When a company borrows money, the money it receives now will be repaid later with money it earns. Inflation, by definition, causes the value of a currency to depreciate over time. In other words, cash today is more valuable than cash afterwards. As a result of inflation, debtors can repay lenders with money that is worth less than it was when they borrowed it.
Is debt increased or decreased by inflation?
Question from a reader: Why does inflation make it easier for governments to repay their debts?
During the 1950s, 1960s, and 1970s, when inflation was quite high, the national debt as a percentage of GDP dropped dramatically. Deflation and massive debt characterized the 1920s and 1930s.
Inflation makes it easier for a government to pay its debt for a variety of reasons, especially when inflation is larger than planned. In conclusion:
- Nominal tax collections rise as inflation rises (if prices are higher, the government will collect more VAT, workers pay more income tax)
- Higher inflation lowers the actual worth of debt; bondholders with fixed interest rates will see their bonds’ real value diminish, making it easier for the government to repay them.
- Higher inflation allows the government to lock income tax levels, allowing more workers to pay higher tax rates thereby increasing tax revenue without raising rates.
Why inflation can benefit the government at the expense of bondholders
- Let’s pretend that an economy has 0% inflation and that people anticipate it to stay that way.
- Let’s say the government needs to borrow 2 billion and sells 1,000 30-year bonds to the private sector. The government may give a 2% annual interest rate to entice individuals to acquire bonds.
- The government will thereafter be required to repay the full amount of the bonds (1,000) as well as the annual interest payments (20 per year at 2%).
- Investors who purchase the bonds will profit. The bond yield (2%) is higher than the inflation rate. They get their bonds back, plus interest.
- Assume, however, that inflation of 10% occurred unexpectedly. Money loses its worth as a result of this. As prices rise as a result of inflation, 1,000 will buy fewer products and services.
- As salaries and prices rise, the government will receive more tax money as a result of inflation (for example, if prices rise 10%, the government’s VAT receipts will rise 10%).
- As a result, inflation aids the government in collecting more tax income.
- Bondholders, on the other hand, lose out. The government still owes only 1,000 in repayment. However, inflation has lowered the value of that 1,000 bond (it now has a real value of 900). Because the inflation rate (ten percent) is higher than the bond’s interest rate (two percent), their funds are losing actual value.
- Because of inflation, repaying bondholders needs a lesser percentage of the government’s overall tax collection, making it easier for the government to repay the original loan.
As a result of inflation, the government (borrower) is better off, whereas bondholders (savers) are worse off.
Evaluation (index-linked bonds)
Some bondholders will purchase index-linked bonds as a result of this risk. This means that if inflation rises, the maturity value and interest rate on the bond will rise in lockstep with inflation, protecting the bond’s real value. The government does not benefit from inflation in this instance since it pays greater interest payments and is unable to discount the debt through inflation.
Inflation and benefits
Inflation is expected to peak at 6.2 percent in 2022 in the United Kingdom, resulting in a significant increase in nominal tax receipts. The government, on the other hand, has expanded benefits and public sector salaries at a lower inflation rate. In April 2022, inflation-linked benefits and tax credits will increase by 3.1%, as determined by the Consumer Price Index (CPI) inflation rate in September 2021.
As a result, public employees and benefit recipients will suffer a genuine drop in income their benefits will increase by 3.1 percent, but inflation might reach 6.2 percent. The government’s financial condition will improve in this case by increasing benefits at a slower rate than inflation.
Only by making the purposeful decision to raise benefits and wages at a slower rate than inflation can debt be reduced.
Inflation and bracket creep
Another approach for the government to benefit from inflation is to maintain a constant income tax level. The basic rate of income tax (20%), for example, begins at 12,501. At 50,000, the tax rate is 40%, and at 150,000, the tax rate is 50%. As a result of inflation, nominal earnings will rise, and more workers will begin to pay higher rates of income tax. As a result, even though the tax rate appears to be unchanged, the government has effectively raised average tax rates.
Long Term Implications of inflation on bonds
People will be hesitant to buy bonds if they expect low inflation and subsequently lose the real worth of their savings due to high inflation. They know that inflation might lower the value of bondholders’ money.
If bondholders are concerned that the government will generate inflation, greater bond rates will be desired to compensate for the risk of losing money due to inflation. As a result, the likelihood of high inflation may make borrowing more onerous for the government.
Bondholders may not expect zero inflation; yet, bondholders are harmed by unexpected inflation.
Example Post War Britain
Inflation was fairly low throughout the 1930s. This is one of the reasons why individuals were willing to pay low interest rates for UK government bonds (in the 1950s, the national debt increased to over 230 percent of GDP). Inflationary effects lowered the debt burden in the postwar period, making it simpler for the government to satisfy its repayment obligations.
In the 1970s, unexpected inflation (due to an oil price shock) aided in the reduction of government debt burdens in a number of countries, including the United States.
Inflation helped to expedite the decline of UK national debt as a percentage of GDP in the postwar period, lowering the real burden of debt. However, debt declined as a result of a sustained period of economic development and increased tax collections.
Economic Growth and Government Debt
Another concern is that if the government reflates the economy (for example, by pursuing quantitative easing), it may increase both economic activity and inflation. A higher GDP is a crucial component in the government’s ability to raise more tax money to pay off its debt.
Bondholders may be concerned about an economy that is expected to experience deflation and negative growth. Although deflation might increase the real value of bonds, they may be concerned that the economy is stagnating too much and that the government would struggle to satisfy its debt obligations.
What effect does inflation have on national debt?
Spending cuts of any type are almost as unattractive to lawmakers. Taking away what the electorate considers a “right” or a “entitlement” is the equivalent of ending your political career.
Raising taxes is more palatable, especially in countries where the majority of people do not pay taxes or where the increases only affect “the rich,” as the populace perceives them. The danger is that if taxes are raised too high, the motivation to labor is reduced, and the economy as a whole collapses. As a result, gross tax collections fall, causing the country’s debt crisis to worsen as the government is forced to borrow more to avoid making any spending cuts.
Then there’s inflation. The most politically acceptable method of lowering the debt in a way that is mostly unnoticed by the people is to use sluggish, chronic inflation.
How Does Inflation Reduce Debt?
Because the currency loses value as a result of inflation, the people and institutions who own the debt are the losers. Assume you borrow money from the government by purchasing a $1000 US government bond with a ten-year maturity. You could get a fully loaded laptop or a round trip ticket to London for $1000 at the moment you buy it.
Let’s imagine the United States inflates its currency at a pace of 7% for the next ten years, which is roughly double the “average” inflation rate of 3.3 percent for the previous 80 years. The bond matures at the end of that period, and you receive your $1000 back. You go out to buy a laptop, which now costs $2000. The journey to London was also $2000. Many people in this situation will believe that laptop and airline ticket prices have increased.
In fact, the cost of these things hasn’t increased by a penny in real dollars (dollars adjusted for inflation). In this scenario, the value of the dollar has fallen by 50 percent over ten years. The United States government is the great winner here, as its multitrillion-dollar debt has been cut in half (in real terms) in just ten years. They were able to do so without raising taxes or slashing spending, which politicians find irresistible.
If the country experiences persistent deflation, similar to Japan, where consumer prices have fallen by up to 2% per year over the past 15 years, government revenues will fall while the real value of the country’s large debt will rise, further stalling future growth. It becomes a vicious cycle with few, if any, instruments available to politicians to break it.
As a result, the ideal treatment is progressive inflation. Citizens become like the proverbial frog that is slowly cooked in a pan of water with the temperature gradually increasing, rather than being frozen to death by deflation, when it is done well. Of course, neither outcome is good for the frog in the end.
Debtors or creditors benefit from inflation.
- Inflation redistributes wealth from creditors to debtors, so lenders lose out while borrowers gain.
- We can’t assert that inflation favors bondholders because Statement 2 doesn’t utilize the term “inflation-indexed bonds.”
What happens when prices rise?
Inflation raises your cost of living over time. Inflation can be harmful to the economy if it is high enough. Price increases could be a sign of a fast-growing economy. Demand for products and services is fueled by people buying more than they need to avoid tomorrow’s rising prices.
Is inflation beneficial to the government’s debt?
Because there is no inflation indexing, higher inflation diminishes the real value of the government’s existing debt while raising the tax burden on capital investment. By increasing the present annual inflation target regime from 2% to 3%, debt is reduced while GDP is reduced.
Inflation benefits who?
Inflation Benefits Whom? While inflation provides minimal benefit to consumers, it can provide a boost to investors who hold assets in inflation-affected countries. If energy costs rise, for example, investors who own stock in energy businesses may see their stock values climb as well.
Who benefits from inflation and who suffers from it?
Inflation is defined as a steady increase in the price level. Inflation means that money loses its purchasing power and can buy fewer products than before.
- Inflation will assist people with huge debts, making it simpler to repay their debts as prices rise.
Losers from inflation
Savers. Historically, savers have lost money due to inflation. When prices rise, money loses its worth, and savings lose their true value. People who had saved their entire lives, for example, could have the value of their savings wiped out during periods of hyperinflation since their savings became effectively useless at higher prices.
Inflation and Savings
This graph depicts a US Dollar’s purchasing power. The worth of a dollar decreases during periods of increased inflation, such as 1945-46 and the mid-1970s. Between 1940 and 1982, the value of one dollar plummeted by 85 percent, from 700 to 100.
- If a saver can earn an interest rate higher than the rate of inflation, they will be protected against inflation. If, for example, inflation is 5% and banks offer a 7% interest rate, those who save in a bank will nevertheless see a real increase in the value of their funds.
If we have both high inflation and low interest rates, savers are far more likely to lose money. In the aftermath of the 2008 credit crisis, for example, inflation soared to 5% (owing to cost-push reasons), while interest rates were slashed to 0.5 percent. As a result, savers lost money at this time.
Workers with fixed-wage contracts are another group that could be harmed by inflation. Assume that workers’ wages are frozen and that inflation is 5%. It means their salaries will buy 5% less at the end of the year than they did at the beginning.
CPI inflation was higher than nominal wage increases from 2008 to 2014, resulting in a real wage drop.
Despite the fact that inflation was modest (by UK historical norms), many workers saw their real pay decline.
- Workers in non-unionized jobs may be particularly harmed by inflation since they have less negotiating leverage to seek higher nominal salaries to keep up with growing inflation.
- Those who are close to poverty will be harmed the most during this era of negative real wages. Higher-income people will be able to absorb a drop in real wages. Even a small increase in pricing might make purchasing products and services more challenging. Food banks were used more frequently in the UK from 2009 to 2017.
- Inflation in the UK was over 20% in the 1970s, yet salaries climbed to keep up with growing inflation, thus workers continued to see real wage increases. In fact, in the 1970s, growing salaries were a source of inflation.
Inflationary pressures may prompt the government or central bank to raise interest rates. A higher borrowing rate will result as a result of this. As a result, homeowners with variable mortgage rates may notice considerable increases in their monthly payments.
The UK underwent an economic boom in the late 1980s, with high growth but close to 10% inflation; as a result of the overheating economy, the government hiked interest rates. This resulted in a sharp increase in mortgage rates, which was generally unanticipated. Many homeowners were unable to afford increasing mortgage payments and hence defaulted on their obligations.
Indirectly, rising inflation in the 1980s increased mortgage payments, causing many people to lose their homes.
- Higher inflation, on the other hand, does not always imply higher interest rates. There was cost-push inflation following the 2008 recession, but the Bank of England did not raise interest rates (they felt inflation would be temporary). As a result, mortgage holders witnessed lower variable rates and lower mortgage payments as a percentage of income.
Inflation that is both high and fluctuating generates anxiety for consumers, banks, and businesses. There is a reluctance to invest, which could result in poorer economic growth and fewer job opportunities. As a result, increased inflation is linked to a decline in economic prospects over time.
If UK inflation is higher than that of our competitors, UK goods would become less competitive, and exporters will see a drop in demand and find it difficult to sell their products.
Winners from inflation
Inflationary pressures might make it easier to repay outstanding debt. Businesses will be able to raise consumer prices and utilize the additional cash to pay off debts.
- However, if a bank borrowed money from a bank at a variable mortgage rate. If inflation rises and the bank raises interest rates, the cost of debt repayments will climb.
Inflation can make it easier for the government to pay off its debt in real terms (public debt as a percent of GDP)
This is especially true if inflation exceeds expectations. Because markets predicted low inflation in the 1960s, the government was able to sell government bonds at cheap interest rates. Inflation was higher than projected in the 1970s and higher than the yield on a government bond. As a result, bondholders experienced a decrease in the real value of their bonds, while the government saw a reduction in the real value of its debt.
In the 1970s, unexpected inflation (due to an oil price shock) aided in the reduction of government debt burdens in a number of countries, including the United States.
The nominal value of government debt increased between 1945 and 1991, although inflation and economic growth caused the national debt to shrink as a percentage of GDP.
Those with savings may notice a quick drop in the real worth of their savings during a period of hyperinflation. Those who own actual assets, on the other hand, are usually safe. Land, factories, and machines, for example, will keep their value.
During instances of hyperinflation, demand for assets such as gold and silver often increases. Because gold cannot be printed, it cannot be subjected to the same inflationary forces as paper money.
However, it is important to remember that purchasing gold during a period of inflation does not ensure an increase in real value. This is due to the fact that the price of gold is susceptible to speculative pressures. The price of gold, for example, peaked in 1980 and then plummeted.
Holding gold, on the other hand, is a method to secure genuine wealth in a way that money cannot.
Bank profit margins tend to expand during periods of negative real interest rates. Lending rates are greater than saving rates, with base rates near zero and very low savings rates.
Anecdotal evidence
Germany’s inflation rate reached astronomical levels between 1922 and 1924, making it a good illustration of high inflation.
Middle-class workers who had put a lifetime’s earnings into their pension fund discovered that it was useless in 1924. One middle-class clerk cashed his retirement fund and used money to buy a cup of coffee after working for 40 years.
Fear, uncertainty, and bewilderment arose as a result of the hyperinflation. People reacted by attempting to purchase anything physical such as buttons or cloth that might carry more worth than money.
However, not everyone was affected in the same way. Farmers fared handsomely as food prices continued to increase. Due to inflation, which reduced the real worth of debt, businesses that had borrowed huge sums realized that their debts had practically vanished. These companies could take over companies that had gone out of business due to inflationary costs.
Inflation this high can cause enormous resentment since it appears to be an unfair means to allocate wealth from savers to borrowers.
How does inflation benefit the government?
Unexpected inflation is beneficial to the government because it boosts tax collection when nominal income rises. a. People are pushed into higher tax bands when their nominal income rises.
Why is inflation beneficial to the economy?
Inflation is and has been a contentious topic in economics. Even the term “inflation” has diverse connotations depending on the situation. Many economists, businesspeople, and politicians believe that mild inflation is necessary to stimulate consumer spending, presuming that higher levels of expenditure are necessary for economic progress.
How Can Inflation Be Good For The Economy?
The Federal Reserve usually sets an annual rate of inflation for the United States, believing that a gradually rising price level makes businesses successful and stops customers from waiting for lower costs before buying. In fact, some people argue that the primary purpose of inflation is to avert deflation.
Others, on the other hand, feel that inflation is little, if not a net negative on the economy. Rising costs make saving more difficult, forcing people to pursue riskier investing techniques in order to grow or keep their wealth. Some argue that inflation enriches some businesses or individuals while hurting the majority.
The Federal Reserve aims for 2% annual inflation, thinking that gradual price rises help businesses stay profitable.
Understanding Inflation
The term “inflation” is frequently used to characterize the economic impact of rising oil or food prices. If the price of oil rises from $75 to $100 per barrel, for example, input prices for firms would rise, as will transportation expenses for everyone. As a result, many other prices may rise as well.
Most economists, however, believe that the actual meaning of inflation is slightly different. Inflation is a result of the supply and demand for money, which means that generating more dollars reduces the value of each dollar, causing the overall price level to rise.
Key Takeaways
- Inflation, according to economists, occurs when the supply of money exceeds the demand for it.
- When inflation helps to raise consumer demand and consumption, which drives economic growth, it is considered as a positive.
- Some people believe inflation is necessary to prevent deflation, while others say it is a drag on the economy.
- Some inflation, according to John Maynard Keynes, helps to avoid the Paradox of Thrift, or postponed consumption.
When Inflation Is Good
When the economy isn’t operating at full capacity, which means there’s unsold labor or resources, inflation can theoretically assist boost output. More money means higher spending, which corresponds to more aggregated demand. As a result of increased demand, more production is required to supply that need.
To avoid the Paradox of Thrift, British economist John Maynard Keynes argued that some inflation was required. According to this theory, if consumer prices are allowed to decline steadily as a result of the country’s increased productivity, consumers learn to postpone purchases in order to get a better deal. This paradox has the net effect of lowering aggregate demand, resulting in lower production, layoffs, and a faltering economy.
Inflation also helps borrowers by allowing them to repay their loans with less valuable money than they borrowed. This fosters borrowing and lending, which boosts expenditure across the board. The fact that the United States is the world’s greatest debtor, and inflation serves to ease the shock of its vast debt, is perhaps most crucial to the Federal Reserve.
Economists used to believe that inflation and unemployment had an inverse connection, and that rising unemployment could be combated by increasing inflation. The renowned Phillips curve defined this relationship. When the United States faced stagflation in the 1970s, the Phillips curve was severely discredited.