When markets decline, many investors want to get out as soon as possible to avoid the anguish of losing money. The market is really improving future rewards for investors who buy in by discounting stocks at these times. Great companies are well positioned to grow in the next 10 to 20 years, so a drop in asset values indicates even higher potential future returns.
As a result, a recession when prices are typically lower is the ideal time to maximize profits. If made during a recession, the investments listed below have the potential to yield higher returns over time.
Stock funds
Investing in a stock fund, whether it’s an ETF or a mutual fund, is a good idea during a recession. A fund is less volatile than a portfolio of a few equities, and investors are betting more on the economy’s recovery and an increase in market mood than on any particular stock. If you can endure the short-term volatility, a stock fund can provide significant long-term returns.
Do stocks rise during a downturn?
The graphic above (which only includes recessions from the 1950s as given by NBER) has many major takeaways:
- Length. Since 1953, the average length of a recession has been 10.3 months. The Covid recession lasted barely two months, while the Great Financial Crisis of 2008 lasted nearly twice as long.
- Prior to and during economic downturns. The S&P 500’s cumulative price return was lowest in the year leading up to a recession (-3%), followed by six months before (-2%), compared to an average loss of 1% during a recession. Furthermore, approximately half of the time, returns were positive across all three periods. Markets look ahead, whereas economic data looks back.
- After a downturn. It should come as no surprise that as time passes following a recession, cumulative returns become increasingly positive. Stocks, after all, tend to go up rather than down. And the longer you invest, the less likely it is that you will lose money. Positive returns approximately double in frequency.
- Every time is unique. History is a valuable resource, but it cannot be used to foretell the future. The 1980 recession ended a year before the beginning of the 1981 recession. The ramifications can be seen in the graphs above. Similarly, the Great Recession of 2008-2009 was by far the worst for stocks during a downturn, and the outperformance one year after the Covid fall was an exception as well. Despite the year-to-date decline, the S&P 500 has gained more than 59 percent since the conclusion of the 2020 recession in May 2020 (almost 64 percent if dividends are included!). 1
During a recession, what costs more?
- We must first grasp the business cycle in order to comprehend the state of the economy and how recessions affect investors.
- The business cycle describes the swings in economic activity that a country’s economy goes through throughout time.
- The economy is strong and growing at the top of the business cycle, and company stock values are frequently at all-time highs.
- Income and employment fall during the recession phase of the business cycle, and stock prices fall as companies fight to maintain profitability.
- When stock prices rise after a big decrease, it indicates that the economy has entered the trough phase of the business cycle.
Should you invest in stocks during a downturn?
In a downturn, the manner in which you invest is just as crucial as the type of investment you make. Stocks are notoriously volatile during recessions, as anyone who was involved in the market during the 2008-09 financial crisis will attest.
Invest in little increments rather than trying to time the market. Dollar-cost averaging is a method that involves investing equal dollar amounts at regular intervals rather than all at once. If prices continue to drop, you’ll be able to take advantage and buy more. And, if prices begin to rise, you’ll finish up buying more shares at cheaper prices and less shares as your preferred equities rise in value.
In a word, a recession might be an excellent moment to purchase high-quality company stocks at bargain rates.
During the Great Depression, what was the best investment?
The Dow Jones Industrial Average began a downward trend on Oct. 24, 1929, with a 12.8 percent drop on Oct. 28 and an 11.7 percent drop the next day.
The Dow had fallen 89 percent from its 1929 high by the end of the bear market in 1932, wiping out all of the Roaring Twenties gains, and the country was in the throes of the Great Depression.
The Great Crash was caused by a variety of factors, including excessive speculation, a faltering global economy, and unethical investing techniques, according to historians. Even though the world is significantly different now than it was in 1929, the Great Crash and the economic devastation that followed can teach us a lot.
always-good pieces of advice
1. Diversify your portfolio. Even though stocks plummeted in the 1929 crash, government bonds provided investors with a safe haven. Bonds wouldn’t have totally protected you from stock market losses, but they would have substantially lessened the pain.
2. Maintain a cash reserve. Your most valuable asset is yourself, and if you lose your work, you’ll need some funds to keep your family afloat.
Furthermore, having a cash reserve can assist you in finding deals in the aftermath of a market downturn. During the Great Depression, mutual fund pioneer John Templeton put $10,000 into 104 companies and acquired shares for less than a dollar each. Near the conclusion of WWII, he sold them for around $40,000 each.
3. Never bet more money than you can afford to lose. In the run-up to the crash, buying stocks on margin was typical, with as little as 10% down.
You would double your money if your stock climbed 10%. You would lose your entire investment if it plummeted 10%.
Some mutual funds put their whole assets on margin, prompting other funds to do the same.
4. Try not to become engrossed in the hysteria. Stocks had had a long run-up to the 1929 crisis, and their prices were exceedingly high in relation to earnings.
Radio Corporation of America, for example, was a highly expensive high-tech stock at the time. Increasingly, even individuals who should have known better were enticed to enter the market by rising prices.
In September 1929, Yale economist Irving Fisher stated, “Stock prices have hit what appears to be a permanently high level.”
In a crisis, what is the best asset to own?
During a recession, you might be tempted to sell all of your investments, but experts advise against doing so. When the rest of the economy is fragile, there are usually a few sectors that continue to grow and provide investors with consistent returns.
Consider investing in the healthcare, utilities, and consumer goods sectors if you wish to protect yourself in part with equities during a recession. Regardless of the health of the economy, people will continue to spend money on medical care, household items, electricity, and food. As a result, during busts, these stocks tend to fare well (and underperform during booms).
What were the best investments in 2008?
With markets in shambles as the Coronavirus spreads, it’s worth looking back at the Global Financial Crisis of 2007-2009. This was the worst financial catastrophe most investors had ever seen.
- How could investors have secured their portfolios during the Great Recession and earlier financial crises?
What causes major bear markets and recessions?
The majority of financial crises occur when financial assets trade at inflated, often illogical, values. This can happen for a variety of reasons. Market bubbles are frequently fueled by “easy money.” Consumer price inflation is not as high as it used to be because of low interest rates and cheap borrowing. However, they do cause asset price inflation. Low interest rates and credit availability, along with market narratives, frequently result in bubbles.
Bubbles have popped in internet stocks, real estate (during the Great Recession), cryptocurrencies, and cannabis stocks over the last two decades. All of these bubbles had one thing in common: they all told a story about how big these businesses will become in the future. It doesn’t take much to start a trend with cheap money and a compelling story. The tendency is then interpreted as evidence that the narrative is right, resulting in an influx of buyers to the market. Bubbles are frequently fueled by regular investors, who are aided by the financial media.
In a nutshell, historical tendencies are extrapolated, and investors are concerned about missing out. Valuations and economic reality aren’t given any thought. One of two things happens eventually. There will be no more buyers when everyone who is likely to invest has already done so. Any negative news now will cause the trend to reverse.
On the other hand, news will eventually reveal how overvalued assets have gotten. The cannabis industry is a recent example. After recreational cannabis was legalized in Canada for a year, it became clear that the market was a fraction of what had been predicted.
What happened during the Global Financial Crisis?
Here’s a quick rundown of what happened leading up to, during, and after the Global Financial Crisis:
Between 2001 and 2006, the US housing market experienced a bubble. Low interest rates and a surge in subprime lending contributed to this. Lending methods became riskier as the bubble grew. Banks began to issue mortgage-backed securities, allowing institutions to participate in the subprime mortgage market. This insured that money could keep flowing into the market. The bubble would have broken much sooner if this hadn’t happened.
In their own trading operations, banks also increased the leverage they utilized. To meet demand, they began to develop fake goods tied to the mortgage market. Because of the scale of the bubble that was forming, several hedge funds and bank dealers were glad to offer these goods.
In 2006, property prices finally began to decline. This resulted in mortgage defaults by homeowners who relied on capital appreciation to fund their loans. Lenders foreclosed on homes and then attempted to resell them. The property market was put under even more strain as a result of this. As the number of defaults mounted, investors realized how much danger they had taken on by purchasing mortgage-backed securities. They attempted to sell the securities, but there were no takers at the time.
Mortgage-related funds began to fail in 2007. Notably, two Bear Stearns-backed funds failed, resulting in significant losses for the bank. Liquidity in the economy dried up as banks began to deleverage and restrict their exposure to the subprime market. The fallout from the banking and real estate industries expanded to the stock market in October, causing stock prices to plummet.
Early in 2008, the first economic stimulus package was passed, although it was too late for several businesses. Despite a bailout attempt by the US Treasury Secretary in March, Bear Stearns failed. To keep the entire mortgage market from collapsing, the government was compelled to take over Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac later in the year. Then Lehman Brothers went bankrupt, and Bank of America purchased Merrill Lynch, which was on the verge of going bankrupt.
Liquidity difficulties in US markets had begun to affect markets around the world by this time. The global financial system was drained of liquidity and credit availability due to a lack of liquidity in the US banking sector. This is why the credit crisis is commonly referred to as the market meltdown.
Around the world, economic stimulus programs were enacted between September 2008 and February 2009. The American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009, the most recent of these, was a $787 billion economic stimulus plan adopted in February. Soon after, markets began to rebound but it took four years for stocks to recoup their losses.
What caused the GFC?
The Global Financial Crisis was brought about by a confluence of events. The reasons of the Great Recession can be divided into three categories:
Housing bubble
The Global Financial Crisis can be traced back to an increase of sub-prime lending combined with extremely low interest rates. Sub-prime loans are those granted to people who have poor credit, few assets, and may not have a stable income. Following the dotcom bubble, US interest rates peaked at roughly 7%. After that, by 2004, they had dropped to record low levels. Mortgages become more accessible for low-income people due to the low interest rate environment.
The mortgage industry has become extremely profitable and competitive. To ensure that they could obtain as much business as possible, lenders began cutting corners and even committing fraud. As a result, many people with little income and resources were forced to take out mortgages they couldn’t pay and didn’t comprehend.
The position in which government-backed mortgage markets found themselves magnified the volume and quality of mortgages. Fannie Mae (Federal National Mortgage Association) and Freddie Mac (Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation) are mortgage securitization businesses. The government backs the mortgages these businesses sell, but they still have to compete in the market like any other institution. They have to take on more hazardous mortgages sold by banks in order to maintain market dominance.
Despite the fact that interest rates began to rise in 2004, they remained historically low. More purchasers entered the real estate market as a result of low rates and easier access to financing. As a result, property values have risen. People began purchasing homes solely on the premise that the mortgage costs would be covered by capital gain. If you’re able to refinance or “You can effectively cover the mortgage with the capital gain if you “flip” a house at a higher price every few months.
As the subprime market got more competitive, lenders began issuing different types of mortgages in order to appeal to a broader range of potential house purchasers. All of these mortgages had one thing in common: they made mortgage payments more affordable for the first few months. The hitch was that in many situations, after an initial period, the repayments would climb. Lenders were unconcerned about defaults since defaulting would result in the lender becoming the owner of the property and house prices were soaring. Millions of people effectively become speculators with highly leveraged investments as a result of these loans.
People began purchasing second and third homes as a result of this strategy’s success. Many of them were bought with no-money-down mortgages. Furthermore, many of the mortgages were foreclosed on “For the first several months, the loans were “interest only” and required no repayments.
Complex financial products and leverage
The size of the Global Financial Crisis is largely due to the new financial instruments that contributed to the creation of the bubble. Bubbles usually burst when interest rates rise and there isn’t enough money to support higher prices. During the Global Financial Crisis, however, banks discovered a means to keep money pouring into the housing market, including the subprime sector.
MBSs (mortgage-backed securities) are mortgage pools that can be sold on secondary markets. MBSs have been replaced by collateralized debt obligations (CDOs), which are more complicated variants of MBSs. CDOs are divided into tranches based on their risk level. The safest tranches pay lower interest rates, whereas the riskier tranches pay higher interest rates. Rates AAA were the safest tranches, while rates BB- were the riskiest.
CDOs were repackaged throughout time to create new CDOs. The process of rating products became more obfuscated as the products became more complicated. CDOs containing exclusively high-risk mortgages were eventually rated AAA. This allowed pension funds all across the world to invest in the riskiest home loans, many of which they had no idea about.
New products were introduced as if dangerous derivatives with AAA ratings weren’t enough. Credit default swaps were introduced by banks to allow investors to insure their CDOs against default. These swaps have the same mortgage markets as CDOs. As a result, when the mortgage market started to slow, investors began betting on it via swaps. Credit default swaps were subsequently packaged into synthetic CDOs, which were new products. Rather than investing in mortgages, investors were betting on the mortgage market.
Fraud, conflicts of interest and regulatory failure
The Global Financial Crisis was facilitated by unethical behavior throughout the financial system. Fraud, conflicts of interest, and a lack of regulatory control were among the issues. To boost sales, mortgage originators frequently employed aggressive sales tactics and deception. Home buyers were urged to inflate their financial circumstances, and paperwork were frequently faked.
Rating organizations such as Standard & Poor’s and Moody’s were paid by the banks that constructed CDOs to rate the products. This created a significant conflict of interest because the rating agencies would only be compensated if the rating was favorable to the issuers. Banks were able to market exceedingly risky goods with investment grade ratings as a result of this. It also provided investors the misleading impression that the things they were purchasing were safe.
The issue was exacerbated by deregulation that occurred in the 1980s and 1990s. Bank trading operations expanded in importance and became a significant source of revenue. In addition, banks increased the amount of leverage they utilized to boost trading profits. Many banks and financial institutions realized they were too large to fail at the same moment. They understood that if things went bad, the government would bail them out.
When banks began wagering against their customers, another conflict of interest occurred. They produced items to meet client demand while also acknowledging that the products they were selling were extremely dangerous. They then began selling synthetic CDOs to clients, effectively wagering against them.
Regulators also contributed to the crisis by enabling risks to spread across the system. Although subprime lending was always understood to be dangerous, there was minimal regulation in place. The rating agencies were not regulated, allowing them to benefit from inaccurate ratings. And, with little action from regulators or central banks, banks were permitted to trade with growing amounts of leverage.
How did different asset classes perform during the Global Financial Crisis?
Because risk assets were hit so hard by the Great Recession, it’s important to understand how other asset classes fared. From the end of October 2007, when the S&P500 peaked, to the end of February 2009, when equities began to rebound, the following table shows how some of the key assets performed. The table also shows how long it took each asset class after February 2009 to recoup its October 2007 levels.
- All of the equity markets were highly connected. While emerging world stocks fared the worst, large-cap US stocks fared no better.
- The majority of alternative asset classes, such as hedge funds, gold, and commodities, outperformed traditional asset classes such as stocks and bonds.
- While some hedge funds did exceptionally well, those with negative reruns only lost about 5% of their value.
- Junk bonds, international stocks, and emerging market equities have yet to return to pre-crisis levels eleven years later. This is partly due to USD outperformance in the case of equities.
While each asset class’s performance differs from crisis to crisis, there is some continuity. The returns of 16 asset classes were examined in a Visual Capitalist article during the five major market crises, including the Great Recession. While the average losses were lower throughout all five periods, a similar pattern emerged.
Hedge funds, US treasuries, and gold were the best-performing assets. Stocks, junk bonds, and listed property investments were the lowest performers. Long-term returns must also be considered when looking at these returns. Long-term returns are higher for riskier asset groups. Long-term returns on alternative assets are lower, but they outperform during periods of market turbulence.
It’s also worth noting that individual hedge fund performance might vary significantly an index is a rough approximation of the returns of various sorts of funds. Some hedge funds that focused on subprime-related securities blew up during the GFC, while others returned more than 500 percent. Many of those who fared well in 2010 did not continue to do well after that. This emphasizes the point that hedge funds that specialize on a small number of markets may not be good long-term hedges.
How investors could have protected their portfolios during the GFC and other crises
The above returns demonstrate that, while risky assets such as stocks perform well over time, they can lose value quickly during a major event such as the Global Financial Crisis.
The only way to protect a portfolio from such disasters is to include alternative assets and bonds in the mix. The most reliable portfolio hedges are bonds, gold, and hedge funds. Because private equity, venture capital funds, and real estate are not marked to market every day, they can help to lessen volatility.
Conclusion: Learnings from the Global Financial Crisis
The Global Financial Crisis of 20072009 demonstrated the financial system’s complexity. The contagion swept across the world’s equity markets, causing even well-diversified equities portfolios to lose a significant amount of value. A portfolio with effective asset allocation can profit from long-term stock market growth while also surviving periodic downturn markets. Rebalancing asset classes also allows cash to be re-invested in risk assets when values are low and taken off the table when they are high.
Sometimes, like with black swan occurrences like the Coronavirus epidemic, there are warning indications before a catastrophe like the GFC, and sometimes there aren’t. The best way to avoid this is to diversify your portfolio at all times.
What should you buy before hyperinflation takes hold?
At the very least, you should have a month’s worth of food on hand. Depending on your budget, it could be more or less. (I cannot emphasize enough that it must be food that your family will consume.)
If you need some help getting started, this article will show you how to stock up on three months’ worth of food in a hurry.
Having said that, there are some items that everyone will want to keep on hand in the event of a shortage. Things like:
- During the early days of the Covid-19 epidemic, there were shortages of dry commodities such as pasta, grains, beans, and spices. We’re starting to experience some shortages again as a result of supply concerns and sustained high demand. Now is the time to stock your cupboard with basic necessities. Here are some unique ways to use pasta and rice in your dinners. When you see something you like, buy it.
- Canned goods, such as vegetables, fruits, and meats, are convenient to keep and can be prepared in a variety of ways. Individual components take more effort to prepare, but also extend meal alternatives, which is why knowing how to cook from scratch is so important. Processed foods are more expensive and have fewer options. However, if that’s all your family eats, go ahead and stock up! Be aware that processed foods are in low supply at the moment, so basic components may be cheaper and easier to come by.
- Seeds
- Growing your own food is a great way to guarantee you have enough to eat. Gardening takes planning, effort, and hard work, but there’s nothing more delicious or rewarding than eating something you’ve grown yourself. If you’re thinking of starting a garden this year, get your seeds now to avoid the spring rush. To get started, look for videos, books, or local classes to assist you learn about gardening. These suggestions from an expert gardener will also be beneficial.
Buy Extra of the Items You Use Everyday
You may also want to stock up on over-the-counter medicines, vitamin supplements, and immune boosters in case another Covid outbreak occurs. Shortages of pain relievers and flu drugs continue to occur at the onset of each covid wave, which is both predictable and inconvenient.
Which businesses prospered during the Great Depression?
Chrysler responded to the financial crisis by slashing costs, increasing economy, and improving passenger comfort in its vehicles. While sales of higher-priced vehicles fell, those of Chrysler’s lower-cost Plymouth brand soared. According to Automotive News, Chrysler’s market share increased from 9% in 1929 to 24% in 1933, surpassing Ford as America’s second largest automobile manufacturer.
During the Great Depression, the following Americans benefited from clever investments, lucky timing, and entrepreneurial vision.