians, because elections occur regularly) favor short-term rewards over long-term ones in our age of immediate gratification.

Another benefit of inflation (for the government) is that it raises nominal wages and pushes people into higher tax rates if tax brackets are not fully adjusted (see harmful effect 6 above). Increased taxes equal more income for the government (and people won’t blame politicians for higher taxes if they don’t understand why inflation is occurring).

Finally, borrowers who have borrowed money benefit from inflation because they may repay their loans in deflated dollars. Governments are the greatest borrowers in most economies, so they have a vested interest in keeping inflation high. People who save, on the other hand, have the opposite problem (mostly private citizens that save and people that try to build up a pension). Inflation reduces the value of future savings, putting many ordinary persons at a disadvantage. Financial markets are also damaged (see adverse effect 3 above), as less funds are accessible in the financial markets as savings decline (i.e. less money for research and development, business expansions, etc.).

Is inflation or deflation preferable?

Deflation is preferable to inflation. Deflation fully destroys the economy, whereas moderate inflation promotes economic growth by encouraging additional investments, production, and employment. In the above link, you can learn about Inflation in the Economy- Types of Inflation, Inflation Remedies.

Deflation, on the other side, results in a loss of production, investments, and jobs.