Living standards have risen all throughout the world as a result of economic expansion. Modern economies, on the other hand, have lost sight of the reality that the conventional metric of economic growth, gross domestic product (GDP), just measures the size of a country’s economy and does not reflect the welfare of that country. However, politicians and economists frequently use GDP, or GDP per capita in some situations, as an all-encompassing metric for measuring a country’s progress, combining economic success with societal well-being. As a result, measures that promote economic growth are perceived as positive for society.
We now understand that the reality is more complicated, and that focusing just on GDP and economic gain as a measure of development misses the negative consequences of economic expansion, such as climate change and income inequality. It’s past time to recognise GDP’s limitations and broaden our definition of development to include a society’s quality of life.
This is something that a number of countries are starting to do. In India, for example, where we both advise the government, an Ease of Living Index is being developed to gauge quality of life, economic ability, and sustainability.
Our policy interventions will become more aligned with the qualities of life that citizens actually value, and society will be better served, if our development measures go beyond an antagonistic concentration on increased productivity. But, before we try to improve the concept of GDP, it’s important to understand where it came from.
The origins of GDP
The contemporary idea of GDP, like many of the other omnipresent things that surround us, was born out of battle. While Simon Kuznets is frequently credited with inventing GDP (after attempting to quantify the US national income in 1932 in order to comprehend the full magnitude of the Great Depression), the present concept of GDP was defined by John Maynard Keynes during WWII.
Keynes, who was working in the UK Treasury at the time, released an essay in 1940, one year into the war with Germany, protesting about the insufficiency of economic statistics in calculating what the British economy might produce with the available resources. He stated that the lack of statistics made estimating Britain’s capacity for mobilization and combat problematic.
According to him, the sum of private consumption, investment, and government spending should be used to calculate national income. He rejected Kuznets’ version, in which the government’s income was represented but not its spending. Keynes observed that if the government’s wartime purchase was not factored into national income calculations, GDP would decline despite actual economic expansion. Even after the war, his approach of measuring GDP, which included government spending in a country’s income and was driven by wartime necessities, quickly gained favor around the world. It is still going on today.
How GDP falls short
However, a metric designed to judge a country’s manufacturing capability in times of conflict has clear limitations in times of peace. For starters, GDP is an aggregate measure of the value of goods and services generated in a certain country over a given time period. There is no consideration for the positive or negative consequences produced during the production and development process.
For example, GDP counts the number of cars we make but ignores the pollutants they emit; it adds the value of sugar-sweetened beverages we sell but ignores the health issues they cause; and it includes the cost of creating new cities but ignores the worth of the crucial forests they replace. “Itmeasures everything in short, except that which makes life worthwhile,” said Robert Kennedy in his famous election speech in 1968.
The destruction of the environment is a substantial externality that the GDP measure has failed to reflect. The manufacturing of more things increases an economy’s GDP, regardless of the environmental damage it causes. So, even though Delhi’s winters are becoming packed with smog and Bengaluru’s lakes are more prone to burns, a country like India is regarded to be on the growth path based on GDP. To get a truer reflection of development, modern economies need a better measure of welfare that takes these externalities into account. Expanding the scope of evaluation to include externalities would aid in establishing a policy focus on their mitigation.
GDP also fails to account for the distribution of income across society, which is becoming increasingly important in today’s world as inequality levels rise in both the developed and developing worlds. It is unable to distinguish between an unequal and an egalitarian society if their economic sizes are identical. Policymakers will need to account for these challenges when measuring progress as rising inequality leads to increased societal discontent and division.
Another feature of modern economies that makes GDP obsolete is its disproportionate emphasis on output. From Amazon grocery buying to Uber cab bookings, today’s cultures are increasingly driven by the burgeoning service economy. The concept of GDP is increasingly falling out of favor as the quality of experience overtakes unrelenting production. We live in a society where social media provides vast amounts of free knowledge and entertainment, the value of which cannot be quantified in simple terms. In order to provide a more true picture of the modern economy, our measure of economic growth and development must likewise adjust to these changes.
How we’re redefining development in India
In order to have a more holistic view of development and assure informed policymaking that isn’t solely focused on economic growth, we need additional metrics to supplement GDP. Bhutan’s attempt to assess Gross National Happiness, which takes into account elements including equitable socioeconomic development and excellent governance, and the UNDP’s Human Development Index (HDI), which includes health and knowledge in addition to economic prosperity, are two examples.
India is also started to focus on the ease of living of its population as a step in this approach. Following India’s recent push toward ease of doing business, ease of living is the next step in the country’s growth strategy. The Ease of Living Index was created by the Ministry of Housing and Urban Affairs to assess inhabitants’ quality of life in Indian cities, as well as their economic ability and sustainability. It’s also expected to become a measurement tool that can be used across districts. We feel that this more comprehensive metric will provide more accurate insights into the Indian economy’s current state of development.
The ultimate goal is to create a more just and equitable society that is prosperous and provides citizens with a meaningful quality of life. How we construct our policies will catch up with a shift in what we measure and perceive as a barometer of development. Economic development will just be another tool to drive an economy with well-being at its core in the path that society chooses. In such an economy, GDP percentage points, which are rarely linked to the lives of ordinary folks, will lose their prominence. Instead, the focus would shift to more desirable and genuine wellbeing determinants.
Why is GDP not a reliable indicator?
- It ignores the underground economy: Because GDP is based on official data, it ignores the size of the underground sector, which might be large in some countries.
- In a globally open economy, it is geographically limited: Gross National Product (GNP), which quantifies the production of a nation’s population and businesses regardless of their location, is seen as a better measure of output than GDP in some situations. For example, GDP does not account for earnings made in a country by international enterprises and remitted to foreign investors. This has the potential to exaggerate a country’s actual economic production. In 2012, Ireland’s GDP was $210.3 billion and its GNP was $164.6 billion, with the difference of $45.7 billion (or 21.7 percent of GDP) owing mostly to profit repatriation by foreign corporations based in Ireland.
- It prioritizes economic output above economic well-being: GDP growth alone is insufficient to assess a country’s development or citizens’ well-being. For example, a country’s GDP growth may be high, but this may come at a large cost to society in terms of environmental effect and income imbalance.
What is the problem with GDP?
This is just beginning to change, with new definitions enacted in 2013 adding 3% to the size of the American economy overnight. Official statistics, however, continue to undercount much of the digital economy, since investment in “intangibles” now outnumbers investment in physical capital equipment and structures. Incorporating a comprehensive assessment of the digital economy’s growing importance would have a significant impact on how we think about economic growth.
In fact, there are four major issues with GDP: how to assess innovation, the proliferation of free internet services, the change away from mass manufacturing toward customization and variety, and the rise of specialization and extended production chains, particularly across national borders. There is no simple answer for any of these issues, but being aware of them can help us analyze today’s economic figures.
Innovation
The main tale of enormous rises in wealth is told by a chart depicting GDP per capita through time: relatively slow year-on-year growth gives way to an exponential increase in living standards in the long run “History’s hockey stick.” Market capitalism’s restless dynamism is manifested in the formation and expansion of enterprises that produce innovative products and services, create jobs, and reward both workers and shareholders. ‘The’ “Economic growth is fueled by the “free market innovation machine.”
What impact does GDP have on the economy?
GDP is significant because it provides information on the size and performance of an economy. The pace of increase in real GDP is frequently used as a gauge of the economy’s overall health. An increase in real GDP is viewed as a sign that the economy is performing well in general.
What information does GDP provide about the economy?
The Gross Domestic Product (GDP) is not a measure of wealth “wealth” in any way. It is a monetary indicator. It’s a relic of the past “The value of products and services produced in a certain period in the past is measured by the “flow” metric. It says nothing about whether you’ll be able to produce the same quantity next year. You’ll need a balance sheet for that, which is a measure of wealth. Both balance sheets and income statements are used by businesses. Nations, however, do not.
What are the four flaws in using GDP as a measure of happiness?
Putting it all together in a nutshell The majority of the flaws stem from the fact that the notion isn’t intended to assess happiness in the first place. As a result, GDP fails to take into account non-market activities, wealth distribution, externalities, and the sorts of commodities and services generated within the economy.
What happens if GDP falls below zero?
The entire cash worth of all products and services produced over a given time period is referred to as GDP. In a nutshell, it’s all that people and corporations generate, including worker salaries.
The Bureau of Economic Analysis, which is part of the Department of Commerce, calculates and releases GDP figures every quarter. The BEA frequently revises projections, either up or down, when new data becomes available throughout the course of the quarter. (I’ll go into more detail about this later.)
GDP is often measured in comparison to the prior quarter or year. For example, if the economy grew by 3% in the second quarter, that indicates the economy grew by 3% in the first quarter.
The computation of GDP can be done in one of two ways: by adding up what everyone made in a year, or by adding up what everyone spent in a year. Both measures should result in a total that is close to the same.
The income method is calculated by summing total employee remuneration, gross profits for incorporated and non-incorporated businesses, and taxes, minus any government subsidies.
Total consumption, investment, government spending, and net exports are added together in the expenditure method, which is more commonly employed by the BEA.
This may sound a little complicated, but nominal GDP does not account for inflation, but real GDP does. However, this distinction is critical since it explains why some GDP numbers are changed.
Nominal GDP calculates the value of output in a particular quarter or year based on current prices. However, inflation can raise the general level of prices, resulting in an increase in nominal GDP even if the volume of goods and services produced remains unchanged. However, the increase in prices will not be reflected in the nominal GDP estimates. This is when real GDP enters the picture.
The BEA will measure the value of goods and services adjusted for inflation over a quarter or yearlong period. This is GDP in real terms. “Real GDP” is commonly used to measure year-over-year GDP growth since it provides a more accurate picture of the economy.
When the economy is doing well, unemployment is usually low, and wages rise as firms seek more workers to fulfill the increased demand.
If the rate of GDP growth accelerates too quickly, the Federal Reserve may raise interest rates to slow inflationthe rise in the price of goods and services. This could result in higher interest rates on vehicle and housing loans. The cost of borrowing for expansion and hiring would also be on the rise for businesses.
If GDP slows or falls below a certain level, it might raise fears of a recession, which can result in layoffs, unemployment, and a drop in business revenues and consumer expenditure.
The GDP data can also be used to determine which economic sectors are expanding and which are contracting. It can also assist workers in obtaining training in expanding industries.
Investors monitor GDP growth to see if the economy is fast changing and alter their asset allocation accordingly. In most cases, a bad economy equals reduced profits for businesses, which means lower stock prices for some.
The GDP can assist people decide whether to invest in a mutual fund or stock that focuses on health care, which is expanding, versus a fund or stock that focuses on technology, which is slowing down, according to the GDP.
Investors can also examine GDP growth rates to determine where the best foreign investment possibilities are. The majority of investors choose to invest in companies that are based in fast-growing countries.
What impact does GDP have on quality of life?
Families with higher incomes can spend more on the things they value. They can afford groceries and rent without straining their finances, obtain the dental care they require, send their children to college, and perhaps even enjoy a family vacation. In the meanwhile, it implies that governments have more capacity to deliver public services like as education, health care, and other forms of social support. As a result, higher GDP per capita is frequently linked to favorable outcomes in a variety of sectors, including improved health, more education, and even higher life satisfaction.
GDP per capita is also a popular way to gauge prosperity because it’s simple to compare countries and compensate for differences in purchasing power from one to the next. For example, Canada’s purchasing power-adjusted GDP per capita is around USD$48,130, which is 268 percent more than the global average. At the same time, Canada trails well behind many sophisticated economies. Singapore’s GDP per capita is around USD$101,532, while the US’s is around USD$62,795.
What effect does GDP have on poverty?
Growth was the major element behind the reduction of global poverty from 1990 to 2010. Developing countries’ GDP has grown at a rate of roughly 6% per year over the last decade, 1.5 percentage points faster than it did from 1960 to 1990. Despite the largest global economic crisis since the 1930s, this occurred. Following the recession, the three regions with the greatest number of impoverished people all experienced high GDP growth: East Asia at 8% per year, South Asia at 7%, and Africa at 5%. According to a preliminary estimate, every 1% rise in GDP per capita reduces poverty by 1.7 percent.
However, GDP is not always the best indicator of living standards and poverty alleviation. It is usually preferable to examine household consumption using surveys. Martin Ravallion, the World Bank’s head of research until recently, conducted 900 such surveys in 125 developing nations. According to his calculations, consumption in emerging countries has expanded at a rate of just under 2% per year since 1980. However, since 2000, there has been a significant increase. Annual growth before it was 0.9 percent; after that, it jumped to 4.3 percent.
Why is GDP not regarded as an accurate measure of overall output and societal economic well-being?
GDP is a rough indicator of a society’s standard of living because it does not account for leisure, environmental quality, levels of health and education, activities undertaken outside the market, changes in income disparity, improvements in diversity, increases in technology, or the cost of living.
What are GDP and GNP’s limitations?
While GDP confines its interpretation of the economy to the country’s physical borders, GNP broadens it to include the country’s nationals’ net foreign economic activities.