Changes in the global economy may have kept inflation in check in the United States, even as unemployment fell. For one thing, more trade and deeper global value chains may have made consumer price inflation less sensitive to local labor market conditions. The domestic Phillips Curve relationship for headline inflation lessens as countries’ exposure to imports increases, according to Kristin Forbes of the MIT Sloan School of Management, implying that domestic producers may be keeping prices low because they compete with international firms. “Over half of the flattening of the Phillips Curve can be attributed to import exposure. As a result, she claims, “globalization not only has direct and immediate consequences on inflation, but it also affects the Phillips Curve’s connection with slack.”
Furthermore, because worldwide markets are more integrated, fluctuations in global economic activity can have a larger direct impact on domestic inflation. Consumer price inflation (CPI), a broad measure of prices in a typical consumer’s basket, tracks global economic variables considerably more closely today than in the past. According to Forbes, this is due to the amount of global shocks that affect local inflation, as well as the sensitivity of domestic inflation to those shocks. She notes, for example, “Increased trade integration would imply a bigger proportion of price indices devoted to imports. As a result, fluctuations in global demand and supply would have a greater impact on prices. Take, for example, the reality that emerging markets now wield more clout in the global economy. As a result, changes in demand in emerging nations are increasingly driving price changes in commodities. Over the previous decade, it has generated bigger swings in commodity and oil prices, and that increased volatility in commodity and energy prices could flow through to prices in advanced economies.”
While these adjustments don’t explain why the Phillips Curve has flattened, they can help explain why the CPI in the United States has been so low in recent years. According to Forbes, a strong dollar, a drop in oil and commodity prices, and the reconstruction of global supply lines after the crisis brought down inflation during the labor market recovery following the Great Recession.
What factors contribute to low inflation?
Declining prices, on the other hand, can be caused by a number of other variables, including a fall in aggregate demand (the entire demand for goods and services) and higher productivity. Lower prices are usually the outcome of a drop in aggregate demand. Reduced government spending, stock market collapse, consumer desire to save more, and tighter monetary regulations are all factors contributing to this shift (higher interest rates).
What does it mean to have low inflation?
Low inflation typically indicates that demand for products and services is lower than it should be, slowing economic growth and lowering salaries. Low demand might even trigger a recession, resulting in higher unemployment, as we witnessed during the Great Recession a decade ago.
Deflation, or price declines, is extremely harmful. Consumers will put off buying while prices are falling. Why buy a new washing machine today if you could save money by waiting a few months?
Deflation also discourages lending because lower interest rates are associated with it. Lenders are unlikely to lend money at rates that provide them with a low return.
Is there truly no inflation?
While government figures show modest inflation, the fact is that the cost of living has increased during the pandemic, particularly for the poorer Americans. According to the most recent inflation statistics, prices have barely risen by 1% in the last year.
Why is Australia’s inflation so low?
Inflation is expected to slow between April and September of next year, according to the Fed. Which brings us back to wages in Australia. “I believe we’re prepared to look through it if that’s all it is and salaries aren’t adjusting,” Lowe added. “It’s unusual to have repeatedly higher inflation without persistently higher wage growth,” the RBA said, adding that it was willing to wait for outcomes.
Shifts in the cash rate, according to the Bank of International Settlements, affect just a small subset of products. It shows that globalisation has put downward pressure on the prices of marketable products, which is part of why inflation has been so low in many nations over the last decade or two.
The opposite is true during a pandemic. Goods prices have risen as a result of global supply disruptions. However, the fundamental remains the same, and raising rates due to supply-side constraints in Australia might potentially raise the cost of living for households with mortgages and other debts.
In the United States and the United Kingdom, salaries and inflation have been rapidly rising, but this has not been the case in Australia.
There are several important reasons behind this.
The first is the wage-setting procedure in Australia. “Wage-setting processes, such as multi-year business agreements and the yearly minimum wage case, “instill inertia” in aggregate wage decisions, according to Lowe. The second is “a “cost-cutting mindset” among employers, which makes them hesitant to raise salaries structurally, preferring instead to recruit and keep employees through short-term or one-time bonuses and incentives.
However, there are drawbacks to this outlook. Inflation expectations have long been anchored at the low end, which is thought to be part of the reason for wages stagnating for more than a decade. Expectations are largely regarded by economists to be a primary determinant of actual inflation. Theoretical and empirical research, according to Federal Reserve senior consultant and economist Jeremy Rudd, reveals that this notion is quite unstable.
“Any evidence that a revived concern about price inflation was starting to effect pay determination either in statistical form or in the form of anecdotes would be one thing to watch,” Rudd adds.
Consumer inflation expectations touched a six-year high this week, according to ANZ, which will likely lead to higher salaries. According to senior economist Catherine Birch, the bank expects wage growth to pick up significantly in the second half of next year, reaching 3%.
Who benefits from low inflation?
Although inflation has largely negative economic effects, there are two opposing factors to consider. First, the impact of inflation will vary significantly depending on whether it rises slowly at 0% to 2% per year, quickly at 10% to 20% per year, or rapidly to the point of hyperinflation at, say, 40% per month. Hyperinflation has the potential to destroy an economy and a society. An yearly inflation rate of 2%, 3%, or 4%, on the other hand, is a long way from a national disaster. If inflation rate variability is a concern, moderate and high inflation rates are more likely to have significant variability than low inflation rates.
Low inflation is also preferable to deflation, which occurs during severe economic downturns. Targeting a zero rate of inflation, on the other hand, risks undershooting, which leads to deflation. Deflation has the same issues as inflation, except it works in the opposite direction. As a result of unexpected deflation, debtors, for example, wind up paying more for loans.
Second, there is a case to be made that moderate inflation benefits the economy by making labor market salaries more flexible. The prior discussion of unemployment noted that wages have a tendency to be sticky in their downward swings, resulting in unemployment. A small amount of inflation might eat away at real earnings, allowing them to fall if necessary. In this way, whereas a moderate or high rate of inflation may operate as sand in the economy’s gears, a low rate of inflation may act as oil in the labor market’s gears. This is a contentious issue. All of the repercussions of inflation would have to be considered in a comprehensive examination. It does, however, provide still another reason to conclude that, in the grand scheme of things, extremely low inflation rates may not be particularly bad.
Why is low inflation preferable than none?
Low inflation is preferable because an economy with no growth in inflation (or zero inflation) risks deflation. Reduced pricing equals less production and lower pay, which pushes prices to fall even more, resulting in even lower wages, and so on.
Governments seek inflation for what reason?
Question from a reader: Why does inflation make it easier for governments to repay their debts?
During the 1950s, 1960s, and 1970s, when inflation was quite high, the national debt as a percentage of GDP dropped dramatically. Deflation and massive debt characterized the 1920s and 1930s.
Inflation makes it easier for a government to pay its debt for a variety of reasons, especially when inflation is larger than planned. In conclusion:
- Nominal tax collections rise as inflation rises (if prices are higher, the government will collect more VAT, workers pay more income tax)
- Higher inflation lowers the actual worth of debt; bondholders with fixed interest rates will see their bonds’ real value diminish, making it easier for the government to repay them.
- Higher inflation allows the government to lock income tax levels, allowing more workers to pay higher tax rates thereby increasing tax revenue without raising rates.
Why inflation can benefit the government at the expense of bondholders
- Let’s pretend that an economy has 0% inflation and that people anticipate it to stay that way.
- Let’s say the government needs to borrow 2 billion and sells 1,000 30-year bonds to the private sector. The government may give a 2% annual interest rate to entice individuals to acquire bonds.
- The government will thereafter be required to repay the full amount of the bonds (1,000) as well as the annual interest payments (20 per year at 2%).
- Investors who purchase the bonds will profit. The bond yield (2%) is higher than the inflation rate. They get their bonds back, plus interest.
- Assume, however, that inflation of 10% occurred unexpectedly. Money loses its worth as a result of this. As prices rise as a result of inflation, 1,000 will buy fewer products and services.
- As salaries and prices rise, the government will receive more tax money as a result of inflation (for example, if prices rise 10%, the government’s VAT receipts will rise 10%).
- As a result, inflation aids the government in collecting more tax income.
- Bondholders, on the other hand, lose out. The government still owes only 1,000 in repayment. However, inflation has lowered the value of that 1,000 bond (it now has a real value of 900). Because the inflation rate (ten percent) is higher than the bond’s interest rate (two percent), their funds are losing actual value.
- Because of inflation, repaying bondholders needs a lesser percentage of the government’s overall tax collection, making it easier for the government to repay the original loan.
As a result of inflation, the government (borrower) is better off, whereas bondholders (savers) are worse off.
Evaluation (index-linked bonds)
Some bondholders will purchase index-linked bonds as a result of this risk. This means that if inflation rises, the maturity value and interest rate on the bond will rise in lockstep with inflation, protecting the bond’s real value. The government does not benefit from inflation in this instance since it pays greater interest payments and is unable to discount the debt through inflation.
Inflation and benefits
Inflation is expected to peak at 6.2 percent in 2022 in the United Kingdom, resulting in a significant increase in nominal tax receipts. The government, on the other hand, has expanded benefits and public sector salaries at a lower inflation rate. In April 2022, inflation-linked benefits and tax credits will increase by 3.1%, as determined by the Consumer Price Index (CPI) inflation rate in September 2021.
As a result, public employees and benefit recipients will suffer a genuine drop in income their benefits will increase by 3.1 percent, but inflation might reach 6.2 percent. The government’s financial condition will improve in this case by increasing benefits at a slower rate than inflation.
Only by making the purposeful decision to raise benefits and wages at a slower rate than inflation can debt be reduced.
Inflation and bracket creep
Another approach for the government to benefit from inflation is to maintain a constant income tax level. The basic rate of income tax (20%), for example, begins at 12,501. At 50,000, the tax rate is 40%, and at 150,000, the tax rate is 50%. As a result of inflation, nominal earnings will rise, and more workers will begin to pay higher rates of income tax. As a result, even though the tax rate appears to be unchanged, the government has effectively raised average tax rates.
Long Term Implications of inflation on bonds
People will be hesitant to buy bonds if they expect low inflation and subsequently lose the real worth of their savings due to high inflation. They know that inflation might lower the value of bondholders’ money.
If bondholders are concerned that the government will generate inflation, greater bond rates will be desired to compensate for the risk of losing money due to inflation. As a result, the likelihood of high inflation may make borrowing more onerous for the government.
Bondholders may not expect zero inflation; yet, bondholders are harmed by unexpected inflation.
Example Post War Britain
Inflation was fairly low throughout the 1930s. This is one of the reasons why individuals were willing to pay low interest rates for UK government bonds (in the 1950s, the national debt increased to over 230 percent of GDP). Inflationary effects lowered the debt burden in the postwar period, making it simpler for the government to satisfy its repayment obligations.
In the 1970s, unexpected inflation (due to an oil price shock) aided in the reduction of government debt burdens in a number of countries, including the United States.
Inflation helped to expedite the decline of UK national debt as a percentage of GDP in the postwar period, lowering the real burden of debt. However, debt declined as a result of a sustained period of economic development and increased tax collections.
Economic Growth and Government Debt
Another concern is that if the government reflates the economy (for example, by pursuing quantitative easing), it may increase both economic activity and inflation. A higher GDP is a crucial component in the government’s ability to raise more tax money to pay off its debt.
Bondholders may be concerned about an economy that is expected to experience deflation and negative growth. Although deflation might increase the real value of bonds, they may be concerned that the economy is stagnating too much and that the government would struggle to satisfy its debt obligations.
Why don’t we desire zero inflation?
Inflation has a variety of economic costs – uncertainty, decreased investment, and redistribution of wealth from savers to borrowers but, despite these costs, is zero inflation desirable?
Inflation is frequently targeted at roughly 2% by governments. (The UK CPI objective is 2% +/-.) There are good reasons to aim for 2% inflation rather than 0% inflation. The idea is that achieving 0% inflation will need slower economic development and result in deflationary problems (falling prices)
Potential problems of deflation/low inflation
- Debt’s true value is increasing. With low inflation, people find it more difficult to repay their debts than they anticipated they must spend a bigger percentage of their income on debt repayments, leaving less money for other purposes.
- Real interest rates are rising. Whether we like it or not, falling inflation raises real interest rates. Rising real interest rates make borrowing and investing less appealing, encouraging people to save. If the economy is in a slump, a rise in real interest rates could make monetary policy less effective at promoting growth.
- Purchase at a later date. Falling prices may motivate customers to put off purchasing pricey luxury products for a year, believing that prices would be lower.
- Inflationary pressures are a sign of slowing economy. Inflation would normally be moderate during a normal period of economic expansion (2 percent ). If inflation has dropped to 0%, it indicates that there is strong price pressure to promote spending and that the recovery is weak.
- Prices and wages are more difficult to modify. When inflation reaches 2 percent, relative prices and salaries are easier to adapt because firms can freeze pay and prices – effectively a 2 percent drop in real terms. However, if inflation is zero, a company would have to decrease nominal pay by 2% – this is far more difficult psychologically because people oppose wage cuts more than they accept a nominal freeze. If businesses are unable to adjust wages, real wage unemployment may result.
Evaluation
There are several reasons for the absence of inflation. The drop in UK inflation in 2015 was attributed to temporary short-term factors such as lower oil and gasoline prices. These transient circumstances are unlikely to persist and have been reversed. The focus should be on underlying inflationary pressures core inflation, which includes volatile food and oil costs. Other inflation gauges, such as the RPI, were 1 percent (even though RPI is not the same as core inflation.) In that situation, inflation fell during a period of modest economic recovery. Although inflation has decreased, the economy has not entered a state of recession. In fact, the exact reverse is true.
Inflation was near to zero in several southern Eurozone economies from 2012 to 2015, although this was due to decreased demand, austerity, and attempts to re-establish competitiveness, which resulted in lower rates of economic growth and more unemployment.
It all depends on what kind of deflation you’re talking about. Real incomes could be boosted by falling prices. One of the most common concerns about deflation is that it reduces consumer spending. However, as the price of basic needs such as gasoline and food falls, consumers’ discretionary income/spending power rises, potentially leading to increased expenditure in the near term.
Wages that are realistic. Falling real earnings have been a trend of recent years, with inflation outpacing nominal wage growth. Because nominal wage growth is still low, the decrease in inflation will make people feel better about themselves and may promote spending. It is critical for economic growth to stop the decline in real wages.
Expectations for the future. Some economists believe that the decline in UK inflation is mostly due to temporary factors, while others are concerned that the ultra-low inflation may feed into persistently low inflation expectations, resulting in zero wage growth and sustained deflationary forces. This is the main source of anxiety about a 0% inflation rate.
Do we have a plan to combat deflation? There is a belief that we will be able to overcome any deflation or disinflation. However, Japan’s history demonstrates that once deflation has set in, it can be quite difficult to reverse. Reducing inflation above target is very simple; combating deflation, on the other hand, is more of a mystery.
Finances of the government In the short term, the decrease in inflation is beneficial to the government. Index-linked benefits will rise at a slower rate than predicted, reducing the UK government’s benefit bill. This might save the government a significant amount of money, reducing the deficit and freeing up funds for pre-election tax cuts.
Low inflation, on the other hand, may result in decreased government tax collections. For example, the VAT (percentage) on items will not rise as much as anticipated. Low wage growth will also reduce tax revenue.
Consumers are frequently pleased when there is little inflation. They will benefit from lower pricing and the feeling of having more money to spend. This ‘feel good’ component may stimulate increased confidence, which could lead to increased investment, spending, and growth. Low inflation could be enabling in disguise in the current context.
However, there is a real risk that if we get stuck in a time of ultra-low inflation/deflation, all of the difficulties associated with deflation would become more visible and begin to stifle regular economic growth.
Why is Australia’s inflation so high?
Australia’s annual inflation rate is now at 3%, according to the latest numbers for the September quarter (seasonally adjusted). So, what exactly is going on here? Prices are growing for a variety of causes, including computer chip shortages, bored consumers, and an ever-shifting worldwide epidemic, to name a few.
Why is two percent inflation the goal?
The government has established a target of 2% inflation to keep inflation low and stable. This makes it easier for everyone to plan for the future.
When inflation is too high or fluctuates a lot, it’s difficult for businesses to set the correct prices and for customers to budget.
However, if inflation is too low, or even negative, some consumers may be hesitant to spend because they believe prices will decline. Although decreased prices appear to be a good thing, if everyone cut back on their purchasing, businesses may fail and individuals may lose their employment.